Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Amazon’s little-known real-time facial recognition tech is being used by police

Documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union have revealed that police in both Orlando and Oregon’s Washington County are subscribed to Rekognition, Amazon’s facial recognition system. 

Facial recognition has become commonplace over the past decade, with numerous social media networks and photo apps now able to automatically identify people in photographs.

When you’re tagging people in your photography app of choice, it’s a helpful time-saving feature, but in the hands of law enforcement the technology has much more insidious potential.

In fact, one use case was outlined by Rekognition’s project director at a recent technology conference (as reported by The Verge), where they described how video feeds from surveillance cameras in Orlando could be fed into the software in order to identify and track persons of interest.

In other words, you could be under facially aware video surveillance just by walking down the street in Orlando.

When does convenience become tyranny?

Part of the problem with technologies like this is that it becomes incredibly difficult to identify when legitimate police work stops and unjust surveillance begins.

After all, when an officer walks down the street, they are mentally doing the same work as this facial recognition software by keeping an eye out for known offenders or anyone that the police are currently interested in speaking to.

But by allowing technology to use the video feeds of potentially hundreds of cameras to do this work on the police’s behalf, this opens the doors for much greater levels of intrusion. It’s also the first step down a potentially slippery slope — at first it might be used to locate dangerous criminals, but once this is normalised it could be used to keep track on less urgent matters.

Eventually it might even become normal to expect any members of the public to be tracked, “just in case” they commit a crime in the future.

Reports like this are hence incredibly important to hold police authorities to account. The ACLU has called on Amazon to stop providing the software to police forces, and we’d hope that this leads to a re-appraisal of the use of this technology by organisations that are expected to answer to the public at the end of the day.

Do you think it’s okay for a police force to use facial recognition technology on people without their consent? Let us know @TrustedReviews.

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

Trusted Reviews Logo

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the best of Trusted Reviews delivered right to your inbox.

This is a test error message with some extra words