Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Acer beTouch E101 Review

Verdict

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Key Specifications

  • Review Price: £164.99

A couple of weeks ago we looked at Acer’s neoTouch S200, its latest high-end handset that features a ferociously quick 1GHz processor and a high resolution screen. The E101, however, sits at the other end of the scale in the firm’s new line-up of smartphones. You can pick it up online for around £165, which makes it the cheapest Windows Phone currently on the market. Obviously, to build a handset for that price Acer has had to make some significant compromises, but the question is, has it made the right choices in which areas of the phone to scale back?
Acer beTouch E101 smartphone displaying home screen.


Certainly in terms of looks, the E101 doesn’t give off the air of a budget handset. Sure the body is made from plastic and doesn’t feel quite as sturdy as the iPhone or Nokia E52, but apart from the slightly flimsy battery cover it’s actually quite well built. It measures 113 x 56 x 12.8mm and weighs 118g, plus it’s pretty stylish, too, thanks to its clean angular lines and glossy black finish. And we like the way it’s not laden down with unnecessary buttons like some of the models in Acer’s previous range. On this one, you simply get a power button at the top, a volume rocker and lock switch on the left-hand side, and a button for the lowly 2-megapixel camera on the right-hand side. There’s even a stylus tucked away along the left side.
Side view of Acer beTouch E101 smartphone showing ports and buttons.


This is all pretty traditional stuff, but the controls on the front are a definite change from the norm. Instead of the usual four-way D-pad, the E101 has a touch scroll wheel. This acts much like the touch wheel on the iPod Classic, so gliding your finger around it moves up and down through the various menus. And as it’s also clickable, you can use it as a standard four-way D-pad if you want. Overall, we think the touch wheel works really well and is especially useful when you’re trying to navigate menus one handed. Along with the wheel there also the usual four Windows Phone buttons: Home, Back and two soft keys. Although these initially look like touch buttons, they’re actually traditional buttons, but as they’re very responsive this isn’t an issue.


Acer has kitted the handset out with a Qualcomm MSM 7225 processor that’s clocked at 528MHz. It’s similar to the processors that HTC has been using in its Windows and Android phones over the last year or so. While it’s obviously not in the same league as the 1GHz Snap Dragon CPU Acer uses on the high-end S200, it’s no slouch either and the handset felt reasonably sprightly to use. On the memory front, there’s 256MB or RAM and 512MB of ROM. Naturally, you can also add more storage space by sliding in a cheap microSD card into the slot hidden behind a small plastic flap on the right-hand edge of the phone.

So far so good, but unfortunately from here on in the E101 really starts to go off the boil. The most obvious failing is the 3.2in touchscreen, which really is shockingly poor. The resolution is quite low at 240 x 400 pixels, but we could accept this on a budget phone if it wasn’t for the fact that you can actually see the black lines between the horizontal and vertical pixels. It’s been a long time since we’ve seen grid structure on an LCD display, but sadly it’s very visible here. What’s more, onscreen colours are a tad subdued giving the display a rather drab look. And if this wasn’t enough the liquid crystal response rate also seem to be very low as you can see ghosting on the screen around icons and text when scrolling quickly.
Acer beTouch E101 smartphone back view with camera.


The phone’s connectivity is also shockingly poor. In an age when most manufacturers have long moved on from 2G handsets, the E101 is holding out against the tide of technology. This leaves you with just GPRS and EDGE for web browsing and picking up email. And what’s worse is that there’s no Wi-Fi support either, so you really are totally reliant on EDGE or GPRS for all data transfers. As a result, browsing is always a horribly slow experience and even though Acer has included a dedicated YouTube application it’s pretty much useless as there’s simply not enough bandwidth available on mobile connection to play video back without constant, long pauses for buffering.


Also, although the phone has onboard GPS, it was very slow to lock onto satellites even after we had downloaded the extra data that’s meant to speed up the process. This makes us think that Acer has probably used an older GPS chipset.


It’s a shame as there are other areas where the phone performs quite well. For example, its call quality was good, with crisp audio from the mic and callers sounding very clear on the loud earpiece. The speakerphone isn’t bad either, as long as you don’t push it all the way to full volume, as at this level it starts to sound a bit harsh and brittle.
Acer beTouch E101 smartphone on white background.


Battery life was pretty much in line with other, more expensive, Windows-based handsets. We got just under two days from the E101 – enough for a decent amount of calls and a fair bit of web browsing and GPS usage. The phone has a mini-USB port for charging and syncing rather than the micro-USB port that’s set to become standard over the next year or so. This port also doubles as the headphone jack for the supplied stereo headset, since there’s no standard 3.5mm headphone jack on the E101, unlike the higher end S200.


The supplied headset doesn’t sound too bad, although it is lacking a bit in bass and even when you try to compensate for this using the Windows Media Player equaliser the results still leave you wanting in the low frequency department.


”’Verdict”’


While the Acer beTouch E101 looks like quite an attractive handset on the surface, unfortunately when you dig beneath you find it’s just lacking too many features that we now take for granted on smartphones.

We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as our main phone for the review period

Reviewed using respected industry benchmarks and real world testing

Always has a SIM card installed

Tested with phone calls, games and popular apps

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Performance 4
  • Design 7
  • Value 6
  • Features 4

General

Operating System Windows Phone
Height (Millimeter) 113mm
Width (Millimeter) 56mm
Depth (Millimeter) 12.8mm
Weight (Gram) 118g
Available Colours Black

Display

Screen Size (inches) (Inch) 3.2in
Screen Resolution 240x400
Touchscreen Yes

Battery

Talk Time (Minute) 300m
Standby Time (Hour) 400hr

Storage

Internal Storage (Gigabyte) 0.512GB
Camera (Megapixel) 2 Megapixel
Front Facing Camera (Megapixel) No Megapixel
Camera Flash No

Connectivity

Bluetooth Yes
WiFi No
3G/4G No
3.5mm Headphone Jack No
Charging/Computer Connection microUSB

Processor and Internal Specs

CPU 528MHz ARM 11

Misc

GPS Yes

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

Trusted Reviews Logo

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the best of Trusted Reviews delivered right to your inbox.

This is a test error message with some extra words