Refine search for TVs
Sony Bravia KDL-32E5500 32in LCD TV Review
| Author | John Archer |
| Published | 23rd Jun 2009 |
| Manufacturer | Sony |
| Supplier | Pixmania |
| Price | £821.74 (Exc VAT) |
| as reviewed | £945.00 (Inc VAT) |
| Latest Price | Click here |
| Design | ![]() |
| Features | ![]() |
| Image Quality | ![]() |
| Sound Quality | ![]() |
| Value | ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() |
Elsewhere, the 32E5500 revels in the quality of Sony's latest MotionFlow engine. For the set does a really impressive job of reducing judder when showing fast camera pans of objects pelting across the screen. What's more, provided you don't set the MotionFlow circuitry any higher than its Standard level, you get the judder-reduction benefits without having to suffer lots of horrible processing side effects.
The only issue I had with the 32E5500's pictures, in fact, was the appearance a couple of times during my tests of a subtle but noticeable blue glow over objects appearing against very dark backgrounds. For instance, near the start of Casino Royale, there's a shot where an African freedom fighter opens three cases of money, before the camera tracks with him as he turns away from the money and crosses the room. And as his face looms close to the camera and hits roughly the centre of the screen, the blue glow over and around it is pretty defined - even with the contrast set reasonably low, noise reduction circuits deactivated, and automatic contrast and black level boosting circuits set to low. Odd! Just as well this phenomenon only seems to occur rarely.

The 32E5500's sound is decent enough for a 32in TV. It does a better job than many of keeping dialogue clear and believable during action scenes, for instance, and manages to avoid sounding horribly compressed, or harsh in the upper register. Perhaps inevitably there's not enough range at the bass end of the audio spectrum to always counterbalance trebles as satisfyingly as I'd like, but this is true of 95 per cent of the competition as well.
Verdict
Despite very, very occasionally suffering from a strange image glow issue, the 32E5500 is another fine performer from the latest Bravia stable. So far, so good. However, while we haven't actually tested its 32W5500 stable mate, we have no reason whatsoever based on its specification to suppose that it will perform differently to the 32E5500. And since it's more than £300 cheaper, I simply don't consider the 32E5500's fancy-pants design enough reason to justify its extra cost. Which is why I've been forced - for the first time ever, so far as I can recall - to give a TV that earns a 9 for picture an overall mark of just six.
Latest 4 of 5 Comments
Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.
Ripsnorter said on 23rd June 2009
rowdypop said on 23rd June 2009
this vs the Philips 9604,
any anti-philips or sony fanboy will never understand. but anyone whos neutral and have a chance to see these 2 tvs side by side will agre... more
rowdypop said on 23rd June 2009
The Philips 32pfl9604 is a top of the range LCD tv and its direct competitor should be the Z series from Sony, both with 200hz processing. not the 100hz W series.
i... more
Ahlan said on 23rd June 2009
You think your the only one that saw those tvs side by side? hey buddy let me tell you there are Electronic stores, hypermarkets, where you test those TV's side by side.
... more
See all 5 comments on this article.
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.







5 comments
Email
TrustedReviews Newsletters
Having seen this set up close and personally, it looks so tacky. I'm sure the build quality is up to Sony's usual standards but file it under niche and forget it!