Refine search for TVs

Sharp Aquos LC-32XL8E 32in LCD TV Review

Author John Archer
Published 4th Aug 2008
Manufacturer Sharp
Price £738.26 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £849.00 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price Click here
Design Score 7 for Design
Features Score 9 for Features
Image Quality Score 7 for Image Quality
Sound Quality Score 8 for Sound Quality
Value Score 7 for Value
Overall Score 7 for Overall
Sharp Aquos LC-32XL8E 32in LCD TV
Bookmark and Share discuss this article  3 comments    Email  Email trustedreviews newslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

Given that the 32X20E with which the 32XL8E has so much in common garnered a respectable 8 out of 10 when we reviewed it a few months back, I guess the question with the newer model has to be whether the addition of 100Hz takes it up that extra step into genuine best buy territory.

And the short answer is, no, it doesn't. Not because the 32XL8E isn't better than the 32X20E - in fact, it is. But rather because the march of time in the LCD world has brought with it rival models - especially the Philips 32PFL9603D - which highlight a few 32XL8E flaws.

The first of these concerns the Sharp's black level response. Compared with the best rivals, and even with some of Sharp's own bigger-screen TVs, the 32XL8E's black levels just don't look particularly inspiring. During a play-through of There Will Be Blood on Blu-ray, for instance, the extremely dark scenes at the start of the film where Daniel Plainview mines for silver are undoubtedly affected by a degree of LCD ‘grey clouding'. As well as making black colours look slightly unconvincing, this problem reduces the image's depth and costs the picture quite a bit of shadow detailing.


It doesn't help the black level situation, either, that the set's viewing angle isn't particularly forgiving, with noticeable extra greyness creeping in if you watch from more than 35-40 degrees.

The other main issue is that its rendition of HD sources just doesn't look as pin-sharp as it does on some rival Full HD screens. Sure, you can tell you are watching There Will Be Blood on Blu-ray rather than DVD, but you don't get that almost tangible sense of the harsh Southern Californian landscape I've noted with some HD screens. In fact, if I'm honest I feel as if some HD Ready (as opposed to Full HD) screens have made 1080-line sources look crisper than this Sharp does.

To be fair, the 32XL8E's pictures do at least look slightly sharper than those of the 32X20E, because of the 100Hz processing. This ensures that there's noticeably less motion blur around during motion-packed There Will Be Blood sequences such as the aftermath of the oil well blast that costs H.W his hearing.

Even better, the 32XL8E uses Sharp's ‘good' 100Hz engine - i.e. the one that looks natural with hardly any negative side effects - rather than the over-wrought monstrosity wheeled out on Sharp's debut 100Hz products a year or so ago.

But even with the 100Hz engine, there's ultimately no getting round the fact that Full HD 32in screens from Panasonic and especially Philips, to name but two, definitely look sharper.

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 3 of 3 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

comment Wackywavinginflateablearmflailingtubeman said on 5th August 2008

You were absolutely right to give this tv a 7 for design. Criticize Panasonic all you want for the silver lip, but at least they're not milking the same design for...well I do... more

comment Ironduke said on 5th August 2008

Thats true and sharps have had the same issue for a while now banding (I know i have a 46X020), but if you have seen their new 3cm depth LCDTV Trusted Reviews reviewed a month ago ... more

comment Wackywavinginflateablearmflailingtubeman said on 6th August 2008

True. But I'm still captivated by the likes of the LG Scarlet and Samsung's Touch of Colour TV's. Amazing design, what's wrong with the designers at Sharp? Come... more

See all 3 comments on this article.

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.