Sony Launches 32GB Memory Stick PRO Duo Comments

Author Gordon Kelly
Published 24th Aug 2009
Sony Launches 32GB Memory Stick PRO Duo

Comments for Sony Launches 32GB Memory Stick PRO Duo

« Read the Full News Story

comment Stewart said on 24th August 2009

The number of formats is the price of progress and the Memory Stick is not guilty alone as far as this is concerned - MMC, SD, SDHC, SDXC, Mini SD, Mini SDHC, Micro SD (Transflash), Micro SDHC, and even SDIO - phew! All acceptable in my book with the benefits each itteration has brought, as long as backward compatibility is maintained.

When the Memory Stick was first launched it was a desirable alternative to the SmartMedia and MMC cards (leaving aside the premium cost).

As always, where Sony fell down with the Memory Stick was with its premium pricing and its proprietary nature, which in the days when the cost of cards was significant, even swayed me away from Sony products, as I'd already invested in more universal memory cards. (I'm sure I'm not alone in this).

It's funny how proprietary and premium cost go hand in hand in Sony's book. Let's hope Sony have finally learnt their lesson.

comment Beaky69 said on 24th August 2009

You could argue that the Blu-ray specification was also proprietary, and that's worked out quite nicely for them...

comment Dan said on 24th August 2009

Blu-ray is different. There is only room for 1 format for a device that is a vehicle for playing 3rd party content. The battle of Blu-ray v HD-DVD was won based on which side the (large and very influential) 3rd party content providers sided with.

Using a proprietary memory card is fine. Until it becomes an integral part of your digital life, and you find you're wanting to plug it into your digital photo-frame / your TV / upload it on a laptop in the field etc. At that point you have to jump on the SD bandwagon, and it will influence your future choice of purchasing kit.

comment Nick Hustak said on 25th August 2009

I have avoided sony products due to the stupid memory stick that is has always cost more and has less space.

As far as blu-ray winning..well..depends on your point of view. It's pretty clear at this point Microsoft never intended HD-DVD to be the winner - if it won, cool, but the point was to delay Blu-ray adoption until the on demand service could get going.

In that respect, I'd say it's worked out pretty nicely for M$ - NetFlix for example. Microsoft has outsold the PS3 and made much more headway into making it a media center for the home. Bluray is still struggling - the average joe has a dvd player that he bought for $30 and buys DVDs for $8. He isn't going to pay $250 for a player and then $30 for movies. And replace his TV.

Sony should have LONG ago dumped the memory stick BS. They have a long history of trying every which way to lock in their customers. Blu-ray is the only time they have 'won' and it was a questionable win at best - adoption rate, if you throw out the PS3, is pretty low - it's still low WITH the PS3s. Personally I won't bother until the costs of the BDVDs comes down to something reasonable - and even then it will be few and far between. DVDs are simply 'good enough' for most people.

Add Your Comment

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.