Kingston Unveils First 256GB USB Drive Comments

Author Gordon Kelly
Published 20th Jul 2009
Kingston Unveils First 256GB USB Drive

Comments for Kingston Unveils First 256GB USB Drive

« Read the Full News Story

comment Dan said on 20th July 2009

Employees will start being searched at the door, in case they rip off the companies entire IP with something that could fit in their sock.....!

comment lifethroughalens said on 20th July 2009

a classic case of just because you can, doesn't mean you should!

Surely putting a 7.2K 250GB 2.5" HD in an ESATA / USB case would be a much faster and much cheaper and it's not exactly a bulky alternative. I can't for the life of me think who would need this.

comment Neil B said on 20th July 2009

@lifethroughalens, I don't NEED it but I do WANT it :-)

comment Thomas said on 20th July 2009

If like some of my memory sticks I lose this or it breaks I would be mad!

comment xbrumster said on 20th July 2009

waste of resources... even billionaires wont buy this thingy...

comment Pbryanw said on 20th July 2009

In ten years time we'll think, pah, 256GB, want a tiny amount of space, while we carry around our 100TB holographic-thumb-drives :)

comment Ardjuna said on 20th July 2009

@Pbryanw:
Indeed. We'll probably be reading about it using the holographic-thumb-drives' projectors while scrolling through pages using our mind, all while flying through the air in our cars. :)
- you think I'm kidding, don't you...

comment Ryan said on 20th July 2009

Hmm, I wonder how long that would take to fill up, going at full-tilt?

comment Xiphias said on 20th July 2009

Roughly 145 minutes, assuming 30MB/s write speed.

comment bg said on 20th July 2009

why cant any company produce a solid state 256gb mp3/pmp player using the same technology? I would buy that!

comment Chocoa said on 20th July 2009

@lifethroughalens " I can't for the life of me think who would need this."

Tho' I tend to agree. History does not.

Obvious stuff, but is seems to me the more capacity we get - the more we 'need'.
So far as portable storage goes, look as far as floppy disc -> CD(700MB) -> DVD (9GB) -> now BluRay (50GB) ->?

I would think the move away from mechanical(HDD/CD/DVD/BR) technology, to non mechanical storage can only be of advantage, in the long term. In addition, as we all know, emergent technology is initially expensive and of limited capacity....

comment ChaosDefinesOrder said on 20th July 2009

wow, so now Social Services, the NHS and the MoD can lose EVEN MORE data down the back seat of a taxi or bus!

I'm with Chocoa in the notion that the future of A/V is not with optical disks but more thumb drives containing the HD movie that you plug into the player. Be much more efficient and less prone to scratches! Current downside being that it would cost a lot more to produce than a BD-ROM currently does...

comment lifethroughalens said on 20th July 2009

@Chocoa

As I tried to incline in my post - the size of the storage doesn't impress me at all - the more the merrier, hell i'd appreciate a 1TB USB stick...but not at that speed - or lack of.

That's pathetic - you'd be hanging around for hours waiting to get that filled up by which time it'll be so hot it'll melt the case probably!. And it will never achieve the 30MB/s rate so as I said - seems a tad pointless.

Now if they were using eSATA or USB 3 standards then it would make great sense :)

comment ravmania said on 20th July 2009

it'll just be the same stuff stored in better quality. uncompressed .wav files, even higher hd films.

comment Steve said on 21st July 2009

@bg

There's too much money to be made selling people paltry amounts of storage space, that's why.

Add Your Comment

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.