Kingston Unveils First 256GB USB Drive Comments
| Author | Gordon Kelly |
| Published | 20th Jul 2009 |
Comments for Kingston Unveils First 256GB USB Drive
Dan said on 20th July 2009
lifethroughalens said on 20th July 2009
a classic case of just because you can, doesn't mean you should!
Surely putting a 7.2K 250GB 2.5" HD in an ESATA / USB case would be a much faster and much cheaper and it's not exactly a bulky alternative. I can't for the life of me think who would need this.
Neil B said on 20th July 2009
@lifethroughalens, I don't NEED it but I do WANT it :-)
Thomas said on 20th July 2009
If like some of my memory sticks I lose this or it breaks I would be mad!
xbrumster said on 20th July 2009
waste of resources... even billionaires wont buy this thingy...
Pbryanw said on 20th July 2009
In ten years time we'll think, pah, 256GB, want a tiny amount of space, while we carry around our 100TB holographic-thumb-drives :)
Ardjuna said on 20th July 2009
@Pbryanw:
Indeed. We'll probably be reading about it using the holographic-thumb-drives' projectors while scrolling through pages using our mind, all while flying through the air in our cars. :)
- you think I'm kidding, don't you...
Ryan said on 20th July 2009
Hmm, I wonder how long that would take to fill up, going at full-tilt?
Xiphias said on 20th July 2009
Roughly 145 minutes, assuming 30MB/s write speed.
bg said on 20th July 2009
why cant any company produce a solid state 256gb mp3/pmp player using the same technology? I would buy that!
Chocoa said on 20th July 2009
@lifethroughalens " I can't for the life of me think who would need this."
Tho' I tend to agree. History does not.
Obvious stuff, but is seems to me the more capacity we get - the more we 'need'.
So far as portable storage goes, look as far as floppy disc -> CD(700MB) -> DVD (9GB) -> now BluRay (50GB) ->?
I would think the move away from mechanical(HDD/CD/DVD/BR) technology, to non mechanical storage can only be of advantage, in the long term. In addition, as we all know, emergent technology is initially expensive and of limited capacity....
ChaosDefinesOrder said on 20th July 2009
wow, so now Social Services, the NHS and the MoD can lose EVEN MORE data down the back seat of a taxi or bus!
I'm with Chocoa in the notion that the future of A/V is not with optical disks but more thumb drives containing the HD movie that you plug into the player. Be much more efficient and less prone to scratches! Current downside being that it would cost a lot more to produce than a BD-ROM currently does...
lifethroughalens said on 20th July 2009
@Chocoa
As I tried to incline in my post - the size of the storage doesn't impress me at all - the more the merrier, hell i'd appreciate a 1TB USB stick...but not at that speed - or lack of.
That's pathetic - you'd be hanging around for hours waiting to get that filled up by which time it'll be so hot it'll melt the case probably!. And it will never achieve the 30MB/s rate so as I said - seems a tad pointless.
Now if they were using eSATA or USB 3 standards then it would make great sense :)
ravmania said on 20th July 2009
it'll just be the same stuff stored in better quality. uncompressed .wav files, even higher hd films.
Steve said on 21st July 2009
@bg
There's too much money to be made selling people paltry amounts of storage space, that's why.
Add Your Comment
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


Employees will start being searched at the door, in case they rip off the companies entire IP with something that could fit in their sock.....!