Sony Vegas Movie Studio HD Platinum 11 specs

By James Morris


Key Features

  • Import and edit footage from 3D camcorders
  • Adjustment of 3D effect
  • Support for 24p, 50p and 60p footage
  • Improved title creation and animation
  • Output of 3D footage to YouTube and 3D Blu-ray
  • Manufacturer: Sony
  • Review Price: £70.97
Operating System Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP
License Type Full Product
Media Format DVD
Program Type Video editing
System Requirements 2GHz processor, 2GB RAM, 400MB hard disk

Brian ONeill

July 7, 2011, 3:14 pm

Wow that UI looks horrendous. I tested a range of video editors a while ago, and they where all shockingly complex. I ended up using windows movie maker, basic but easy to understand.

I mean honestly would it kill these guys to invest a bit in usability? Adobe is the same.

Bob Dix Photographer

August 29, 2011, 4:34 am

Although I agree with Brian on the interface, After using Premiere Pro for 7 years , this is not so bad and really works efficiently, especially the GPU Acceleration on AVCHD and H.264 mov out of a Canon 5D Mark II, it's Stabilization is excellent and the unobtrusive rendering smooth, better than Premiere Elements. As this is an 1/8 price of Sony Vegas Pro 10 and based on the same operating system except not 64 bit, it still gives even Premiere Pro 5.5 a go for the money

Bob Dix Photographer

August 29, 2011, 1:16 pm

This is a really good editing suite for AVCHD & H.264 mov clips

Nicholas Staines

January 3, 2016, 10:37 pm

I have used Sony Vegas for a long time. The interface may be "intimidating" at first, but in no time you should feel yourself right at home. It great for professional editors and enthusiasts alike. Great performance. I am using Version 13 Vegas Pro. Not Movie Studio bit have used it before. I highly recommend this video editor along with a photo editor. If you hate subscriptions and want something like Adobe Pr, this is your only other option.

Rick L

March 15, 2016, 12:08 am

Does this work for Windows 10 x64? I'm having problems because it's looking for the old .net 3.5 sp1

comments powered by Disqus