Comments Sony Handycam HDR-CX105E - Camcorder - review

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Name withheld

KB

5:38 PM on 30 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore KB. Show Details Hide Details

Hmm... no external mic socket... That omission really pushes a cam into the toy category. I don't know how you can recommend a cam at that pricepoint without that - its a must have if you're ever going to seek decent sound, which is more important for watchability than decent image.

Score:

Name withheld

Geoff Richards

10:39 AM on 31 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Geoff Richards. Show Details Hide Details

It's horses for courses, KB. This cam is clearly aimed at the Point & Shoot brigade, and performs that function very well.

For more advanced users like you & me, we want features like accessory shoes and external mic sockets (nevermind the manual image controls missing from the CX105E). And that's fine too - we just have to scratch together a few hundred more and get a Canon HF100, or a few hundred more than that for a Panasonic HDC-TM300. Then treat ourselves to a new shotgun mic, a wide-angle lens attachment...

You can see why the Point & Shoot user will just hand over £500 and be done with it, while the spending never really ends of us enthusiasts :)

Score:

Name withheld

James Morris

1:04 PM on 31 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore James Morris. Show Details Hide Details

@K B Just to reinforce what Geoff said, if you're just looking to take a camcorder on holiday, you really won't want to bother with extra microphones - or extra anything really, even a tripod. I make video for a living and even I don't take any of these things for my holiday moviemaking. You can really ruin your family's pleasure by messing around with gadgets when you're all supposed to be having fun. The CX105E is one of the best options currently out there for this purpose - light and small, but shoots great video.

Score:

Name withheld

KB

7:27 PM on 31 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore KB. Show Details Hide Details

Point taken that if you know for sure you'll never want better sound than the onboard mic will give you. But if you're maybe buying this as your first cam... then decide to get more serious... well you've then got a cam that can produce maybe great HD video... but you'll have to go right out and buy another. All for the sake of not having a mic socket! If its a £100 cam then fair enough - but ditching the mic socket in a £450 cam... for what? Gets big minus points from me. I'd recommend someone buy something that will give them that option in the future, even if they don't think they'll want it right now. Plenty of alternatives at the same price point.

Score:

Name withheld

James Morris

7:36 PM on 31 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore James Morris. Show Details Hide Details

@K B I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Yes, there are plenty of alternatives with sound inputs, but actually not that many at this price point which can match the CX105E's video quality. Now that Panasonic's HDC-SD9 is becoming hard to find, there really aren't any I can think of for less than £500.

Score:

Name withheld

Mauro

6:52 PM on 4 June, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Mauro. Show Details Hide Details

Hi James, I am going to buy my first digital camcorder and I am very attracted by the Sanyo HD2000. After reading you review I put also the cx105e on the list, and I really can't decide between these two.

The Sanyo is 1080p, while the CX105 is 1080i.

The sony has an optical image stabilizer, while the sanyo digital one does not work very well, according to users comments.

The sanyo has a mic-in port and it uses standard SDHC cards, while sony uses the more expensive MS format.

I also cannot find a cx105 sample video at maximum resolution, so I cannot compare the image quality (colors, contrast, sharpness, noise under low-light etc.).

I'd also like to know something about the effective battery life.

What do you think?

Please help me! :-)

Score:

Name withheld

edzio

2:26 AM on 9 July, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore edzio. Show Details Hide Details

Could somebody tell me whether it'd be possible to put different lenses on this camera? Such as an 'opteka fisheye' lens? I'm a total newbie to camcorders, but would love to get some nice footage when I go away to Rome and want to be able to play around with a fisheye on some of the sights. Any help would be most appreciated, thank you :)

Score:

Name withheld

AndersLund

3:31 PM on 17 August, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore AndersLund. Show Details Hide Details

I just wanted to point out that Sony has been replacing the automatic lens cover with a manual on a lot of their new models, even higher priced ones. The reason? Reliyability. I have had 4 Sony camcorders with auto lens covers and ALL of them ended up having to go to repairs due to worn down parts. The little engine that flips it up and down can't withstand the amount of usage it receives. I personally welcome the manual, since it does not use up battery power, and it's more reliable. Not to mention it reduces the cost. It's just a small pointless thing to have really.

Score:

Name withheld

Kalos Geros

12:00 AM on 20 September, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Kalos Geros. Show Details Hide Details

just came accross this review...being a 1080i camcorder the CX105 doesn't really need all of the 2 mil pixels of 1080p...interlaced fields of 1080i video are 1920x540 which is actually just a tiny bit more than 1 mil pixels...so 1,17 mil pixel is enough to catter for both 720p and 1080i...no pixels are really lost or interpolated...

Score:

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.

Type Comment
(optional)

Please wait while we send the email.

You may send this to 5 e-mail addresses. Please separate each address with a space.

We're sorry, but the item you are sending has been removed from the site.

We're sorry. We were unable to send the email at this time.

Please specify a recipient.

You can only send messages to 5 addresses at a time.

The address "" is not valid.

Subject

Please specify a subject.

Comment
(optional) Send Cancel

Score
vote upvotes up
vote downvotes down

The Sony HDR-CX105E doesn't have the gobsmacking excitement of the HDR-TG3. It's not quite so small and although light, its form factor will mean it doesn't slip so easily into the pocket, unless you're wearing Barbour. But it does offer even better image quality, and will hardly be a pain to pop in your bag. The icing on the cake is that, unlike many of the camcorders we've seen this year, this one doesn't arrive at a noticeably higher price than previous models. In fact, for under £440, it's good value even by 2008 standards. It may not have many or any features for the enthusiast, but if all you're after is an easily portable camcorder that shoots high quality HD video, the CX105E fits the bill very nicely indeed.

Overall

9/10

Write your own review

Reviewed by James Morris

30 May 2009

Price as reviewed

£438.00

Comments on Sony Handycam HDR-CX105E

Overall

Price as reviewed

Comments

Name withheld

KB

Name withheld

Geoff Richards

Name withheld

James Morris

Name withheld

KB

Name withheld

James Morris

Name withheld

Mauro

Name withheld

edzio

Name withheld

AndersLund

Name withheld

Kalos Geros

Awards

Scores in detail

Price as reviewed

Manufacturer

Three of the best Mid to high end Camcorders

Panasonic HDC-SD90

Panasonic HDC-SD60

Panasonic HDC-SD80

Explore TrustedReviews

Site Sections

Round-ups

Tools and Social

More Information

Comments on Sony Handycam HDR-CX105E

Overall

Price as reviewed

Comments

Comments

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Name withheld

Awards

Scores in detail

Price as reviewed

Manufacturer

Camcorder round-ups

TrustedReviews newsletter

Three of the best Mid to high end Camcorders