1 of 20 pictures
Your articles doesn't actually say how long the battery life turned out to be in your tests/review.
One of the nice things about Apple laptops is that they all support WQHD (2560x1440) and WQXGA (2560x1600), so can drive 27" and 30" monitors at their native resolution.
Such support is remarkably hard to find on non-Apple laptops, despite many of them possessing a GPU capable of doing so. I had a colleague return an expensive Sony VAIO after discovering that it couldn't drive his 27" Dell monitor.
Does this Samsung support these resolutions via its microHDMI port or some adapter?
i find it astonishing that the tech press repeatedly publish articles describing Apple laptops as expensive vs 'Windows' laptops.
I'd love to have a nice Windows machine but from my perspective I can't see any machine that equals a MacBook at ANY PRICE once you consider: design (personal yes, but these days critical!), performance, and price.
Also consider that the MacBook range are discounted to the tune of 10-16% to many who work for large organisations including the NHS and Students.
Unless you REALLY need Windows - which most don't - Grab yourself a superb bargain, and get a MacBook.
I could not understand why all the hype about this new laptop?
What I could understand is that it is outperformed by a 7-8 months old Macbook Air - that is also currently cheaper and widely available. Just compared with the 13" Air review and 8 months ago it was marked 7 for features and 7 for value while this one got nines ?!?
I am not bashing the product, just was curious, is there some sort of anti-apple sentiment. I am a Windows user and would actually consider this Samsung if the graphics card was a bit better. If I put up with the graphics performance would I be better of getting an Air and putting Win on it, as far as i know Apple provide full driver support?
About time someone matched apples feature set blow for blow. Maybe my next laptop will be windows now which will finally allow me to ditch osx and its various irritations once and for all. Still that wont be for a few years yet.
I don't trust this review - I mean, a MacBook Air beater? Come on?
Isn't it just another clone of Apples brilliant design ideas, outstanding engineering and incomparable ingenuity?
Despite the Mac genome of a sleek and clean look, the alu unibody, backlit keyboard, touchpad etc. In my mind, it will always just be a wannabe MacBook Air, just another bamboo PC with Windows.
Honestly, if this is a trusted review, why would anyone ever write such an overly positive recommendation of this copy product, when you can get the real deal, being in every aspect a better and original product, and for an even lower price tag that runs both OSX and Windows - if anyone should ever want it or need it, on a Mac?
Is it just the claim of a better screen or, is it something else? I don't trust it? Do you?
Another gorgeous and highly tempting ultrabook ruled out for me by its lack of a built in 3G card... what is the point in having something so lovely and portable if you have to attach an ugly dongle to it to allow it to connect out of your house?
(I might post this on each ultrabook review until manufacturers get the idea - I can't get one until there's 3G connectivity!)
I don't get why people are so against this review, and so against the idea of somebody, shock horror, making a product better than Apple. Have you used it yourself? Have you spent a few hours actually using this laptop? No - but the reviewer has, and that is obviously how they have based their opinion.
Yes, this current generation of laptops have obviously been massively influenced by Apple. That doesn't mean they are not better, the whole notion "original is best" is ridiculous and completely takes away the whole notion of innovation - which is about taking existing ideas and making them better.
Stop being so close minded, this is obviously a stunning, beautiful and brilliant laptop that deserves to be given a chance. Dismissing it, without having used it, and seemingly because it doesn't have an Apple badge, is complete nonsense.
It would be interesting to see what all these comments read as, had it indeed been Apple.
>> various irritations
Have you any examples of these, all OS's have there quirks. Just curious what quirks you have with OSx.
Must admit, even being firmly in the camp of 'openly hostile' towards Apple's business model - even I would rather take a Mac Book over this, for the same price.
The deciding factor? Well, the seamless integration of Windows 7 (which I much prefer over OSX) with Apple hardware and the ability to use OSX as well. If you're looking at this budget and specifically in this category, Apple makes sense even if you're a MS person.
It still seems strange / wrong that only Apple PC's are capable of officially supporting their direct competitors OS. This should be a two way street.
It's got me a little confused too,. From re-reading this article the £100 extra you pay for the Samsung is down to Quality & Style. The extra performance of the air doesn't seem to be factored in here.
>> It still seems strange
Although it would be nice, I wound't say it's strange / wrong.
Did you actually read the review, or just look at the pictures? And with a monochrome monitor at that, because there's some colour to this Samsung and it's not simply another spin-off from the anaemic Ive conveyor belt.
So, perhaps the Samsung's better screen, or the significantly lighter weight, or the thinner chassis, or the better connectivity (USB3 is the superior choice, as Thunderbolt is so scarce that it's next to useless, and will remain so until the Windows community adopt it. Firewire anyone?), or the better battery - even the pre-production model, and TR believe that the production battery will have more stamina yet.
All of the above are essential for an ultraportable, and would warrant its high praise. Applefans obviously won't buy anything without the fruit badge, but many of the rest of us will seriously consider this.
I agree with Michael G. What do these people want? It's lighter, thinner, has a better screen, better battery (matching the MBA at the moment, but with perhaps more to come from the production battery) and more widely supported connectivity. If it was the next MBA with these same improvements they would all be screaming and booking their places in the queues outside the Apple Stores, but as it's only a lowly Samsung then it's a non-starter?
It's shown in the battery graph, but I will add it to the review. Thanks for your comment :)
All Intel Sandy Bridge laptops with HD3000 graphics (which is also what the MacBooks use) should support 2560 x 1600 through DisplayPort and over HDMI. We will test this to make sure and get back to you.
It's because generally, they are. The MacBook Air at least provided good value because the ultraportable competition was always either not quite as well-built, attractive or fully featured, but compared to the 900X3B the only area where the Air still wins (OS preferences aside, obviously) is possibly standby battery life. The Samsung is thinner, lighter, and has a far better screen... Performance should be equal, our sample seemed to be performing slightly below what it should considering its specs.
Have you read the review? It's thinner AND lighter than a MacBook Air, has a FAR better screen, more flexible connectivity, is at least as attractive (somewhat subjective, obviously) and offers comparable performance and battery life.
If you check the scores again, performance on this Samsung is also 7 (!), and when it came out the MacBook Air without a PLS/IPS screen cost £1350 at the time of review, compared to £1200 for this Series 9 - hence the lower value score.
I hope this clears up any confusion.
@Keithe6e: Aside from its higher resolution, the matt screen is PLS (Samsung's IPS equivalent) compared to the TN panel in the Air - this alone is worth the extra £100 it currently demands.
What @Overmars said.
Also, see my replies to @Michael 2 and @Everlast66.
So you don't trust our review because you can't accept that a "clone" can be better than the so-called original? (on which note, Sony had super-slim ultraportables long before the MacBook Air ever came out)
Also, the Air - while an excellent and TR Recommended product - is most certainly NOT "in every aspect a better [...] product".
We're with you on the hankering for inbuilt 3G @JonWill, at least as an optional extra...
Good point @ElectricSheep. However, personally I would rather have the better screen, even if it meant (officially) forgoing the delights of MacOS.
It is not so strange, but certainly very wrong! :)
I second @Keithe6e; curious to see which quirks in particular you find annoying compared to Windows 7? Cheers.
Nice one Samsung. No other manufacturer has ticked all the boxes with their ultrabook (or whatever you want to call them)offerings.
Now there is a real alternative to the Apple.
Stop going on about the price. It'll drop. Apple's won't.
@Ardjuna: Aside from...
I was using your comments, not mine.
>> even costing £100 more than the 13in MacBook Air. However, if you value quality and style, it's worth every penny.
I'm sure this is a fantastic machine and worth every penny, but it does still seem strange that a product made 8 months ago would still give this machine a run for it's money, and having 10% faster performance is nothing to sniff at.
Anyway, I still want one.
Could always go with wireless tethering, if that's you're only niggle.
Can't imagine that many people looking at a premium device like this wont have a suitably-equipped smart-phone to deliver 3G data in a pinch.
Updated: Microsoft and Apple are the winners in our latest update
Upgrading to Windows 10? These are the laptops and tablets to buy
There's a new entry in our round-up of the best student laptops
More Laptop Round-ups
Sign up for the
TrustedReviews email newsletter
Get TrustedReviews' award-winning reviews, opinions and advice delivered to your inbox for free!
Plus get great deals and exclusive offers from Time Inc. (UK) Ltd and its partners.
Trusted Reviews is part of the Time Inc. (UK) Ltd Technology Network