TrustedReviews

Home
TVs & Entertainment
Cameras
Laptops & Computing
Mobile & GPS
Video Reviews

Home » TVs & Entertainment » Blu-ray Player » Samsung BD-C6900 » Compare prices

Compare Prices for Samsung BD-C6900

More Photos

Even without its 3D capabilities, the BD-C6900 would be one of the best Blu-ray players on the market. It boasts a phenomenal range of features, the most impressive of which are comprehensive multimedia support and wireless networking, while its 2D picture quality, fast disc loading and slick operating system are also to be applauded. The only issue is the ghosting on 3D playback, but this is sure to be ironed out over time and the extra depth and visual dynamism still inspire enough wonder to make it worth the investment. Read full review

Overall

9/10

Write your own review

By Danny Phillips
Reviewed 11 June 2010
Updated 25 May 2012

Price as reviewed

£292.15

$348 Buy now

	$348	Buy now

compare more prices

Review
User Reviews
Comments
5 Photos
Compare Prices

Price comparison powered by

Prices, delivery and availability at 1 retailer
	$348	Go

Awards

Samsung BD-C6900 details

Performance: 8/10
Value: 9/10
Features: 9/10
Design: 9/10
Overall: 9/10

Price as reviewed

£292.15

Manufacturer

Samsung

Blu-ray Player round-ups

3D Blu-Ray Movies

We look at the popular 3D blu-ray movies available today, from Avatar to Thor and everything in between.

More Blu-ray Player Round-ups

TrustedReviews newsletter

Get TrustedReviews' award-winning reviews, opinions and advice delivered to your inbox for free!

Three of the best Mid range Blu-ray Players

Panasonic DMP-BBT01

Our rating:

9/10

A quirky, eye-catching Blu-ray deck with features galore
Panasonic DMP-BDT210

Our rating:

9/10

Panasonic brings the brilliance of the DMP-BDT310 to a lower price point with this excellent 3D Blu-ray deck.
Panasonic DMP-BDT310

Our rating:

9/10

Panasonic reaches for the Skype with its flagship 3D Blu-ray player, which brings a plethora of funky new features to the table.

User reviews & comments

Comments

To leave a comment log in or sign up

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

We encountered a problem recommending this user.

pluck_user_recommend_permission

You have recommended this user.

Type Comment
(optional)

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Send Cancel

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Brian

1:41 PM on 11 June, 2010

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Brian. Show Details Hide Details

one of the bes players on the market? It's £300 it can be no where near a more expensive player. If you said it was one of the best players below £500 or something i might lend the reveiw more credence.

And PS it's a seriously ugly player

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

meeto 0

4:56 PM on 11 June, 2010

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore meeto 0. Show Details Hide Details

@Brian, whilst aesthetics is a personal decision I have to side with the reviewer and say its a beautiful player. And why does a player have to cost £1000 for it to be considered one of the best players on the market. Above a certain price point is there any credible difference in picture quality when sampling Blu Rays from the main manufactures.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

alan1302

6:59 PM on 11 June, 2010

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore alan1302. Show Details Hide Details

@Brian - what a daft thing to say. Just because it's under £500 does not mean it's not the best

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Pbryanw

11:10 PM on 11 June, 2010

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Pbryanw. Show Details Hide Details

Not sure about the best in class statement, but I agree that it's one of the best looking pieces of kit I've ever seen (bearing in mind that beauty's in the eye of the beholder). I hope this kind of design filters down into Samsung's cheaper, non-3D, Blu-ray players.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Techno22

12:15 PM on 12 June, 2010

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Techno22. Show Details Hide Details

Hope they get this ghosting sorted as it sounds like a potentially

great machine.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

Andy0d2

3:34 PM on 12 June, 2010

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Andy0d2. Show Details Hide Details

The thing is you can get a £1000 Blu Ray player and because you have your tv settings slightly out means it is in fact a worse picture than with the £300 player.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

What Do You Think?

To leave a comment, you need to sign up.

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

Report Abuse

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.