Samsung BD-C6900 Deals

By Danny Phillips

Reviewed:

Brian

June 11, 2010, 5:41 pm

one of the bes players on the market? It's £300 it can be no where near a more expensive player. If you said it was one of the best players below £500 or something i might lend the reveiw more credence.





And PS it's a seriously ugly player

meeto 0

June 11, 2010, 8:56 pm

@Brian, whilst aesthetics is a personal decision I have to side with the reviewer and say its a beautiful player. And why does a player have to cost £1000 for it to be considered one of the best players on the market. Above a certain price point is there any credible difference in picture quality when sampling Blu Rays from the main manufactures.

alan1302

June 11, 2010, 10:59 pm

@Brian - what a daft thing to say. Just because it's under £500 does not mean it's not the best

Pbryanw

June 12, 2010, 3:10 am

Not sure about the best in class statement, but I agree that it's one of the best looking pieces of kit I've ever seen (bearing in mind that beauty's in the eye of the beholder). I hope this kind of design filters down into Samsung's cheaper, non-3D, Blu-ray players.

Techno22

June 12, 2010, 4:15 pm

Hope they get this ghosting sorted as it sounds like a potentially


great machine.

Andy0d2

June 12, 2010, 7:34 pm

The thing is you can get a £1000 Blu Ray player and because you have your tv settings slightly out means it is in fact a worse picture than with the £300 player.

comments powered by Disqus