Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Asus ZenBook UX305CA Review - Screen Quality, Keyboard and Trackpad Review

Sections

Asus ZenBook UX305CA – Screen Quality

One of the great strengths of the original ZenBook UX305 was its superb quality screen, and on first impression the UX305CA appears to benefit equally. The matte-finish IPS panel has offers good viewing angles and keeps reflections to a minimum. It’s also bright and displays punchy-looking colours, while still appearing to be able to create a reasonable black level.

However, on firing up my colorimeter it became evident that things weren’t quite as impressive as they initially seemed.

The screen proved to have quite a poor contrast ratio of just 476:1, which is among the lowest I’ve recorded in some time. I’d hope a decent IPS screen would deliver around 1,000:1, with 600:1 generally being the level where there’s obvious greyness to blacks or dullness to whites.

The culprit here is a black level measured at 0.8 nits, which is around double what most laptops can manage. So despite a relatively high 403-nit white level, the overall contrast is pulled down.

Asus ZenBook UX305CALaptop screens displaying varying brightness and color saturation levels.

Oddly, this isn’t really evident in general use. I fired up a few widescreen movies – so there are black bars on the top and bottom of the screen – and none displayed any sense of a washed-out greyness. Likewise, I opened up a black-and-white image, shown below, and compared it to one displayed by my ViewSonic VP2770 – a good-quality monitor with a much better measured black level – and the Asus wasn’t obviously worse, aside from a slightly green tinge.

The upshot is that, for most users, this screen will suffice – even when it comes to watching video and viewing photos. However, those who regularly edit images and video should steer clear.

Asus ZenBook UX305CALaptop screens displaying different color accuracy and brightness.
Compared to a quality monitor, the UX305CA’s screen looks okay

The other consideration here is the high resolution. At native resolution everything on-screen is super-small, so you’ll need to engage Windows’ scaling to enlarge text and icons.

Out of the box Windows automatically scaled by 250%, but this is unnecessarily large. I dropped this back down to 200%, which also makes much more sense since it’s a straight doubling of pixels so there’s less chance of the image looking slightly soft or blurry due to the scaling.

Asus ZenBook UX305CALaptop screen displaying different color calibration settings.
At native resolution everything is comically small, while Windows defaults to a massive 250%

Even set to this level, however, there were regularly occasions where certain apps didn’t work with the scaling, appearing really small.

It’s a problem that plagues the majority of Windows laptops and PCs offering high-resolution monitors, and is one key advantage of opting for Apple instead – the tight control of hardware and software means the company manages its high-resolution screens far better.

As a result of all the above, and assuming the 1080p version of this laptop uses the same screen as last year’s model, I’d plump for that version instead, assuming you can get it and it has the right keyboard etc. The Windows experience is more consistent and the overall quality is better.

Asus ZenBook UX305CA – Sound Quality

A surprising triumph of this laptop is the sound quality from its diminutive speakers. They produce surprisingly well balanced audio that’s reasonably loud too. Of course, bass is limited and audio won’t be sufficient for round-the-house listening, but it’s definitely more capable than some laptops, even devices that are considerably larger.

Asus ZenBook UX305CA – Keyboard

I’ve already mentioned the lack of backlighting on the keyboard, which is a bit of a downer, but otherwise the typing experience is excellent.

The layout of the keyboard is ideal, with keys that aren’t too squashed together and a convenient and logical arrangement of secondary functions. The key action is good, too, with reasonable travel and a nicely defined break point so you know when a key has registered.

Certainly, I experienced no problems touch-typing at a reasonable pace – even in the dark. However, I’d be interested to know how viable it would be to have a handful of important keys backlit. If just the cursor, F and J keys had backlighting, for instance, you’d benefit from having a visual reference to get your bearings for typing, but also save the money on having all the keys backlit.

Asus ZenBook UX305CALaptop with visible keyboard, trackpad, and screen displaying colorful content.

Asus ZenBook UX305CA – Trackpad

The UX305CA’s trackpad is okay, but not up there with the best. It’s of a good size and is integrated into one single-click piece, which is the style I prefer. It’s also reasonably responsive and tracks accurately.

However, I found my fingers wouldn’t glide very easily across is surface, sticking in certain areas. The click action is also a little stiff, to the point I’d be inclined to rely on the touch input more often than not. These are the sort of niggles you could live with, but going back to a good-quality touchpad is a reminder of what you’re missing out on.

Unlike other sites, we test every laptop we review thoroughly over an extended period of time. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as our main laptop for the review period

Tested for at least a week

Used consistent benchmarks for fair comparisons with other laptops

Reviewed using respected industry benchmarks and real world use

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

Trusted Reviews Logo

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the best of Trusted Reviews delivered right to your inbox.

This is a test error message with some extra words