- Amazing, stunning screen
- Powerful graphics
- Good battery life
- Excellent build quality
- Good value
- Poor connectivity
- Annoying artificial limitations
- Need iTunes to get content on it
- No expandable memory
- Thicker and heavier than most premium tablets
- Review Price: £399.00
- 9.7in, 2,048 x 1,536 Retina Display
- Apple A5X dual-core CPU
- 16-64GB storage
- 30-pin dock connector
- Bluetooth 4 and Optional 4G
iPad 3 according to users
The iPad 3 was Apple’s first Retina screen iPad. The quality of the screen is mesmerizing and still stands the test of time by looking great two years after launch. It’s also well-designed and robust, with users happy with the way it looks.
One of the primary problems with the iPad 3 is its size and weight. Android tablets have been getting better and better and now compete with the iPad. Apple has rectified this with the iPad Air, which will match the iPad mini 2 in design.
Performance of the iPad 3 is solid and, happily the advent of iOS 7 hasn’t caused the dreaded slowdown on the iPad 3, it still runs well.
If there’s a couple of areas the iPad 3 suffers it’s battery life and value for money. Battery life is reasonable solid but not outstanding. You’ll get a full day’s use out of it but if you’re using 3g that will reduce significantly. It also takes a fair bit of time to recharge meaning you won’t be able to blast it for half an hour before you leave the house.
A couple of other things to consider if you’re looking to buy and iPad 3 second hand is that it uses the old style 21 pin Apple connector as opposed to the new Lightning one. That means that if you have an iPhone 5S, 5C or 5 you’ll have to use different chargers.
iPad 3 – Introduction
Apple’s iPad line is the best-selling tablet range of all time and when it came out the iPad 2 set some pretty high expectations for the market, so to say that most people were excited about the potential of the iPad 3 – officially called the “new iPad”, which is ridiculously confusing – is a bit of an understatement.
Looking for the best iPad 3 alternatives? Have a read of our Best Tablets
But does it live up to the hype? In most ways, the answer is a resounding yes. The iPad 3 sports the highest-resolution screen ever seen in a tablet; internals with more graphics power than most handheld consoles barring the PS Vita; seriously improved cameras; and it’s all still stuck into a relatively light and slim aluminium shell. Yet despite this the iPad 3 maintains the same 10-hour battery life and will cost you no more than its predecessor did.
Black Friday Deals
Best Kindle Deals for Christmas 2017: Save £15 on the excellent Kindle Paperwhite
Best Kodi Box 2017: The only Android TV devices you should buy this Christmas
The Nvidia Shield TV just got a major pre-Christmas price slash – save over £35 today
Amazon Echo Dot drops back to Black Friday price for Christmas 2017 – save £15 today
Best Nintendo Switch Deals: Cheap Nintendo Switch consoles and games
However, if you weren’t a fan before, there might not be enough to this latest model to change your mind. There are even one or two minor downsides compared to the iPad 2, and it’s fair to say that in many ways the Android competition has caught up.
New iPad Wi-Fi: 16GB – £399, 32GB – £479, 64GB – £559
New iPad Wi-Fi 4G: 16GB – £499, 32GB – £579, 64GB – £659
iPad 3 – Design and Weight
From a design standpoint, Apple hasn’t fixed what wasn’t broken. If you didn’t have them side by side, the iPad 3 could easily be mistaken for its predecessor’s twin. It’s virtually identical in every regard, save that at 9.4mm it’s nearly a whole millimetre thicker and also weighs a little more at 652g for the Wi-Fi version or 662 with 4G.
That’s quite considerable, and it’s a bit of a shame that the iPad 3 has gotten heavier where tablets with slightly larger screens and better connectivity, like the 568g Asus EeePad Transformer Prime or 558g Toshiba AT200 (review coming soon), have managed to keep their weight below that of the iPad 2.
Sign up for the newsletter
Get news, competitions and special offers direct to your inbox
Of course there’s good reason for this extra weight. The new Retina Display requires beefier specs to push pixels onto it, which in turn meant that Apple had to up the battery capacity to maintain the new iPad’s nine-hour plus figure. However, the difference in the hand is telling, and while the AT200 feels like you could hold it in a single hand without strain for extended periods, the iPad 3 is definitely a tablet that’s more comfortably held with both.
So dimensions are very similar, and the iPad 3’s look hasn’t changed much either. It’s still an attractive slab of immaculately finished aluminium with a glass front, and it’s still available with black or white bezels. As is usually the case with Apple products, build is superb, with no signs of flex, creak, or poorly fitted seams. The smooth aluminium back still feels great, though it is perhaps a little less grippy than we might like. Of course, the same complaint can be leveled at many competing tablets.
iPad 3 – Controls and Buttons
Volume, screen lock and power controls on
the Apple new iPad are still in the same locations as with its previous
tablet, and they all feel just as secure or clicky as before. The
screen orientation lock switch can also be set to mute volume. Our only
annoyance is that their edges are a little sharp, which can be
unpleasant when you’re running your finger along an edge trying to
iconic central Home button at the front also makes a return, identical
to the previous iteration. Especially in landscape mode, this button
falls nicely under your thumb, and though you have to stretch a little
when holding the iPad vertically, we still prefer it to the virtual home
button on many recent Android slates – especially since it doesn’t eat
up any of that precious screen.
iPad 3 – Connectivity
is where the iPad 3 falls down compared to nearly every other tablet
out there. In terms of standard connections, a 3.5mm headphone jack is
all you get. There’s still no video output like HDMI for hooking the
iPad up directly to a TV or monitor; no SD card slot for getting your
photos easily onto the tablet, swapping memory cards with your phone or,
perhaps most crucially, expanding the tablet’s memory when you run out
of space; and no USB for hooking up a memory stick or wired peripherals.
Instead, you get the same old proprietary 30-pin docking port at the
bottom of the tablet (when held in portrait mode) we all love to hate.
what, you might say. After all, there are plenty of adapters available
that let you do all of the above. Direct from Apple, the £35 Digital AV
Adapter gives you a regular-size HDMI connector along with a 30-pin
throughput, and the perhaps even more useful £25 Camera Connection Kit
contains two adapters: one for full-size USB 2.0 and another providing a
full-size SD card reader. However, aside from the added expense there’s
a rather serious failing: many USB devices you plug in using the former
adapter – including memory sticks – simply will not work.
since Apple’s iOS 4.2.1 update, there have been (artificial software)
restrictions on the amount of power the USB adapter is able to provide,
and unfortunately this hasn’t changed for the new iPad. So not only can
you not plug your memory stick with photos or videos directly into your
Apple tablet, but even if you buy a £25 adapter – compared to the £5
cable an Android slate using microUSB might require – you still won’t be
able to. You’ll just get a message saying “the connected usb device
requires too much power”. So the adapter is only useful for attaching
powered USB hubs, cameras (usually in PictBridge mode), and
least the SD card reader works somewhat as expected, though again
there’s no native file manager for reading from different folders on a
card. The iPad 3 – or rather, iOS 5 – just sticks with the default DCIM
one and shows you the photos from there (as long as they’re in an
accepted format, that is), if you don’t have one it may not even
recognise the card. So again it’s difficult or impossible to get content
onto the new iPad using physical media.
Though iCloud at least
partially compensates for this limitation on the media end, we don’t
find it very acceptable on a modern media consumption and productivity
device, and it’s definitely a good reason to prefer an Android tablet.