Polaroid Develops Ink-free Portable Printer
| Author | Gordon Kelly |
| Published | 10th Jul 2008 |
Comments for Polaroid Develops Ink-free Portable Printer
Azro said on 10th July 2008
Beaky69 said on 10th July 2008
An SD card slot would be handy :o)
Jon Cook said on 10th July 2008
It looks like a great idea and hopefully will develop into something bigger and better. 60 secs for a very small print is a little excessive and the 3 inch by 2 inch size is a little, well, gimmicky in my view. However, if it can get up to 6 by 4 or even 7 by 5 in future it will be a product with some commercial possibility.
ilovethemonkeyhead said on 10th July 2008
hmm, i don't know - you need specific paper, so it's pretty much passing the cost from one medium to another. plus i guess the paper can only be used with that printer (like inks, then).
lifeisagame said on 11th July 2008
hm... i didn't know anyone was still printing photos. i know about 30 people that use digital cameras an non of them is printing them...
Add Your Comment
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


Genius! I love it already. My family used to have a Polaroid camera and the film was very expensive - you have to currently pay some £22 (600film) for 20 exposures so 30 for £7 seems a pretty good deal in comparison (despite the smaller size). In more ways than one, it's like they've turned themselves back around as a traditional photographic company embracing the new portable digital age. All they need now is a larger print size (and better battery) for more serious photographers, together with Pictbridge or whatnot capability so SLR users can print the odd shot off. Seems a shame to limit it to pairing with a mobile phone.