Home / Mobile / GPS & Sat Nav / Polar RCX5 / Size and functionality

Polar - RCX5 Size and functionality

By Cliff Jones



Our Score:


The RCX5 is the lowest profile fitness watch of the five sport watches we have tested this year (See our Fitness Technology Round-up for full details), sitting at just 1.1cm high on the wrist. While fully integrated with GPS, the flag ship Garmin Forerunner 610 towers above the RCX5 and yet has a smaller screen.

Measuring 24.5 x 4.6 x 1.1 cm and weighing 46g, the RCX5 is also 33g lighter than the Foreunner 610 and 22g lighter than a Casio G-Shock Classic. We weren't keen on the design, though. While we can forgive the manufacturer's name being on the watch face, but manufacturers take note: unless you have made a car, don't emblazon the model number all over your product. The watch has the word "Polar" written in no fewer than six places, and the words "Performance Science" written on the face and down the side of the strap, which is frankly rediculous.

The 1.2 x 1in screen is easy to read and the buttons are well placed and big enough to be operated wearing gloves while staying out of the way during exercise. We especially liked the big red timing/record button which is on the face of the watch, ready to punch when you stop or start a workout.

The display can show up to six different screens that the user can scroll between during a workout. Each of these is customisable with everything from a live readout of calories burned (based on the user’s heart rate and weight), to average cadence if you’re working on building speed, pace, miles covered or more.

There is also a heart-tap function, which can display a data set of your choosing when you bring the watch up to the heart rate monitor. Like the best innovations, this is something we didn't realise we wanted until it was invented for us. Having the ability to check the time of day during a run simply by lifting the watch to chest height made us wonder how we managed without it.


September 27, 2011, 11:48 pm

Not in the same class price-wise but I was very disappointed with the build quality of a Polar S410 that I purchased for my wife. The material covering the buttons was repeatedly prone to cracking and then the whole lot would disintegrate. My wife is by no means a power user of all of the watches functions, often simply wearing the watch to tell start and end times of a run, so its not like the buttons got a lot of abuse. Even when replaced (at a charge) by Polar the same buttons failed again (the large red one on the front and two of the side ones). The strap also proved to be a weak point, with the shorter length that holds the buckle failing in two different places. I don't know what Polar's reputation for reliability is but I was put off getting a Polar myself and stuck with a simple Timex that proved very capable and durable. I'm now considering other options to give me more information, such as Garmin solutions, so this review caught my eye. I'm not sure, though, if just sticking to the Timex and combining it with an app like Endomondo on a lightweight smartphone would be just as useful.


September 28, 2011, 1:47 pm

The build quality on the RCX5 is very good. The strap is more flexible and rubberised which suggested to me it won't dry out and crack the way that my older 1st gen Polar watch has.

Garmin announced a revamp of its Forerunner 210 yesterday. I have been very impressed with the Endomondo app. Free apps are rapidly changing the game for Sat-Nav and GPS watches are no exception. Just a shame that data plans are less generous now.

heart rate watch Monitors

April 10, 2012, 3:05 pm

I was born to be cyclist.I have used Polar RCX5.It is really good stuff with indeed a difference.I like polar watches and I have my collection of polar.thanks for sharing.heart rate watch Monitors

comments powered by Disqus