Home / Mobile / Fitness / Pebble Time

Pebble Time review

By

Updated:

1 of 30

pebblereview 13
  • Pebble Time Video Review
  • pebblereview 13
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • Pebble Time
  • pebblereview 1
  • pebblereview 5
  • pebblereview 7
  • pebblereview 9
  • pebblereview 11
  • pebblereview 15
  • pebblereview 17
  • pebblereview 19
  • pebblereview 21
  • pebblereview 23
  • pebblereview 25
  • pebblereview 27
  • pebblereview 29

Summary

Our Score:

6

Pros

  • Timeline works well
  • Impressive battery life
  • Always-on clock
  • Waterproof to 30m

Cons

  • Feels cheap
  • Dodgy buttons
  • Limited iOS features
  • Childish animations

Key Features

  • 1.25-inch e-paper display
  • 5-7 day battery life
  • Android and iOS compatible
  • Cortex M4 CPU
  • 42.5g
  • Bluetooth 4.0
  • Pebble OS 3.0
  • Compass
  • Manufacturer: Pebble
  • Review Price: £179.00

Update:

Pebble has just confirmed that it has been acquired by Fitbit and will no longer be making its own hardware. Fitbit has acquired Pebble predominantly for its software team. It's the end of Pebble as we know it, with the company stating that it could "no longer operate as an independent entity".

What does the acquisition mean for existing Pebble smartwatches? Pebble has stated: "functionality or service quality may be reduced down the road". What this means exactly we can't be sure but this is worth keeping in mind if you do decide to pick up a Pebble Time at this point.

Our original Pebble Time review continues below.

What is the Pebble Time?

The Pebble Time is the sequel to what was, it’s fair to say, the world’s first successful smartwatch. Pebble’s original wearable broke records on Kickstarter and became a poster child for crowdfunding, but it was far from perfect. It felt cheap, looked like a toy and had a fairly average monochrome display. Surprisingly, Pebble went back to Kickstarter to fund and launch the Time. Again, it broke records.

The Pebble Time looks to improve on its predecessor in almost every area. More care has been taken with the design and materials, the black and white display has been replaced with a colour one, and there’s a completely new operating system powering everything. But the Pebble Time just leaves us wishing for something more. The original Pebble had the luxury of novelty and newness, the Time doesn't and that shows. It may be better in most ways, but so are the alternatives.

pebblereview 7

Pebble Time – Design

Smartwatches and good design haven’t really gone hand in hand so far, with the current crop all too often looking like tiny wrist computers, rather than pieces of jewellery. The first Pebble was built completely out of plastic, giving it the feeling of a cheap toy.

Design is more of a key feature this time around, but we feel it once again misses the mark.

Instead of relying completely on plastic, Pebble has taken a page out of the Steel’s book and kitted the Time out with a smattering of metal. There’s now a metal bezel surrounding the display, but the base remains completely constructed from cheap-feeling plastic. We do like the slight curve to the body, though, as it helps the watch comfortably sit on your wrist.

TrustedReviews Awards 2015: Winners announced

The hardware buttons – three down for the right for navigation and one on the left – are also made from plastic. We really wish Pebble had opted for metal buttons, as these feel mushy and are packed so tightly together that they’re a pain to press.

SEE ALSO: Pebble Time vs Apple Watch

pebblereview 29

Just like with the original, there’s a whiff of geek-chic surrounding this watch. We don’t see it fitting in well if you’re heading out to an important meeting in a suit, and we even felt it stood out a bit too much when we were just wearing it casually.

It is fairly light, though, tipping the scales at just 42.5g, and the body is 9.5mm thick, which is 1mm thinner than the Apple Watch.

Another problem we’ve found with the majority of smartwatches is the straps. Both the Moto 360 and LG G Watch R shipped with flimsy, cheap-feeling bands that detracted from the well-designed cases, and the Pebble Time also falls into this trap.

The included silicone strap is chunky, slimy and seems to get hot and sweaty very quickly. Thankfully it’s a fairly standard size (22mm), so you can switch it out and clip on a third-party strap – a quick search of Amazon brings up a load of compatible straps and metal bracelets.

pebblereview 27

Pebble and a slew of other manufacturers will also start producing ‘Smart Straps’ that promise to add extra functionality to the device. We’ve not seen any of these confirmed yet, but we’re expecting extra fitness features, heart-rate monitors and the like.

You’ve also got to take into consideration that this watch will cost £179/$199. That, in our minds, lands right outside of the impulse-buy territory that the original Pebble very much hit. At £179, the Pebble Time is more expensive than a Moto 360, Sony Smartwatch 3 and a smattering of other Android Wear watches, and it’s arguably less fully featured and elegant than its rivals.

Pebble Time – Screen

If there was one area where the Pebble fell even more behind its rivals, it was with its monochrome display. This was used to conserve battery, and while it was fine, it felt quite limiting as the device grew older.

For the Time, Pebble has finally decided to embrace colour. Though if you’re expecting an LCD or OLED panel packing tons of pixels, you’re going to be disappointed. Instead, Pebble has opted to stick with e-paper. This gives you a screen that lacks the sharpness and colour variety of the competition, but that consumes very little power and is always on. That last point is key, the Pebble Time’s display is constantly visible whether or not you’re looking directly at it. This makes it look more like a real watch than simply a computer strapped to your wrist.

Using e-paper should, in theory, also make the Pebble Time much better than other LCD smartwatches in direct sunlight. And yes, on the whole it is. It’s bright enough to see in daylight, though it suffers from poor viewing angles. Tilt it a little sideways when you’re outside and you’ll struggle to see anything.

Covering the display is 2.5D glass, giving it a slight curvature on the sides, which gives a good amount of protection from accidental scratches. In our time with the watch we haven’t seen any dings or scrapes appear, so hopefully it’ll end up being a tough, durable wearable.

SEE ALSO: Apple Watch review

pebblereview 23

Pebble Time – Features

Many of the features boasted by the Time have come straight from the previous Pebble, but they’ve been tweaked slightly to take advantage of that new colour display.

Music controls are a great smartwatch feature, and they’re done well on the Pebble Time. You can play, pause and switch tracks, and unlike on the previous version you don’t have to pre-select which music app you’re using. The only music app we’ve had trouble getting the watch to recognise is Audible, though that app has a tendency to be a buggy mess anyway.

pebblereview 25

Then, of course, you’ve got notifications. Smartwatches and notifications have gone hand in hand since the original Pebble and for many it’s the main reason for picking up one of these wearables. Aside from the issues we mentioned earlier, they work pretty much as expected here.

On Android you can dial down and filter the notifications that appear on your watch, whereas on iOS it’ll just beam everything through. That means your wrist probably won’t stop buzzing from the moment you wake up until the second you fall back to sleep again.

One area that Pebble seems to have shied away from is fitness. There are a couple of gym and step-tracking apps, but none of these are pre-loaded and they come from the likes of Jawbone and Misfit rather than Pebble itself. There is an accelerometer built in, which provides the step-tracking, but nothing more than that. The idea here is that developers will build the aforementioned ‘Smart Straps’ to integrate fitness features like a heart rate monitor.

Pebble hasn’t really added any revolutionary features this time around, which is somewhat of a shame. We’re not talking about bolting on a camera or anything like that, but there just isn’t really anything to make us stand and up take note.

It is waterproof though, up to 30 metres. That means you can go for a swim and have a shower without worrying about causing any damage. This is a pretty big deal, especially as the Apple Watch can't handle anything stronger then a downpour and the majority of Android Wear watches are IP58 rated, so you can only keep them on in the shower. Sony's Smartwatch 3 does have an IP68 rating, but even that can only manage being submerged in 1.5m of water. The Pebble Time is the clear winner here.

aeonturnip

March 3, 2015, 1:10 pm

That's a heck of a bezel on the thing - looks like a toy in comparison to the latest Android Wear watches. Still, 5-7 day battery life is a winner. Good to see colour e-ink in a mass-market device (I know it's been tried before without success) - time for it to be used in mainstream e-readers for magazines / manuals that would benefit fro colour pictures / graphs?

jrmckins

May 4, 2015, 1:31 am

"For a battery top-up, you still need a charger that magnetically connects to the left of the watch. No change there."

Really?

LeeTronix

May 4, 2015, 4:54 pm

I prefer the design of the Steel and the bezel on this just looks wrong and out of place. I have to disagree this watch has gone backwards in looks but that is where it ends as for the rest of the watch it sounds great.

Prem Desai

July 8, 2015, 12:12 pm

if "There’s not actually a lot to dislike about the Pebble Time", why does it score only 6/10.

This is probably the most usable smart watch out there.

To the author: rather than concentrating on metal buttons and the like, try living with it for a couple of weeks.

Dead Words

July 8, 2015, 2:18 pm

6/10...riiiight.

Senyol

July 8, 2015, 9:01 pm

For me as a user - it is fantastic - works well as a watch and keeps me informed of notices and diary - all I need in a watch - I think it is great

Bugblatter

July 8, 2015, 9:16 pm

The reviewer was expecting something life-changing and was disappointed so he marked it down. He forgot that it's a watch.

William Prince

July 8, 2015, 11:22 pm

Suprisingly bad review from TR? As somebody who bought a Meta watch on their recommendation - I know what a beta product is. But it did make me realise that watches with notifications are something I need. This is a great product, I've worn it
for 3 weeks now and really miss it when I've got my Garmin GPS on instead.
It feels great on the wrist, even when working at a desk (partly the
reason I've not gone for the metal one again) - it is quick, responsive - the
screen is good enough (great in some lights) with the dictate to answer
messages genuinely useful and surprisingly accurate. The OS is snappy and
the animations grow on you because you instantly know the operation has been
actioned. This is a complete product and when you look at the blank boxes
strapped to Apple owner’s wrists – you know that sometimes it is the smaller
companies that get it right. An easy 8 out of 10 - which is what you
flipping gave the Meta watch in 2013, which couldn't even tell the time unless constantly
tethered: difficult when losing connection was the only notification it did get right.

Dead Words

July 9, 2015, 6:13 pm

Exactly. He was disappointed with the Apple Watch and he wanted the Pebble Time to come in and save the day. As far as I can see this is the best smart watch that has come out pretty much ever.

Adrian Brown

July 10, 2015, 9:59 am

Totally agree. I have the original kickstarter Pebble. It is extremely useful. Yes perhaps it lacks style but it has so much in terms of substance. Battery life measured in days rather than hours and a constant display are attributes that I'm not sure I could live without. The polycarbonate strap got a bit of slap in the review but mine has survived about 160 hours a week for the last two years. The watch itself has also undergone that endurance test without any problems or visible damage. The Time looks like it will continue this legacy. A very poor, biased review.

jimt29

August 13, 2015, 10:26 am

Here's my recent experience ordering from Pebble on line:

I ordered the Pebble Steel on 7/20/15 with a purchase price of $169.00. A minute or so later I received a confirming email showing a purchase price of $219.00, a difference of $50.00.

I replied back immediately explaining the problem. Didn't hear back. I also contacted Pebble using their website contact page, again explaining the problem.

The watch was shipped but refused. My credit card was charged $219.00.

On 7/27/15 I did receive a reply but no mention about the $50.00 error. Also the tracking information indicated the watch was received back on 7/27/15 and again I have received no email confirming receipt as of todays date (8/13/15) or a credit back to my credit card.

Walder Matthews

May 12, 2016, 4:24 am

Now grab pebble watches online only below

comments powered by Disqus