There are several conclusions that can be drawn from these figures, but the key one is: Our panel preferred prints produced with ink from a third-party provider over those produced with manufacturer’s own products.

With each manufacturer, third-party ink and paper combinations won more top scores than prints produced with own-brand inks and papers. In the case of Canon, none of the photo paper prints produced with its own ink got a top score. With the Canon, Epson and HP printers, Cartridge World received more top scores than using manufacturers’ ink and with Lexmark, the same is true of the ink sold by InkTecShop.

The highest score for a paper and ink is shared by three different combinations, on three different printers, all of which scored 8.29/10 overall: the Canon printer using InkTecShop ink on Kodak paper, the HP machine printing on HP paper with Cartridge World ink and the Lexmark device using InkTecShop ink on Staples paper.

If you look at the inks across the full range of papers, taking an average of the scores from the different print samples, then Cartridge World wins three out of the four categories and InkTecShop takes the fourth. In every case, though, these scores are only marginally higher than the scores for the manufacturers’ inks.

If you look at the results table from the other direction, the best paper overall is Staples, which had 16 of the print high scores produced on it. It's interesting to note that the original manufacturers’ papers did much better in this survey than their inks did, with the Canon, Epson and Lexmark papers coming either first or second in their printer groups.

The overall average scores for the four printer brands, using manufacturer’s ink on plain paper, are HP – 7.62, Canon – 7.10, Epson – 6.67 Lexmark – 5.76. For those prints using both manufacturer’s ink and photo paper, they are HP – 7.29, Epson – 7.05, Canon 6.79 and Lexmark 6.14. So, when you consider prints produced by a printer using its manufacturer’s ink and paper, HP produces what are considered the best prints overall, on both plain and glossy photo paper.

Where do we go from here?

We’ve established that third-party inks can produce prints which are equally well liked to those produced using manufacturers’ own inks, but this is only half of the story. All the main printer manufacturers claim that third-party inks fade far more quickly than their own.

To test this out we are going to take the samples we obtained from this research and stick parts of them in an outside window, parts on a board on an inside wall and parts in an album in a drawer. We'll look at them again after three and six month intervals and see which samples have faded. Third-party inks and papers are not in the clear yet, but they've come through the first part of our examination with flying colours; literally.

The concluding parts of our investigation can be found here:

The Inkjet Investigation Part 2

The Inkjet Investigation Part 3


January 6, 2012, 9:32 am

Thanks. Very information and great charts. Maybe the models are a bit old, but definitely give me some thoughts for how to choose a cost-effective printer.


January 23, 2012, 6:09 pm

i would never again choice stationary to buy my printer cartriges again as they said that my delivery would be delivered in 2 days 3 days later no cartriges have arrived so not a good place to buy cartriges so this review has a big 0 from me for so if anyone is reading this then be prepared for really bad customer service and prepare for a long wait for printing cartriges


July 20, 2012, 10:24 pm

Purchased replacement compatible inks for my canon mg6250 from ink jungle via amazon,very cheap deal and was pleasantly suprised at the results on my photo,s.quite acceptible.

Paul Hurford

November 30, 2013, 4:14 pm

Fascinating stuff. I'm pleased to see that the best option for my Canon printer is to use Cartridge World. So that's what I'll do! The only bad point about this article is that it needs proof-reading, but the content and the experiments seem very thorough.

Anne Wigan

March 26, 2014, 10:16 am

Totally disappointed and frustrated with compatible cartridges I bought from printerinks for my epson printer. Got messages 'cartridge not recognised', cartridge showed empty after only a few days. It took a lot of fiddling about to get the cartridges accepted then the quality of print was appalling, cleaned heads, no different, impossible to use. Eventually went back to Epson's own. Printerinks did not want to know; they would not allow me to return the 5 cartridges I still have as over 6mths has elapsed (I have been in hospital and unwell). I probably just had a bad experience but I would advise against printerinks.


February 17, 2015, 8:09 pm

I don't know…So, all the prints were made with the same settings? I think you have to apply less ink to cheap, copy paper than you can apply to glossy photo paper. And, shouldn't we load in color profiles for the papers? Do the 3rd-party inks have color profiles? If so, how would we load them?


January 3, 2017, 12:33 pm

Would have been a more helpful review if a data sheet was produced - I would like to know whether the printer head was integral to the cartridge as well as a grid of results. All this writing is worth less without it.....

comments powered by Disqus