Home / Opinions / The truth behind the 4K display on Sony's Xperia Z5 Premium

The truth behind the 4K display on Sony's Xperia Z5 Premium

Andrew Williams


Xperia Z5 Premium 5

4K on trial: Is it better than 1080p and quad-HD on a phone?

The Sony Xperia Z5 Premium is the first 4K phone we’ve used. In pure resolution terms it’s like four iPhone 6S Plus displays stacked up against each other.

For the pedants out there, it’s a 3840 x 2160 pixel display whose recognised standard is actually called UHD, rather than 4K. It’s ‘ultra high definition’, if you’re wondering what the U stands for.

The question is: what is the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium’s ultra-high resolution display good for? And is it worth valuing over the 3D Touch of the iPhone 6S Plus or the curve of the Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+?

What is the 4K screen good for?

Other than that now-common QHD displays are already incredibly sharp, the contentious part of the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium’s screen is what it doesn’t display at 4K all the time. Most of the time it’s actually 1080p.

To get proper 4K resolution you need to watch 4K video or look at high-resolution photos using the preinstalled Photos and Video apps. I tried some sample 4K footage really designed to flaunt 4K TVs with the Sony video app and, sure enough, it looks incredibly detailed.

It also looked sharper than the same video played through MX Player, a great free Android video player, which plays the footage back at 1080p. Is it something you’d appreciate while watching the clip normally? A little, if you try.

Related: Sony Xperia Z5 camera features explored

Xperia Z5 Premium

As with 4K TVs, really well-recorded 4K footage played back on a screen with high-enough contrast can make 2D content look almost 3D. There was a bit more of that ‘3D’ sense at 4K than 1080p, although I can’t say whether a QHD (the resolution of the Galaxy S6 Edge+ and LG G4) video might have exactly the same effect. The Sony Xperia Z5 Premium never uses that in-between resolution.

I’m also giving the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium the best chance possible by using 4K test footage. This stuff invariably features either intense macro-style nature shots or, in this case, wide depth of field shots of cities, making the most of every tiny window in every building.

Actual films tend to emphasise detail much less, and use much narrower depth of field a lot of the time. Especially if you're not watching a Transformers-grade CGI fest. Also, the difference in sharpness was only clear on close inspection. And it did seem more like ‘bonus sharpness’ than ‘bonus detail’.

Related: Best phones 2015

Xperia Z5 Premium 3

Real-life effects

How close do you need to be to appreciate it?

I actually tried this out, sitting at home where I normally watch films to see how close I’d have to get the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium so that its field of view was the same as my TV. It was around 20cm. Pretty damn close, and far closer than I ever hold the phone when watching something.

We have to hand it to Sony, though: it’s the only phone that can actually make full use of 4K quality video right now. And that is pretty cool.

The 4K missing links

Here’s where I have to take a step back and assess what benefits it loses out on. The first real shame is that there are no VR applications for the expanded resolution. Not yet, anyway.

This is the one area where the bonus pixels would come in really handy. As of late 2015 in the pre-Oculus Rift, pre HTC Rift age, every take on VR looks quite pixellated. Things like Samsung Gear VR and the endless Google Cardboard headsets all use your phone’s display, and are therefore limited to, max, 2560 x 1440 pixels. Even that looks a bit blocky.

You may not be able to tell the difference between QHD and UHD on a 5.5-inch screen at 30cm, but you sure as heck will when the screen is blasted up to fill 90 per cent of your field of view.

Related: What is 4K and UHD?

Xperia Z5 Premium 9

The specific areas mentioned earlier: the Sony video and photo apps are the only places where 4K is used. Everything else is rendered at 1080p “or less”, according to a Sony rep I talked to. The “or less” part may get you worrying, but it seems like pretty much everything that happens while you’re actively using the phone is 1080p. Bar those few 4K bits.

What this means is most of the places where you might initially head for 4K video are blocked off. Netflix does not stream at 4K. Neither does YouTube, even though it has absolutely loads of full-on 4K content you can load on your probably-totally-not-4K laptop.

Not fair, is it?

Related: Netflix 4K review

Netflix no

We can’t really blame Sony for this. None of these services are geared to deliver 4K content to mobile devices, and probably won’t be for an awfully long time.

A reliable 4K steam over mobile internet? Good luck with that one. Even when/if Netflix uses it for phones, in most areas the reliability/speed of your mobile internet would probably see Netflix’s clever adaptive video quality system slip back to a lower-resolution feed.

Games aren’t 4K either. They’re (largely) 1080p once more, and current games just wouldn’t have the right assets to render at 4K even if Android or the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium allowed it.

Xperia Z5 Premium 7

A look in the back room

Google’s own developer blog tells you a lot about how most Android games/apps are devised. Even though Android Marshmallow, the version that comes after the Android 5 Lollipop used by the Premium right now, does support 4K screens, the highest pixel density the ecosystem is really designed to cater for is around 640ppi.

This is what Google calls an “extra-extra-extra-high-density” device, but it’s still way off the 806ppi the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium delivers. It’s “we’re gonna need a bigger boat” time.

Neither Android OS or app ecosystem is prepared to deal with a 5.5-inch 4K screen. Simple as that. So even if there were no issues with system-level support or battery life, the interface of Android, apps and games would suffer from loads of scaling issues. Buttons would likely look tiny, with other visual elements really designed to be seen on a bigger display.

This is why Sony shoehorns 4K in with its minimal third-party implementation. It was really the only way for Sony to proceed without making a borderline unusable phone. Sony claims battery life was the issue, but there are loads of other important issues to consider too.


Upscaled apology

However, there is another side to Sony 4K. It also upscales lower-resolution content to suit the display. It has to, otherwise when the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium shows the Android OS at 1080p, it’d only take up a quarter of the screen.

The most basic kind of upscaling would involve taking 1080p content and displaying four pixels for every one. As I mentioned at the beginning of this article, the Premium is the equivalent of four 1080p screens.

In order to make the claim of turning things like Netflix into “near-4K” quality, what it needs to do is to extrapolate the extra detail a 4K source might have by ‘making up’ the extra three pixels (per pixel) of information based on the surrounding pixels we do have concrete information for when using a 1080p source.

So does it make Netflix 1080p look like 4K? No more than the display sharpening on LG’s flagship phones does, to my eyes. Once again, it’s very easy to overstate what Sony’s doing here. After all, the QHD Samsung Galaxy S6 phones and the LG G4 up scale 1080p content too, don’t they?

That’s a rhetorical question, by the way.

I also found that the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium’s home screens look a tiny bit soft compared with a QHD phone. This suggests that, here at least, the upscaling may work by simply filling up spare pixels with in-between colour shades rather than using them to increase the sharpness of outlines and fine details with a more detail-oriented upscaling algorithm.

Why are my screenshots only 1080p?

I did try to have a closer look at what the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium is really doing, to get a direct feed of screenshot renders 4K compared to 1080p. However, Sony has a get out of jail free card.

Android 5.1 Lollipop can only actually output screenshots at 1080p. And I doubt whether a system-level screenshot would show what the phone’s screen ‘brain’ is up to anyway.

I’ve had to rely on my eyes here, and I find the impression of sharpness throughout the system is actually a bit less than some QHD phones. The uses for it are pretty limited. Have a giant store of 4K movies you want to play on a phone? You also need to consider you’re limited to the codec support of the Sony Videos app, which may not cover all the picks in your collection.

We'll probably see several more 4K phones over the next year or so. But the Sony Xperia Z5 Premium doesn't make the best case for them. Uses are limited and it doesn't explore the most obvious use for an intensely high PPI screen, virtual reality. Not yet, anyway.


December 7, 2015, 7:05 pm

if the viewer does not know which is which (i.e. the phones are masked off so that only the screen is visible) and they are viewed in the normal way, can a selection of people guess which is which with better than 50% accuracy?

I ask because as soon as you know which is which, with the best will in the world, it is no loger possible to give an unbiassed response.

Of course those who buy the phone will know what it is, so maybe the bias will work in their favour and they will be genuinely convinced of its superiority. Just like people who know they spent £100+ on digital audio cables know absolutely that they sound better.

Prem Desai

December 7, 2015, 7:20 pm

I wonder is the review would have read differently if the display was made a 'fruity' company instead?

Personally, a HD screen on such a small screen is sufficient for me - I'd rather have the longer battery life and lower cost of handset.


December 8, 2015, 2:35 am

at least andrew tries to explain the 4K definition and applications limitations for what it is instead of trying to downplay its importance or usages. good article finally without bias. i own the premium and its really good. for those of you who are undecided, try it, you won't regret it. one of the best phones out there now.


December 8, 2015, 3:54 pm

I can assure you it'd a pure brain parp typo. It's annoyingly easy to write the wrong one. When you're me, at any rate.


December 8, 2015, 4:00 pm

Then you get to a point of judging a little more based on performance in more challenging situations, such as in bright sunlight and in darker rooms. I'm personally not resolution obsessed in any area anyway. Always cared more about black level/contrast TVs, sensor size in cameras etc.

While resolution increases have been some of the most exciting screen changes in, say, 2010-2013, the PPI obsession is doing noone any favours. It's funny how just a few years ago almost NO-ONE was using that metric in reporting on consumer tech.


December 8, 2015, 4:02 pm

Given I've preferred Samsung's recent OLED screens over Apple's ones... maybe not. Who knows though eh, the bias virus is strong.


December 9, 2015, 7:24 pm

If I want to view a small portion of an image, surely (depending on the image source) I will get a better result with a higher resolution screen.


All Things 3D

January 10, 2016, 4:56 am

Sony seems to be indicating you can see their #360Video of a ski slope using 12 Z5s on YouTube in 4K with the Z5 Premium. Have you tried it and can let me know if it makes difference. Also, do you know if subpixel is RGB or Pen-Tile. If RGB, this in itself will make this incredible sharp. Samsung did create an RGB OLED for the Note 3, but is now using the Pen-Tile again.

On another note. Most of the VR viewers use plastic molded lenses that in my opinion don't even do QHD justice, let alone a UHD screen. This is the reason my #NEODiVR "Loupe" (http://neodivr.com/loupe ) to be launched on Indiegogo very soon will be the brightest, clearest and widest FOV experience you will experience on your phone.


January 28, 2016, 9:42 am

really enjoyed your article. By accident, I managed to purchase the first part of my next system. (Amazon had a Christmas Lightning Sale on a ViewSonic 4k monitor, but I didn't realize I'd only be able to use limited features until I upgraded.

Now, I'm ready to upgrade, but rather than upgrade, I think it's time to get my next system. Some companies have websites that let you answer questions then get shown systems that match those answers.

I'm the type of person who likes to look at the price/performance/cost point. I tend to buy before the huge increase in slope. Buy on the gentle slope, not on the steep slope.


Muhammad Yasir

February 25, 2016, 2:28 pm

can anyone tell me who made the screen ?

comments powered by Disqus