Home » Opinions » Intel Pentium D & Pentium 4 670 » New Intel Platforms

New Intel Platforms

More interesting though were the subjective tests. What I did was to run a full scan of Norton Anti-Virus, convert an album of tracks from MP3 to 320Kbps AAC, re-encode a DivX movie using Dr DivX into a more compressed file, playback a move file and then attempt to launch and play Half-Life 2.

On the Pentium D I was able to do this and switch between the game and desktop. It took Half-Life 2 a long time to load but once it got going the game was playable, without dropped frames. (This was with a GeForce 6800 GT installed).

Performing the same tasks on the 3.8GHz however, when I tried to launch Half-Life 2, Task Manger revealed that I had run out of CPU cycles. Once iTunes had finished encoding, Half-Life2 then launched, but wouldn’t play smoothly. Once I shut down the other tasks it was smooth as silk.

This proved to me quite comprehensively the benefits of dual-core and seeing it make a real difference was quite satisfying.

But what of pricing for the CPUs? In quantities of 1,000, (which admittedly isn’t much use to the end user) the Pentium 670 (3.8GHz) costs $851 and for the Pentium D 820 (2.8GHz), you'll have to fork out $241, moving up to $316 for the 830 (3.0GHz) and $530 for the 840 (3.2GHz).

Based on the benchmarks and my subjective tests, I know which processor I’d prefer – it’s the dual-core, and for most people I don’t think the faster but less agile Pentium 4 is going to find many end user customers, especially considering that it costs so much more.


The Pentium 4 670 is just more of the same and is expensive to boot. The Pentium D however, is a decent introduction to dual-core from Intel, and for most consumers it will be the better choice by far. It's clear that AMD's X2 is a far better performer, but it also costs a lot more. Ultimately, with Intel's projected pricing, we could see entry level dual core PCs sooner rather than later.



You have exceeded your hourly limit of requests

comments powered by Disqus