Home » Opinions » Google Nexus 7 vs Amazon Kindle Fire HD » Google Nexus 7 vs Kindle Fire HD - Speakers, Connectivity and Verdict

Google Nexus 7 vs Kindle Fire HD - Speakers, Connectivity and Verdict


Google Nexus 7 - microUSB

Kindle Fire HD - HDMI output, microUSB

The Google Nexus 7 keeps its connectivity options very simple. There's a microUSB port, used for transferring files and charging the battery, and little else. Ok, there is a headphone jack too.

Kindle Fire HD vs Nexus 7 3

Amazon's Kindle Fire HD doesn't add a great deal more, but it does offer a microHDMI video output, for direct connection with a TV or monitor. This ups its credibility as a multimedia device significantly.


Google Nexus 7 - stereo, dual speakers, poor placement for stereo image

Kindle Fire HD - stereo, quad speakers, decent placement for stereo image

One area where the Kindle Fire HD clearly beats the Google Nexus 7 is in internal speaker design. The Google Nexus 7 has two speakers that sit on the bottom of the tablet. Even if they pipe out stereo audio, there's not much chance of anyone being able to discern much of a stereo effect.

Kindle Fire HD vs Nexus 7

The Kindle Fire HD's quad speakers

Amazon has put a lot more effort into the placement of the speakers in the Kindle Fire HD. They sit within a plastic strip on the back of the tablet, with two speakers at each end. Using dual drivers for each side of the stereo output should not only increase body and volume, but also should help avoid the ill effects of resting a palm over the speaker grille. Well done, Amazon.


Google Nexus 7 - 8/16GB, non-expandable

Kindle Fire HD - 16/32GB, non-expandable

The Amazon Kindle Fire HD wins the storage battle, there's no doubt about that. Offering double the memory at the same price, and double the maximum capacity, the Kindle Fire HD can fit a whole load more movies in its memory banks. The low-end 8GB Google Nexus 7 will only be able to hold around five films, and that's at SD resolution.

Neither tablet offers expandable memory, though. Their companies are a little too intent on encouraging you to use their own movie services to let you jam a massive downloaded movie collection on the tablet easily.


Google Nexus 7 - Tegra 3 1.3GHz quad-core, GeForce graphics

Kindle Fire HD - TI OMAP 4460 1.2GHz dual-core. PowerVR graphics

The Amazon Kindle Fire HD processor has been upgraded since the days of the first-generation Kindle, with a faster 1.2GHz clock speed. However, it really doesn't sound too impressive next to the quad-core processor of the Google Nexus 7. We get the feeling Amazon looked at what it needed the Kindle Fire HD to do, and specc'd it accordingly.

Kindle Fire HD vs Nexus 7 4

It's the same processor that features in the Samsung Galaxy Nexus, which in the fast-paced smartphone world is getting on a bit. In benchmarks, it certainly isn't capable of keeping up with the quad-core Tegra 3. It can, however, handle some pretty neat-looking 3D games.

Battery Life

Google Nexus 7 - 8 hours (video), 4,326mAh

Kindle Fire HD - 11hr (claimed)

Battery stamina is a tricky one to measure when you have sets to data that don't quite line up. Our own video test of the Google Nexus 7 showed that it managed a little over eight hours when playing a looped video. Google claims it'll handle up to 10 hours of web browsing, which seems a reasonable enough claim. Amazon seems to suggest the Kindle Fire HD will last a bit longer though - 11 hours.

However, it hasn't yet revealed any proper capacity details, just the hour figure. The Nexus 7 uses a 4,326mAh battery, and we expect the Kindle Fire HD's module will be eerily similar. The first Kindle Fire has a 4400mAh battery.


Google Nexus 7 - Front-facing camera only, 1.2MP

Kindle Fire HD - Front-facing camera only, "HD"

Amazon and Google kept things sensible with cameras. The Kindle Fire HD and Nexus 7 have just one camera each, designed to be used for video chatting over Skype and the like.

Skype Kindle Fire HD

Asus says that the omission is partly down to cost, but we like to think that it's a choice of taste too. Cameras on tablets are kinda lame - we all know it's true.


Tablets that are at the same time quite different and eerily similar, we think that both the Amazon Kindle Fire HD and Google Nexus 7 are rather fantastic. Great screens, great value and enough grunt under the bonnet to keep things ticking over nicely virtually ensure them a good reception.

In pure value terms, the improved speakers and greater storage of the Kindle Fire HD mean it's a bit more attractive to tech novices. However, real gadget lovers will appreciate having the full Android Jelly Bean OS to play with, and access to Google Play over the Amazon Appstore.


September 9, 2012, 3:47 pm

<p>The Kindle Fire ditches all of Google's apps not to mention a number of other ones some people will want. Its app store is clearly inferior.</p><p>And what about its proprietary browser that monitors the websites visited by users? There are also reports that Amazon wants $15 to remove embedded advertising. That's an insult.</p><p>The Kindle Fire is not the unalloyed joy some journalists seem to think.</p>


September 9, 2012, 7:31 pm

<p>The public needs a tablet that breaks the mould, and offers something novel and interesting. At the moment, all Android tablets are virtually identikit products with the same chipsets. Granted, innovation is hampered by the lack of breakthroughs in technology at the moment, but as with smart phones, all tablets are offering virtually the same feature-set, so obviously the cheapest product like Google's or Amazon's 7 inch offerings are going to be the most successful in the long run.</p>

Anthony Coons

May 31, 2013, 1:38 pm

<p>Nexus has cloud storage options, Kindle does not..... The author clearly did not do the research required.... at least in the storage part of the review.<br></p>


September 4, 2013, 4:50 am

<p>What if we just overwrote the internal memory of a kindle with Windows XP or W8? I am not a specialist, could I still run and access, books, music, video and even skype via XP or W8 on KFire technology?- is their anyone out there who can tell me if I could via 32GB Fire - scrub the OS then rewrite with Windows WP - which could give me access to books, moves, skype and email using Amazon hardware with Microsoft technology that I have on all of my other Windows devices?</p><p>Question: when most businesses in the world use Microsoft = why do I hear so many journalists/academics who seem to love apple down cry MS at every turn? I own 71 terminals that run on MS technology and we apply security updates every week for always and it's included in their licensing price..</p><p>What is the difference PLEASE, and why does the business world rely on Microsoft to do business - and why does the Media World prefer Apple?</p><p>No - Left V Right if it is possible please - I've been around long enough to know bullshit when I hear it - why are the "OS" (good, eh?) different and apart from that I own both but only use MS Tech and Servers for for business, why is Apple OS so important?</p><p>Could a technologist conversant in both technologies (with no outside interests) explain the differences please?</p><p>Thank you in advance.</p>


September 4, 2013, 9:03 am

<p>TrulyDISQUSted</p><p>hey I follow your posts on disqus from the telegraph so I thought I would reply to this one.</p><p>Microsoft have a version for tablets but there are very manufacturers that are pushing it.</p><p>They have their own version:-</p><p><a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Microsoft-Surface-Windows-32GB-Tablet/dp/B00A8N5ELY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1378285144&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=microsoft+tablet" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.co.uk/Micros...</a></p><p>Dell have a version:-</p><p><a href="http://www.dell.com/uk/p/xps-10-tablet/fs?dgc=ST&amp;cid=41141&amp;lid=1069630&amp;acd=239715600820560" rel="nofollow">http://www.dell.com/uk/p/xps-1...</a></p><p>My gut feeling is they are simply not marketing hard enough.</p><p>And yes in theory I expect windows RT could could work on kindle Fire hardware but it would take a lot of work with making the hardware compatible. This is usually undertaken by the hardware manufacturer.</p>

comments powered by Disqus