It is finally here, the long awaited Socket 939 Athlon 64 platform in all its glory. But what does it bring with it and does it live up to the hype? So far there has been a lot of speculation about the support of unbuffered dual channel memory, which should boost the performance of the Athlon 64 close to the level of the high-end FX range of processors and possibly beyond.
Socket-939 is the new consumer level socket for all future Athlon 64 processors, although, so far AMD has not officially declared what will happen to Socket 754, but the rumour is that this will become the new budget platform. Apart from unbuffered dual channel memory support there are very few changes, but those with earlier Athlon 64 processors will notice that the cache has been cut in half. You only get 512KB, compared to the 1MB seen on the 3200+ and 3400+. This shift will happen all across the board and only the FX parts will now ship with 1MB of cache.
Apart from the 3800+ and 3500+ Socket 939 parts, AMD is also launching a new FX-53 part for Socket 939. There is also a new Socket 754 chip, the 3700+ - weâ€™ll be bringing you a review of a PC based on this chip very soon.
The HyperTransport bus has also been given a boost, up from 1.6GHz to 2GHz, which should have an impact on performance for onboard Gigabit Ethernet and other high bandwidth subsystems. This is however chipset dependant, but the MSI 6702E motherboard supplied to test the processors on is based on the VIA K8T800Pro chipset, which supports the faster HyperTransport bus.
AMD supplied us with an FX-53 and a 3800+ to have a look at, so this article will give you a good idea of how the different processors will perform under similar circumstances. Both processors are clocked at 2.4GHz, which is 50MHz slower than the 3700+ Socket 754 part. This might seem strange, but AMDâ€™s reasoning is that the extra memory bandwidth and the faster HyperTransport bus should more than make up for the slightly slower CPU frequency.
Other improvements will follow later this year, such as PCI Express support, since this is limited to chipset support and no announcements have been made so far from any of the chipset vendors when such a product will be finalised. There is of course still support for AMDâ€™s Coolâ€™nâ€™Quiet technology that allows the processor to slow down if it is not fully utilised and thus produce less heat which in requires less active (slower and quieter) fans.
AMD also claims that a new feature will be available when Microsoft releases Service Pack 2 for Windows XP, which is what AMD calls Enhanced Virus Protection or EVP. This will however work with any Athlon 64 processor and is not limited to the new Socket 939 models. So how does EVP work? Well, according to the information that AMD supplied us, when enabled, EVP sets a part of the system memory aside as â€œdata onlyâ€ memory. This prevents any code resident in those memory areas from being executed as it can only be read or written to. This means that memory overflow viruses will not affect a system with EVP enabled.
How well this will work in practice and how many such viruses there are out there is something we will see when Service Pack 2 arrives later this year. It is a good initiative by AMD, but most viruses are far more complex these days, but anything that helps protect your PC is a good thing.