Home / Opinions / What is 4K TV and Ultra HD? All you need to know about 4K

What is 4K TV and Ultra HD? All you need to know

John Archer



Everything you need to know about 4K and UHD

The world of TVs has moved on a lot in the last year. There are new technologies and certifications, all aimed at helping TV tech take the next leap forward. They all carry snappy acronyms like HDR and BT.2020. The one you need to look out for is '4K'.

There has been talk of 4K for years, but it's no longer just something for the tech-minded early adopters. This advancement has properly hit the mainstream. It is now an important new standard.

How important? Netflix has been hard at work pushing 4K for over a year and the Sky Q now pushes 4K to a whole new segment of mainstream TV viewers in the UK. Amazon's latest Fire TV provides another accessible entry point to UHD content. Then there's the new Xbox One S, which brings the 4K love-in to games too.

Related: Stranger Things season 2

At CES 2016, all the big manufacturers like Samsung to Panasonic unveiled new 4K TVs. Most of them are have the new Ultra HD Premium certification, which you can read all about in our helpful guide: 'What is Ultra HD Premium?'

We're bound to see even more announcements at the forthcoming CES 2017 show as well.

With all that in mind, we thought we'd have a crack at compiling an ultimate guide on 4K. Here are some of the most common 4K-related questions, to save you a load of time and effort when buying a new TV.

Video: Trusted Explains... All you need to know about TVs

Q: What exactly is 4K?

A: 4K, also known as Ultra HD, refers to a resolution of 3,840 x 2,160 pixels. That's four times the 1,920 x 1,080 pixels found in your full HD TV.

Q: What is the difference between 4K and Ultra HD?

A: While 4K is the more commonly used term, some brands prefer to call it Ultra HD, or UHD for short. Technically, there is a difference.

Used correctly, 4K describes the 4,096 x 2160 resolution first introduced in digital cinemas. UHD refers to the 3,840 x 2,160 resolution you'll find in 16:9 ratio TVs, which is what you actually take home.

That means 4K is the wrong term for 3,840 x 2,160 displays and content, but it is used so often that the distinction has been all but lost. For most people, the two terms are interchangeable.

Related: Netflix vs Amazon Video - which streaming service deserves your cash?

What is 4k TV Ultra HD?

Q: Is 4K actually any good?

A: While 4K has its detractors, we’re big fans. The extra resolution of 4K images adds better definition and clarity to the picture. The result is images that look incredibly life-like, more like looking through a window than watching TV.

4K is especially effective on very large screens – so ideally you’ll go for a 65-inch set or even bigger. That said, we’d argue that 4K resolution clearly improves picture quality at pretty much any screen size. The effect is more noticeable if you're moving to 4K from a TV of the same size. Let's say you have a 50-inch HD TV and you upgrade to 4K: you are cramming four times the number of pixels into the same amount of space. That makes for a noticeably denser picture with finer detail.

Don't just take our word for it: 4K is considered by the film-making community as being able to reproduce the sort of resolution and ‘finish’ you get with 35mm film.

Some film studios are even talking about 8K, and LG showed off its first 8K TV at CES 2016. That's overkill, and this standard won't attain mainstream acceptance (or affordability) any time soon. You're safe to go ahead with your 4K TV purchase.

Q: Do I need to sit nearer my TV to benefit from 4K?

A: To get the best from 4K, it is recommended that you sit closer to your screen than you would with with HD TVs. The extra resolution and increased pixel density means you can sit further forward without spotting individual pixels. And filling up more of your field of view makes for a more immersive experience.

There are ‘scientific’ charts in circulation suggesting that you must sit extremely close to appreciate the extra resolution at all.

While we’d agree sitting close gives you the most impact, we reject the notion that you get no benefit at all from more distant viewing positions. You still perceive more depth, colours still look more smoothly rendered, and objects within the picture still look more solid and three-dimensional.

Related: Best TV Deals

4K packs in four times the number of pixels as Full HD / 1080p.

Q: Is a 4K TV all I need to start watching 4K?

A: No. While your 4K TV will use processing to upscale HD and standard definition pictures to its 4K pixel count, you will still want a native 4K source. Examples include 4K streaming services like Netflix and Amazon, as well as Ultra HD Blu-ray players.

Related: Ultra HD Blu-ray: The ultimate guide to 4K Blu-ray movies

Q: What 4K content can I watch?

A: Until recently the short answer to this was ‘not a lot’. Then answer became 'not a lot but there's more coming soon'. Now there is plenty of 4K content.

The most important 4K option is Netflix. The subscription on-demand service currently carries a growing library of TV series and films you can stream in 4K for £8.99 per month (up from £5.99). In terms of TV, Breaking Bad and House of Cards have been joined by the likes of Marco Polo and The Blacklist. UHD films include The Amazing Spider-Man, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon and Jerry Maguire, among others. You also get a few nature documentaries.

Amazon Prime Instant Video also offers some 4K content free of charge, including original Amazon series Mozart in the Jungle, Extant, and Transparent, though only on select TV sets from Sony, LG and Samsung.

Otherwise your main source of 4K content is the internet, predominantly via YouTube and a handful of dedicated 4K sites such as hd-trailers.net and demo-uhd3d.com. You can download files from these, transfer them to USB drive, and play them directly into your TV (so long as your TV is compatible with the video encoding format of the clip you want to watch).

BT has also has a 4K channel - BT Sport Ultra HD. As the name suggests, this is a sports channel (read further down for more information about sports) and it shows Premier League, FA Cup and Champions League football along with Aviva Premiership rugby. You'll need one of BT's Ultra-HD boxes to take advantage of the service though.

There are a couple of other boxes too that'll help fill your screen with glorious 4K. The most notable is the Android TV toting Nvidia Shield. This box will stream 4K Netflix and retails for £149. Amazon also do a Fire TV 4K box for £79, though it's not very good.

Last October, Roku announced a new 4K-capable streaming box of its own. The Roku 4 has launched in the US but isn't out yet in the UK, although it should be along soon, and it'll cost you £100. The company also announced a new 4K TV which will debut later this year.

Finally, Sky's Sky Q Silver box and Sky Q service, which has added 4K content since launch. You can watch many films and TV shows in 4K, while most Premier League football games are broadcast in 4K now.

Related: 10 reasons you'll want to upgrade to Sky Q

LG TVLG launched the 65G6 4K OLED TV at CES 2016

Q: Do all 4K TVs support 4K streaming?

A: No, not all of the older ones do. None of 2013’s 4K TVs can handle Netflix’s 4K streams, due to them not being able decode the HEVC video format Netflix has adopted. Not all of 2014’s 4K TVs can handle Netflix 4K either, with sets from Philips and Toshiba unable to cope with Netflix 4K (Panasonic added such support for its AX802 range late in the year).

The majority of 4K TV sets from reputable manufacturers released in 2015 support Netflix 4K streaming, however, so if you've bought one recently you should be okay. The 2016 TVs are the first batch of TVs where 4K support is prevalent.

Philips (a manufacturer that hasn't been great with Netflix 4K support) also supplies the UHD 880 4K, a media streamer that adds such support to its non-compatible TVs. Sony has one too in the Sony FMP-X5, which can enable Netflix 4K streaming on older Sony 4K TV sets for around £350.

Indeed, Sony is one of the biggest supporter of 4K so far, with an available library of a couple of hundred 4K films.

It must be stressed that not being able to play Netflix 4K doesn’t automatically preclude a TV from being able to play future alternative 4K streaming services that might emerge. But it doesn’t exactly fill us with confidence…

Q: What broadband speed do you need to stream 4K?

A: Netflix and Amazon are the big names streaming 4K, and both services need a minimum of 15Mbps to do 4K. And your speeds need to remain consistently at or above that figure. As soon as you drop lower – due to high contention rates at peak usage times, say – the picture will slip back into HD mode. And don't worry if you start off with a blurry image: it's quite common for streaming services to start a programme at a low resolution and then bump it up to HD and UHD after the initial buffer.

To try and cover itself for this eventuality, Netflix actually says on its website that you need 25Mbps minimum. But we’ve confirmed with Netflix that a consistent 15Mbps is enough. It's worth bearing in mind that this means you need 15 to 25Mbps of spare bandwidth, so if someone else is using your Wi-Fi, you'll need to have that amount of bandwidth free after you account for the other person's usage.

Compression techniques improve all the time, so it’s possible you may in the future need slightly lower broadband speed to experience 4K on Netflix or other rival 4K streaming platforms. But bear in mind that high levels of compression inevitably negatively affect picture quality, so if you’re serious about 4K a fast broadband connection is a must.

What is 4k TV Ultra HD?House of Cards was the first 4k series available made available to stream, via Netflix.

Q: What is UHD Blu-ray?

A: We've got a detailed breakdown of UHD Blu-ray which you can check out for a full rundown of the new format. In short, Ultra HD Blu-ray discs have a much larger capacity than standard Blu-ray discs, and as such can carry the information needed to store 4K video.

CES 2016 saw several new Ultra HD Blu-ray players announced, including Panasonic's DMP-UB900. Then came the Samsung UBD-K8500. Sony has yet to announce its own challenger, but Microsoft provides an affordable alternative in the Xbox One S, which plays 4K Blu-rays alongside games.

The discs will certainly cost you, as confirmed by the recent news that UHD Blu-rays could go on sale for as much as £30 for new releases.

Q: What connections do I need to watch 4K?

A: We’d love to say ‘an HDMI socket’ and leave it at that, but wouldn’t you know it, it’s just not that simple.

The issue here is that not all HDMI sockets are equal. There have been multiple versions/standards of HDMI since the digital connection first appeared, with the latest v2.0 HDMI specification being defined specifically with 4K feeds in mind.

The most significant advantage of v2.0 HDMIs from a 4K perspective is that they support increased data bandwidth, and so enable playback of 4K feeds with full (so-called 4:4:4) colour sampling at frame rates of up to 60fps. The previous v1.4 HDMIs only support 4K feeds up to 30fps.

HDMI sockets made to the v2.0 level have only really entered the TV manufacturing stream last year. Some older 4K sets were able to upgrade their v1.4 HDMIs via firmware to permit 4K streams at higher than 30fps frame rates, but only with reduced colour sampling.

Most of the major 4K TV brands now carry HDMI 2.0 in their current TVs – LG, Sony, Panasonic and Samsung are all onboard with it now, as is (finally) Philips.

Content mastered with High Dynamic Range (HDR) will be a big TV feature which you will see more and more of in 2016. HDR is a term to describe a series of trends which allow for pictures with vastly improved contrast and colour. In order to accomodate this, HDMI 2.0a was devised. This is not a connection change, so your current HDMI changes will still work and most TV manufacturers have said they can upgrade their products to HDMI 2.0a with a firmware update.

Related: HDR TV: What is it and why should you care?

With all this in mind it’s easy to understand why Samsung has opted to go with an external ‘One Connect’ connections box for its flagship UHD TVs, since these can be upgraded in future years as connectivity requirements change.

Because of the ongoing TV connection issues, don't rule out seeing more of those external 4K ‘receivers’ able to decode 4K streams and even download 4K titles on your TV’s behalf.

Q: Can I make my own 4K content?

A: Indeed you can. There are now domestic cameras out there capable of producing startlingly good 4K quality without costing the earth. Two of the best examples are the £1,500 Sony FDR-AX100 camcorder and the similarly priced (with lens) Panasonic DMC-GH4 camera.

Many modern smartphones are also capable of capturing 4K video, including Apple's iPhone 6S and iPhone 6S Plus. Of course, 4K recording has long been supported at the top end of the Android market, and current flagships such as the Samsung Galaxy S6, HTC One M9, and the Nexus 6P.

What is 4k TV Ultra HD?Want the ultimate in sound quality as well as a 4k picture? The Sony KDL-65X9005B set the standard.

Q: When will more commercial 4K content become available?

A: The good news is that more and more films and TV shows are now being made in 4K. So the source content is at least being created. It’s just a pity that distributing it seems so difficult. With the arrival of UHD Blu-ray, and the increasing sophistication of Netflix and Amazon Video, we already have a lot more 4K content than we did this time last year.

What of 4K broadcasts? The BBC continues to test its own UHD broadcasts, but still doesn't feel that enough 4K TV sets are out there to justify a more meaningful push.

On a more positive note, Sky's 4K capable box Sky Q is now available, and 4K content has arrived. BT, for its part, has already released a 4K-capable box, which runs its BT Sport Ultra HD channel and Netflix 4K.

Other 4K options include the likes of the Ultraflix service. Launched in the US a year or so ago, and available across a number of 4K TV brands (including Sony and Samsung), it offers hundreds of hours of 4K content containing a mix of sports, concert, documentary and film. It's not the most polished or comprehensive of offerings, however.

One final potential 4K source to look out for are external HDDs, to which you can download 4K films. These are likely – in the short term, at least – to be offered as add-ons to specific brands of TV. Sony has had such boxes available for purchase with its 4K TVs in the US since 2013, offering a series of preloaded titles and the facility to download other titles later.

Samsung has launched a similar box in the UK. The UHD video pack offers owners of Samsung UHD TVs (it won’t work with other brands of TV) three pre-installed 4K movies and a bunch of demo material for £150.

Q: What's this about older 4K TVs not being able to handle sport?

A: Yes, about that. As is probably becoming eminently clear to you by this point in the article, anyone who became an early adopter of the 4K standard is, well, a little screwed. The constantly shifting goalposts of this new standard have rendered 2013 sets all but obsolete, and that's particularly the case if you watch a lot of sport.

Because early 4K TV sets can only render UHD content at 25fps, they won't be suitable for future 4K sports broadcasts. At least, not on Sky's service anyway.

Speaking at a conference in London last year, Sky's Chris Johns supplied the brutal truth: "If you bought a [4K] set in 2013 and early 2014, then sorry, it won't do sport. It'll only go up to 25 frames per second."

25fps is just peachy for most Hollywood films, which are shot at that frame rate. But sporting broadcasts benefit from the smoother action that much higher frame rates bring about, with 100fps here stated as the ideal.

Such a boost in frame rate requires newer, faster hardware -- a software update simply won't cut it. Hence the reason that your 2013 or even 2014 4K TV might not play future sporting content.

Samsung is one company that has provided a way out for 4K early adopters, but it involves plugging yet another box into your TV set. The UHD Evolution Kit costs around £400, and essentially acts as a hardware upgrade complete with quad-core processor and HDMI 2.0 connectivity.

It sucks for the early adopters, but that's generally the risk you take for getting on in Phase One of any new tech. The good news is that the dust is finally settling, and there are standards in place. If you buy a big-name 4K TV right now, you're unlikely to be stung.

Additional reporting by Joe Roberts and Jon Mundy

Matthew Salmon

May 3, 2013, 2:30 pm

Depends on how big a screen you're showing the image on tho..on a 30ft cinema screen 4K is great.. On a 50" telly its an unnecessary gimmick..


May 3, 2013, 5:15 pm

Actually, as John points, it's all about the distance you sit from the screen. At 1.5 the height of the screen, you can see the difference and there are plenty of other benefits - improved 3D - to consider as well.

Matthew Salmon

May 3, 2013, 10:07 pm

Think it has good application in home projectors and the high end.. but on which format do you deliver it to generate any mass appeal? Terrestrial broadcasts should be trying to get more 1080p channels out there - and until that happens no-one is going to support upgrading more than one channel to 4K. I think the masses are happy with just having a big HD flatscreen - and it'll take a real technological innovation in the physicality of the TV to make people dump them..just upping the resolution isn't it..

Jack Westrop

May 3, 2013, 10:45 pm

Nice read and I agree with pretty much every point. Nothing transforms your experience with a given device quite so much as a good quality screen, whilst that doesn't just refer to resolution, its an obvious and very important area to improve upon. That said there are limits, I really can't see the need for anything beyond 4k in places other than a cinema/enthusiast

Infact, 1080p for phones, 2560x1440p for all screens upto 27inch and 4k for everything else would be perfect


May 4, 2013, 2:27 am

well yes, people are happy with 1080p, but eventually 4k will become mainstream because it will be common more of a common spec. It's early adoption will be driven more by film enthusiasts though wanting to see films in their home the way they were mastered,

Gordon Kelly

May 4, 2013, 11:34 am

For me the biggest challenge for 4k is upscaling existing content. 1080p *just about* works, but 720p, 1080i and SD (99.9% of all broadcast content) look awful.

That said I am extremely enthused about the HEVC (High Efficiency Video Codec) which I think John is referring to here. That could lift a number of barriers to 4k's availability online and accelerate the web's take over of satellite and the traditional digibox. More here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...


May 4, 2013, 8:19 pm

Its time we unloaded our celluloid prejudice, forget the 35mm frame size with its puckered up little 5 micron photo-sites, and the old 24 fps. lets go to a large sensor with large pixels, twenty counts of AtoD, imaging at 72 fps and projecting at 72 fps. 8K Two 4K sensors off-set against each other will double the spatial resolution. I will build this camera, anyone on board?

Mike Ross

May 5, 2013, 3:12 am

A piece about 4K that mentions Sony 13 times and doesn't mention RED once? #wow #puff #crap

Muris Smajic

May 5, 2013, 6:55 am

4k is a fad. I bought a 720p Sony TV 8 years ago and only now I can use it to its full potential. There is not going to be any 4K content for at least a few years and I'm very happy to watch movies in 720p.

Maurice Samuels

May 6, 2013, 5:13 pm

I hear you ;) my BW TV with rabbit ears plays movies great!


May 7, 2013, 1:13 pm

Ah those silent movie days.....where have you gone?

Mojokiller ShiftTwo

May 9, 2013, 6:33 am

I have a question what about aspect ratio ???? Cuz 3840x2160 = 16/9
format and what about 2:35 films we would have to go back from 21/9 to
16/9 again?????


May 11, 2013, 9:26 pm



May 12, 2013, 1:28 am

I'll wait for 8K.

Joshua Paul

May 22, 2013, 5:47 pm

still don't care . More technology I see today the less I care about it . Prices today are overpriced and loaded with DRM and since media is connected to HDTV's and gaming I can't help but care less about it .

Brian Cotton

May 25, 2013, 6:09 am

No sir you are wrong. 4k is not a fad, its simply higher resolution. You clearly didn't read the article, or didn't comprehend what it entails. Never in the age of digital technology has their been a fad referring to higher resolutions and faster processing speeds. Your 720 TV is so dated its not even funny. For you to think the piece of technology you bought 8 years ago is relevant is funny. Does it work fine for you? Yes. But at that time do you think the manufacturers of your tv weren't working on higher resolutions? They were. And stubborn people that owned it at that time had your same uninformed arguement about 1080. Just so you know, and its not up to you or I, there will be an 8k TV coming out in the future soon. Remember 3G for your cell phone? At that time people said "why would they make 4g, mine works just fine." And here we are discussing a 5g speed that will be faster than wifi making cable useless. The moral of the story is don't attempt to justify your personal state of technology as a reflection of the industry. It's gonna keep moving forward wether you like it or not. Embrace it, hate it, do what you will, but just know that your 720 TV you mention will seem like a in a couple of years in comparison. And from the sounds of it yul be the guy saying, "I can still play pong on my Atari just fine, these play stations and xboxs do the same thing but cost a fortune more

Zach weatherford

May 30, 2013, 4:34 am

Thank you Brian Cotton for speaking the truth. I'm honestly beginning to almost hate people like "muris smajic" who seem to be against anything new or different from what they have or are used to. If everybody was like them we would still be reading by candle light. These people need to wake up and realize that the world is evolving whether they like it or not. They can either come out from under their rock and accept it and go with it or be left behind.


June 24, 2013, 4:09 am

I still got the my old heavy CRT RCA TV. It has a nice picture, obviously not comparable with HDTV, but at least I'll wait for a 4K. Glad I waited and I have the money to purchase it!! :)


August 16, 2013, 12:49 pm

Yea but having to sit ridiculously close to a tv to see a benefit isnt good. I love watching HD films and TV but I like to be able to sit a decent distance - and okay so there are allot more pixels on your screen but don't forget the naked eye can only pick up so much, and we are getting close to the max for tv's


August 21, 2013, 2:11 pm

This is ridiculous, it's easy to see the benefit of 4K on a 50 foot cinema theatre screen. But seriously, unless you own a 70inch TV and plan to sit 2 feet away from it you should just stick with your current 720/1080p TV and keep your money, unless you like bending over for the TV manufacturers... and if you were suckered into ponying up for 3D then I thought you would have learnt your lesson by now.

Don't believe me, do the math, oh wait, someone already did http://www.cnet.com.au/why-....


August 21, 2013, 6:08 pm

i'm waiting for 32K


August 22, 2013, 4:44 am

You're not too bright are you. experts have been to shows with side by side 65 inch tvs, hdtv vs ultra hd from fifteen feet away they have said the difference is obvious right away. Now, I know yu pulled that nonsensical two feet in front of a 70 inch screen out of your as*, but I think you should just go back to SD...HD is not that great. If you do decide not to do that, you are right...never upgrade to 4k or eventually 8k. Stick with HD, it is the best. lol..fkg moron.


August 22, 2013, 4:47 am

I prefer horse drawn carriages to them fancy automobiles...they'll never last.


August 22, 2013, 4:50 am

LoL...I say agree with the naysayers that say we are already maxed out on tv resolution. Awesome...you stick with that regular HD. In five to ten years when Im totally mezmorized by 8k tv, I can just laugh at the stupid people who dont like change.


August 22, 2013, 10:54 am

I think you've got it spot on, really. The biggest reason for mass adoption of HD TVs was not the resolution increase itself, but the fact that the technology was tied to the move from CRT to Plasma/LCD.

HD (and 4K, or course) is difficult to convey to a mass audience unless you directly show it to them, and even then, most people are stubborn enough to not acknowledge the huge difference. The sudden change in form factor that LCD brought with it, however, can be easily shown to anyone with a TV screen. The sudden change in aesthetics, size and style of new flatscreen TVs was undeniably a tangible improvement everyone agreed on. It certainly helps that LCDs and HD are pretty much synonymous with each other - you can't really get SD LCD TVs, and if you did, the average consumer probably wouldn't even notice the resolution difference unless it's pointed out to them.

Just changing the resolution of the current style of TVs won't be enough, as people will (again) refuse to acknowledge the difference in picture quality, based on this seemingly weird pride everyone has for their own furnishings - to the point where any technology change that isn't immediately noticeable in the physicality is deemed by the masses as a pointless innovation to increase cost.

comments powered by Disqus