Nokia Lumia 930: Camera

Michael Sawh

By Michael Sawh



Our Score:


Nokia Lumia 930: Camera

Nokia has been making a big push with smartphone camera technology since introducing its ‘PureView’ camera technology. It first turned up in the Symbian-running Nokia 808 before making its way into smartphones like the Lumia 1020, and as a flagship phone it's no surprise that it's included in the Lumia 930.

On paper the Lumia 930 matches the Lumia 1520’s camera. It has the same 20-megapixel resolution, half that of the 41-megapixel Lumia 1020, an f/2.4 aperture lens, 1/2.5-inch image sensor and a dual LED flash. While the Lumia 925 had a wider maximum aperture (f/2.0), the 930's sensor is larger and the 925 only shot at 8.7-megapixels. This should help when taking advantage of PureView's detail enhancing trickery.

Like the LG G3, there’s also optical image stabilization to reduce blur and keep things steady, unlike the S5 which relies on digital image stabilization and is not as effective at ironing out those shaky moments. There's no HDR mode, though, which is a serious omission given how useful a feature it can be.

Optical stabilization is also in tow for the 1080p Full HD video recording, while up front is a 1.2-megapixel camera capable of shooting a maximum 720p HD, which is more than suitable for Skype video calls.

Nokia Lumia 930 17

Camera App

Unlike the Lumia 1020, there’s just one camera app you need to worry about for taking pictures. It's relatively straightforward to use until you want to delve into the generous manual settings.

In the top left hand corner is the camera roll and over on the right are three circular icons letting you switch between camera, video recording and the smart mode, which unlike the 1020 is now built into the main camera app. Here is where you can shoot in burst mode to shoot 10 frames in quick succession and adjust those images with blur effects, for instance, although you'll usually see in a drop in image quality in this mode.

You are going to shoot most of your photos with the main camera mode and you have the option to press the screen or the dedicated camera button to take a shot. Above the main camera options are settings to apply a timer, add framing grids, capture high and low resolution copies of the image and turn on the Living Images feature. This essentially gives photos in your camera roll a HTC Zoe-style effect that’s not all that useful.

There’s also some nice tutorials to explain some of the key camera features and show the impact adjusting elements like shutter speed or the refocus on images.

Image Quality & Performance

If you don’t want to tinker around too much, it’s still possible to take good quality photos, though getting those great shots doesn't always happen on the first go. The 20-megapixel camera actually takes two images, a 5-megapixel and 16-megapixel image, giving you something that’s Facebook or Twitter-friendly and the other that should give you more detailed images you can access when you are connected to PC.

The problem with this is that, like the Lumia 1020, the extra processing time means the camera is a little sluggish. It means you can one moment shoot fantastic shots and others produce blurry or over exposed images at times — the kind of experience we'd sooner avoid on an expensive flagship smartphone.

Lumia 930 3

The camera really excels for close-ups and portrait shots, delivering sharp, detailed images. It even produces a slight bokeh (blurred background) effect in this shot. The colours are very accurate, too.

Lumia 930 5

But scenic shots from a distance are more of a challenge. As the image below shot in automatic mode shows, colours aren't all that punchy and the lack of an HDR mode really shows here. The sky above the stadium is totally overexposed — a decent HDR mode would really help here.

Lumia 930 7

Low-light performance is what the majority of the Lumia 930’s camera tech is geared towards, but it’s a mixed bag of results. In controlled close-up environments, as the image and comparison with other leading smartphones above shows, it maintains great detail. It's not as bright and accurate as the 1020, but it's much better than the LG G3 and very similar to the Galaxy S5.

But the moment there's motion in the scene it really struggles, which is frustrating if you're trying to take a photo when on a night out. This is the kind of area where the HTC One M8 excels.

As for video, we shot footage in well lit conditions and optical stabilization takes some time to adjust. Reviewing the footage on a computer doesn’t deliver fantastically sharp Full HD footage, either. What does impress is the sound pick up. Nokia includes four directional microphones that really give you sense of where the noises and voices are picked up from in the scene.

Nokia Lumia 930 9

We also played around with the new VideoTuner app Microsoft recently introduced to edit footage and basically have a bit more fun with your footage. You can trim footage, slow down the video and add music. Most of the adjusting involves swiping up and down on a bar and changes can be reset. Once you are done, you can save in small, medium, large video formats. Additionally, you can save in a Vine and Instagram-friendly format, though you still have to go into those apps to upload it.

Carrier pricing updates & information supplied by WhistleOut

pixelmike .

July 16, 2014, 6:41 am

Someone should be brave and make a thicker smaller phone with a decent battery..........


July 16, 2014, 11:01 am

The Xperia Z1 Compact is on my list for this reason. Why can't we get good spec phones without silly screens? And I'm talking silly as in size and resolution.


July 16, 2014, 11:03 am

Why do "Good noise cancellation" and "pleasantly surprised" equate to 6/10 for call quality? That suggest to me that the quality of phones calls on a phone is not good, and would put me off purchasing. But perhaps I'm old skool in wanting to use my phone to make calls...


July 16, 2014, 11:20 am

Why is the wireless charging and the bundled wireless charger not count as one of the "Pros"?

Monsieur de Comte Beaujangles

July 16, 2014, 11:43 am

Good points there dpanch. Also the Zperia Z2 is a square design and didn't get marked down for it. And we all know there aren't as many useless apps available for Win 8.1 - that's a decision we would be knowingly making if we opted to buy this phone.


July 16, 2014, 12:51 pm

This was the 4th or 5th review of the Lumia 930 I've read. It's completely subjective of course - the design is liked by some and not others, the battery is considered normal by some but poor by others. The recurring theme is the poor app store.

My phone life - 4 years with an iPhone 3G and 4, 2 years with a Samsung Galaxy S3 and now I'm moving to the Lumia 930. I've checked all the apps I use daily and they're all in the WP Store.

The dedicated camera button is a brilliant feature - so simple yet so rare to find. Also Windows Phone 8.1 is slick and simple like iOS...which is a good thing (for me).


July 16, 2014, 12:54 pm

I was looking at the LG G3...but a 5.5" screen was too much. The limit for me is 5" for a phone...after that I have to think about keeping it in my bag or leaving it at home and calling it a tablet.


July 16, 2014, 1:19 pm

I believe the Z2 is also thinner, though, which makes a difference when holding it.


July 16, 2014, 2:35 pm

similar here. I've been using the old HTC HD7 (when wp was first launched!) for 4 years now, and am desperate to upgrade. I don't bother with loads of apps tbh, and have an android tablet for most apps that I'm desperate to have, if at all. I like the simplicity, and the style of the UI.

Tim Sutton

July 16, 2014, 11:43 pm

None of the other reviews I've seen have had bad things to say about the call quality.

Anecdotally, my old Lumia 800 was great for the person I was calling while slightly too quiet in my ear for my liking, while my current Lumia 1520 is ridiculously good, like having the other person sitting on your shoulder.

Trusted Reviews does like to look for the negatives when it comes to Windows Phone, I tend to automatically add a mark to their score of any Windows Phone handset as compensation. That usually gives a more accurate picture!

Russell hawker

July 17, 2014, 10:10 am

Definitely worth checking the WP Store. I switched to Windows Phone earlier this year after checking the store and finding eveything i needed was there. Yes it is missing the 10,000 rubbish apps that Android and Apple have but if you can live without those, WP Store is fine.
Windows Phone is a slicker OS, less demanding and has less hardware requirements than Android or Apple. So 2.2ghz and 2Gb is over kill really.
Lack of HDR is not a major blow. It maybe something Nokia can implement with a firmware upgrade. At the end of the day its only a case of taking 3 images 1 stop apart and stacking them. No extra hardware required, just a software thing.


July 17, 2014, 10:52 am

Obviously the reporter has a fetish for Candy Crush and Kim Kardashians latest time waster! Mine arrived this morning and think its sublime!

Russell hawker

July 17, 2014, 12:39 pm

Quite envious but the 920 is still a great phone. Will have to wait a bit before i get the 930. Enjoy the 930.


July 23, 2014, 12:59 pm

This reviewer is obviously an Android fanatic.
Nokia were doing Swype gestured text messaging and 'drop down action centres' years ago, and probably pioneered these things but reviewer has to compare everything to Android OS as if they were doing it first.
I'd suggest to anyone to try out this phone and OS. It just feels so much more polished than any Android phone I've used and has the great build quality Nokia are reknowned for.


July 28, 2014, 8:54 am

Have had my 930 for over a week for now. The phone is amazing, light years ahead of the iPhone (yes I know trustedreviews love everything apple). The screen alone is a thing of beauty. The sound quality is so good I use it without headphones. Very comfortable in the hand, Nokia/Microsoft put a lot of effort into the ergonomics of this phone and it shows. As for the apps? There are fewer rubbish apps in the windows store, you do not need to wade through so much junk as you do on the iPhone and android phones. Most of the big name apps are there. But the best thing is that the big boys were slow to get apps out onto the windows phone, meaning independent developers got there first and produced a much better app. Pinterest for example, is ok on iPhone and windows phone but the app created before the official app came out is so much better and a joy to use. I wont even start on Cortana, which has leapfrogged siri by miles. I will say this, Cortana understands my London accent and understands language and does not need learned phrases. Cant wait for the UK Cortana which should be out this week.
In conclusion: ignore talk of missing apps, add two points to any review of windows phone.

Maurício Avellar

August 17, 2014, 9:39 pm

Let me see if I get it. Trusted reviews gave iPhone camera a 9/10 and the camera on the Lumia 930 an 8/10 and, as stated by 99% of the camera reviewers, the camera on the Lumia is way better than the one on the iPhone, let alone it allows you manual controls kind of like on a DSLR. So, I think just by having a bitten apple drawn on the back improves the score. Not to mention the design are so close, but the iPhone still got a higher score. Screen quality on the iPhone isn't excellent, I have one, it's good at best, one can easily see pixelated fonts, edges, corners, etc. throughout the whole ecosystem. Software and apps are better, call quality is excellent, performance is good with occasional hiccups, especially when trying to open many websites simultaneously, like I do all the time. When scoring about price, iPhone should get 1/10, because outside the US it costs more than a brand new motorcycle. Instead of buying an iPhone here, one could buy a Lumia 930 + Galaxy S5 or Sony Xperia Z2 or even the Lumia 1520. When comparing apps like Facebook, for instance, the one for Android is way ahead of the other 2 competitors (WIndows/iOS).


August 26, 2014, 11:11 am

The poor app store for WP phones is now a negative I simply just ignore. I've got all the apps I need on WP8.1. But however, to say that the battery is average?! I bet that's soley based on the battery size itself, and not the actual batterylife on the phone. I could get 2 days out of my 1020. The 930s I bought for my family has about 1/3 extra battery capasity. My sister (Who uses the phone alot for stuff like youtube and snapchat) told me she would have about 50% left by the end of the day.

I know for certain that S3 runs completely out of battery by 6-8 hours.

"Trusted Reviews" seems like yet another generic tech page that can't accept changes and innovation. This will therefore be the last time I visit this website. (Unless someone replies to this comment)


August 26, 2014, 3:32 pm

It might not matter to you but it's still a legitimate concern for anyone switching from Android or iOS, which most likely would be. Just because the apps you use are there, that isn't to say the apps that other people use will be.


August 26, 2014, 6:19 pm

it would in that case be an even greater concern for anyone who would be talked into buying an iOS or Android phone once they're used with the Windows Phone ecosystem.
There are plenty of that are truly unique to the WP store as well. And these apps wouldn't have a substitute of same quality on Android.
It's a pitty really, that many fanboys talk about specific games that aren't available on WP phones, as their concern for not switching to WP platform. It's like if they already know there's no other good excuse. It's not like if I couldn't do the same. I could easily list good games that aren't available on android (emphasis on "good").


August 27, 2014, 8:59 am

Given the relative market shares, it's far more likely someone would be moving from iOS/Android to Windows than the other way.


August 27, 2014, 9:13 am

Exactly! In the end, it's not about the app selection. But rather the current marketshare. And the market share doesn't reflect who makes the better phone, but rather, who is better at convincing people to buy their phone.
Because if it had actually been about who makes the better phone, Samsung wouldn't be the dominant android phone maker. HTC for instance makes phones that are way better than Samsung.
Android fanboys don't realize that they're ruining it for everyone by talking people into buying Samsung.


August 27, 2014, 11:45 am

I think you've missed my point a little.

Given most people won't be switching from WP to Android/iOS, whether WP apps are on either isn't all that important. Moreover, the respective app selections are so large and varied that you could probably find an equivalent and equally good apps on either of those platforms.

The same is not true when switching from Android/iOS to Windows Phone, which is why the relative lack of apps is legitimate criticism of the platform.

We're not saying Windows Phone is bad, but believing the app situation is a 'non issue' isn't credible and it's perfectly reasonable for us to make that point.

EDIT: I'd add this is less problematic when buying a cheaper phone where there is less demand for apps, which is probably why WP has been quite successful in the cheaper end of the market.


August 27, 2014, 7:25 pm

Let's emphasize on "We". A very huge majority on people who owns or buys a smartphones would have no issue. I was myself a hardcore android user and app developer. I invested alot in the Android ecosystem. And sure, I lost all everything I spent money on. But I had no issue finding alternatives on WP phone. For me, there was no issue with adapting to a new OS. But I surely can understand that some people may find it a bit hard.

I just really hate the fact that most of the dislike towards WP is due to Android fanboys spreading rumours. Like the dude at the store did almost everythign he could do discourage me from buying my 1020. He even went as far as saying the camera on 1020 was bad. Like, what the heck. I told him he just lost a customer, went to a rival store and bought my 1020.

When running tech websites, people aren't here to read your personal opinion and what you need. But rather what they may need, the majority. The truth is, most people don't care for installing dozens of launchers and try out a gazillion themes for their new launcher and keyboard. They don't need 500+ tic tac toe games, just 1.

Most people prefers having an extremely responsive and sleek looking UI. Check social media and News. Take good pictures and have a nice and simply way of editing their photos and/or just share the pic easily on social media. They would rather appreciate built-in cloud access. Have access to their word, excel and ppt documents through built-in solutions, and not try out and waste money on a dozen apps that render documents differently.

Heck, Android doesn't even have a disqus app. Wouldn't that be a relevant app for someone who browses through these websites?

Android phones are capable of doing tap-to-share. However, I've never seen a single Android user do it other than to show that they could do it. They still plug their phone to a computer or email it. I see WP phone users do tap-to-share frequently, because that's the OS itself being more user-friendly and intuitive.

And gosh, the clutter you end up accumulating on Android phones. Just how much of a relief it would be to many people if they had less clutter to deal with. My Dad may not be the most tech-savy person, but he likes to stay updated on such. And guess what, he loves WP phone. And this would be the great majority of smartphone users. They want to do stuff, without having to deal with clutter.

Prem Desai

August 30, 2014, 10:55 pm

I think the apps issue is real.

I still believe that Microsoft is 'the' software company and that Nokia is the 'phone' company and between the 2 of them, can knock out some pretty decent kit.

I really want to get a windows phone, but the lack of apps is stopping me - there are some pretty specific apps that I want, none of which are in windows store.

So hopefully things will change - in the meantime, I'm slumming it with my Android and iOS devices ......


August 31, 2014, 2:10 am

which apps? Before you name any bank apps, if they don't have an app for windows phone, is because they don't have much users and are less developed than the rest. Of that's the case, you should be considering to switch the bank and not hold it against WP.
I'll never understand people who would pick android so that they can do banking on it. The least secure platform of them all, not to mention how it's a device that's handled by many people. (Not saying you're one of them).
Which app are you missing? Are you sure you didn't find a substitute?

comments powered by Disqus