Home / Cameras / Camera / Nikon COOLPIX S2600 / Performance, Image Quality and Verdict

Nikon COOLPIX S2600 – Performance, Image Quality and Ver

By Paul Nuttall

Reviewed:

Summary

Our Score:

6

In use, the COOLPIX S2600 once again gives of signs of its low price tag and place at the budget end of the market. Although the camera features a start-up time in line with other compacts in the price range, the same can’t be said of the camera’s focus system.

In well-lit scenes the S2600 copes just about fine with focus – identifying the desired point promptly and accurately enough. However, as soon as you encounter an area of minimal contrast, or a dimly lit scene, it’s noticeable how the S2600 will begin to either hunt for focus or focus on the wrong area of the frame.

Nikon COOLPIX S2600 7

As mentioned earlier in the review, the COOLPIX S2600 features a low-resolution LCD screen and this is very noticeable in use – the screen is very difficult to see in bright light, and even when it is possible to see the screen it’s difficult to gain an accurate impression of the quality of the image.

With regards to the quality of the image, unfortunately this is another area in which the S2600 hardly excels, with the camera falling foul of a number of image quality issues.

The S2600 displays a limited dynamic range – although shadow detail is generally well preserved, highlights readily blow out frequently and therefore lose the photographer image detail.

The 5x optical zoom also isn’t with its flaws. Harsh fringing is evident in areas of high contrast, with objects bridging the two demonstrating an unhealthy outline of either purple or green depending on the side of the frame they sit.

Nikon COOLPIX S2600 9

It’s not all terrible news though with regards to image quality. Exposures are generally reliable – although with the tendency to blow highlights the camera could benefit from underexposing. Colour rendition is also pleasing, with the S2600 showing a good, natural palette in most shots.

ISO performance, however, is another area where the S2600 suffers. At settings of 400 and above noise hampers image quality to quite an extent, causing loss to fine detail. The settings of 800 and 1600 as so poor as to suggest they’re avoided all together.

Verdict

The compact camera market has transformed in recent years and, as a result, consumers are justified in wanting more for their money than ever before. This is worthy of consideration when assessing the S2600 and judging how well it delivers for its price tag. In spite of the reasonable specification and undeniably slim and compact body that will easily slip in to a pocket, there are too many flaws for the S2600 to come highly recommended. For example, the LCD screen is relatively small and of poor quality and a range of image quality issues are present. So while it’s not going to break the bank, the market is such at the moment that there are better compacts available for this price.

Jerome Nolas

May 1, 2012, 4:35 pm

Why did you block my comment? What's wrong with "IQ is so bad it must be North Korean edition...Cuban edition would make you happy? How about IQ is so bad they sent back from Korea back to Nikon...

Ed

May 1, 2012, 5:07 pm

Because I was a little suspicious of the number of comments you'd left in one fell swoop, and the North Korean comment in particular is not really appropriate. I may be light-hearted but it is ultimately racist and doesn't add anything worthwhile to the 'discussion'.

Jerome Nolas

May 1, 2012, 11:35 pm

I was so disappointed with pictures IQ I wrote what I wrote. I am the last person on this planet who would be a racist...that's all. Hope you understand.

Ed

May 2, 2012, 2:23 am

Fair enough. One day we'll get a good comments system that means such issues shouldn't be a problem in the future.

vipin 8051

September 21, 2012, 3:27 pm

I bought this camera a few days before.But i m very much disappointed with the Quality of Image.may better to buy any other camera other than this model.

hawk

July 12, 2013, 4:51 am

this is a pos. had it for 2 years & crap from day one. Will not buy a nikon, regardless of reviews, ever, as a protest.

Andrei

October 1, 2013, 4:46 pm

I had this for 3 weeks. I have no idea what quality the pictures are since I didn't get to make any... After 3 weeks sitting in the box I tried to charge the battery and was DEAD. My first and last Nikon ;)

Raghu

October 12, 2013, 4:53 pm

This model is having a problem of recharging battery once it is completely dried out.

shamsu tva

August 31, 2015, 10:51 am

i want buy second hand, how can i know when brought this one?

comments powered by Disqus