Home / Cameras / Camera / Nikon CoolPix L110 / Test Shots - ISO Performance

Nikon CoolPix L110 - Test Shots - ISO Performance

By Cliff Smith

Reviewed:

Summary

Our Score:

7

User Score:

Over the next few pages we show a range of test shots. On this page the full size image at the minimum and maximum ISO settings have been reduced to let you see the full image, and a series of full resolution crops have taken from original images at a range of ISO settings to show the overall image quality. These pictures were taken indoors using shaded natural light.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

This is the full frame at minimum ISO.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

Even at 80 ISO there is a lack of really fine detail, although the white dots are dust on the car model itself, rather than noise.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

100 ISO and there is some patchy mottling on the red areas.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

200 ISO shows more of the same.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

400 ISO and there is a sudden drop in colour fidelity, and the gradients look very patchy.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

800 ISO is very noisy, a disappointing result to say the least.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

At 1600 ISO the image quality is very poor.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

3200 ISO is available at 3MP, but the quality is web-cam standard.

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

6400 ISO at 3MP, but really, why?

----

Nikon CoolPix L110 test photo

This is the full frame at maximum ISO.

----

andy1m

April 16, 2010, 8:24 am

Thanks for the review. I have been looking for a mega-zoom camera. Panasonic FZ35 is my choice but it's not available in my place. I live in Indonesia Batam Island...





Nikon L110 is now available here with very a competitive price. But without many manual control is a minus point for me. And the image quality seems not that good...

Igor LEAHU

April 16, 2010, 3:28 pm

@andy1m: consider a Pentax X90 :)

ThatOne

April 16, 2010, 9:06 pm

Where did you find 9/10 for Value? 8/10 for Build Quality, 6/10 for Features and 7/10 for Image Quality, that lot together is no better than 7/10 on paper for the Value. But in reality, facing the competition at about the same price, this Nikon is worth very little indeed. (Purely personally, 7/10 for Image Quality at over £150 = avoid whatever the other scores may be.) Amazing from Nikon, a development program that has borne virtually nothing.

R L

April 26, 2015, 9:32 am

I have had the piece of $#!@ camera for about 5 years and I have had enough! I just returned from another vacation where I again was cheated out of a once-in-a-lifetime photo due to the batteries being exhausted. The damn camera has no rechargeable battery pack, has no battery meter, and no warning about battery condition until time to shoot the next photo and then it displays "battery exhausted" and you are finished. Even if you carry an extra supply of AA batteries, it takes too long to replace them "in the moment". The only alternative is to replace the batteries every damn time you go to use the camera--a rather expensive proposition. I even tried lithium batteries and they last a little longer, but it is still unpredictable how long. I am going to list it on EBay for the some sucker to be the highest bidder and get it out of my life once and for all. If anyone wants to buy this POS cheap, reply here.

comments powered by Disqus