Home » News » Monitor News » Samsung Unveils Widest Ever 23in Monitor » Comments

Comments for Samsung Unveils Widest Ever 23in Monitor

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Name withheld

darkspark88

12:17 AM on 11 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore darkspark88. Show Details Hide Details

I have to say, don't be too hasty about the sidebar disappearing in Windows 7. I like it, and there are plenty of others out there who don't want gadgets scattered all over their desktop where they can accidentally be clicked. However, there should be a better implementation than it's current state.

Score:

Name withheld

jopey

2:38 AM on 11 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore jopey. Show Details Hide Details

Meh.. I think 2132x1200 would be better. There's no sense in having both the horizontal and the vertical resolution un-remember-able numbers.

Score:

Name withheld

ilovethemonkeyhead

7:00 AM on 11 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore ilovethemonkeyhead. Show Details Hide Details

i have a performance meter side bar on my pc that always gets covered by anything full screen, and will always also get in the way of i overlay it. and it's my favourite gadget, also...

Score:

Name withheld

gurnaik

10:26 AM on 11 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore gurnaik. Show Details Hide Details

£192 for 2048 x 1152! I'll take two.

Score:

Name withheld

cjb110

10:28 AM on 11 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore cjb110. Show Details Hide Details

I thought the actual reasoning behind the res was to have two a4 vertical pages and still have space (for sidebar, or desktop icons or whatever)

Score:

Name withheld

Horace Coker

7:05 PM on 11 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Horace Coker. Show Details Hide Details

Why say 16:10 and not 8:5?

Score:

Name withheld

Joe

8:47 PM on 11 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Joe. Show Details Hide Details

@Horace: because it is easier to visualise 16:10 to 16:9 than 8:5 to 16:9.

Score:

Name withheld

Horace Coker

9:20 PM on 12 November, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Horace Coker. Show Details Hide Details

Joe: something in that!

Score:

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.