Home » News » Mobile Phone News » Palm Pre Follow-up Revealed » Comments

Comments for Palm Pre Follow-up Revealed

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Name withheld

Luan Bach

3:54 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Luan Bach. Show Details Hide Details

2.63in 320 x 480, that has got to be the densest screen on the market ?

Score:

Name withheld

Gnormie

4:15 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Gnormie. Show Details Hide Details

I doubt the render, all the letters on the keyboard and pointing directly at the user when the phone is offset.

Score:

Name withheld

Brian ONeill

4:17 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Brian ONeill. Show Details Hide Details

Looks nice, i have been looking a new qwerty phone for the wife. She never uses the camera or the music player. She uses it for email/web so this type of thing is perfect.

Score:

Name withheld

Ohmz

4:18 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Ohmz. Show Details Hide Details

The Blackberry Bolds' screen is more dense. 2.5 inches with the same resolution.

Score:

Name withheld

Gordon394

4:23 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Gordon394. Show Details Hide Details

@Ohmz - technically that makes it less dense!

@Gnormie - we'll see but I'm hearing multiple reports that it's on the money

Score:

Name withheld

Malderon

4:34 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Malderon. Show Details Hide Details

Ive been interested in the Pre (and now therefore this handset) for some time. Im an avid smartphone user and have had Windows Smartphone, Windows Mobile and Symbian in the past and now I have a BB storm. My worry with WebOS will be that it may attract Open source support - but will it attract big name support. Tomtom for satnav and the BBC for an iplayer app for example?

Score:

Name withheld

Ohmz

4:42 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Ohmz. Show Details Hide Details

@ Gordon, check again...

Score:

Name withheld

Gordon394

4:45 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Gordon394. Show Details Hide Details

@Ohmz - same pixel count on a physically smaller screen = higher pixel density.

Score:

Name withheld

Ohmz

4:47 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Ohmz. Show Details Hide Details

@ Gordon. That's what I said, look at my comment again in response to Luan Bach.

Score:

Name withheld

Williamn

5:04 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Williamn. Show Details Hide Details

whoops ;)

Score:

Name withheld

BinnsY

11:17 PM on 1 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore BinnsY. Show Details Hide Details

Think ohmz is right on this one Gordon, 320*480 on 2.5 inches is more dense than 320*480 on 2.63

This definately looks interesting though, I have been following the pre with some interest for quite a while and now this looks even better for my needs.

Score:

Name withheld

rav

9:20 AM on 2 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore rav. Show Details Hide Details

the touch diamond is more dense too i think. 2.8" and 640*480.

Score:

Name withheld

Gordon394

7:02 PM on 2 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Gordon394. Show Details Hide Details

@Ohmz - apologies, I misread your argument. Yes, as we were both arguing: same pixel count on a physically smaller screen = higher pixel density.

Score:

Name withheld

Helmore

9:51 PM on 3 May, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Helmore. Show Details Hide Details

What about a 3" screen with a resolution of 800x480?

The Toshiba G900: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=707&specs=toshiba_port%E9g%E9_g900

Still not a great phone from what I could gather. I've never seen one myself though.

Score:

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.