This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore AnthonyArmstrong.Show DetailsHide Details
So hot was the iPhone when Apple launched it last year that, in exchange for exclusive rights, network operators agreed not only to sell it at a high price, but to hand over a share of their user revenues as well. The normal tactic of mobile operators, however, is to subsidise the handset in order to attract high-spending customers. The iPhone may be flash, but it has struggled to compete with other handsets that are given away at no upfront cost.
That is a pity because mobile phone subsidies are inefficient. They prompt customers to change their handset every couple of years, when they come to the end of a contract, which has an economic cost. The constant churn in handsets also makes it harder to design new applications to run on them.
Perhaps Apple missed an opportunity: had it sold iPhones with no link to a network contract then the cycle of subsidy might have been broken. But that was always a long shot in a fiercely competitive market. The question now is which will bother the iPhone’s painfully cool users more: that they had to pay a fortune for the gadget, or that, with subsidies, the general public may start to buy them as well.
We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.
We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.
Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.
Comments