Atleast $300 more expensive than competition (e.g. Canon XSi), but with a better kit lens, high density LCD monitor, video, face detection, and live view with autofocus at last. A winning formula - BRAVO, Nokon.
Jimmy, I would say that Nikon's D90 compares best to Canon's 50D as illustrated here: http://a.img-dpreview.com/previews/NikonD90/images/preview/sidebyside1.jpg . It out-classes Canon's 450D (or XSi for some), that one would compare best to Nikon's (imo underwhelming) D60.
Don't be so elitist, Spider. Face it, in terms of quality there's little more these cameras can offer so they have to differentiate themselves with other features. I for one certainly welcome the ability to shoot video on an SLR - saves me carrying around two devices - I just wish they'd included stereo audio. Face detection is also quite useful if you just want to grab some quick shots. Versatility it the aim of the game.
I do think spider has a point to an extent, especially on the movie mode. I have a compact camera for snaps and videos. If I take out my SLR it's to use as a camera. I'd much rather every penny of the cost of the camera was spent on ensuring the camera takes the best still photos possible (I guess I'd agree that face detection does that).
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore CharlesStephens.Show DetailsHide Details
I agree with spider and purephase but if the camera lives up to expectations then when the prices drop a bit, as they surely will,then I,m having one! I,ll down grade my D80 to back up camera.
We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.
We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.
Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.
Comments