Home » News » PC Component News » Intel: 32nm Development Complete » Comments

Comments for Intel: 32nm Development Complete

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Name withheld

John McLean

11:07 AM on 11 December, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore John McLean. Show Details Hide Details

Excellent news. I always go for the "tick" CPUs over the "tock" ones - by the time the die-shrink for the tick comes along the architecture has generally been through a few steppings and optimisations, you avoid the early adopter price of buying into a new architecture, software has had a chance to be developed which takes advantage of optimisations in the architecture over previous architectures so you really get to see the benefits, and you should get power and heat savings due to the smaller process. Win-win-win-win-win

Score:

Name withheld

Amir

1:52 PM on 11 December, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Amir. Show Details Hide Details

smart choice.

nothing lasts in the present

Score:

Name withheld

Pbryanw

3:41 PM on 11 December, 2008

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Pbryanw. Show Details Hide Details

Well put Amir, and a very Buddhist philosophy (impermanence that is)

Anyway, it doesn't seem that long ago we were looking forward to 45nm processors (is 42nm a mistake?) so it seems that nothing waits for technology.

Score:

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.