Home » News » Mobile Phone News » Apple 'iPhone lite' & 'Media Pad' En Route? » Comments

Comments for Apple 'iPhone lite' & 'Media Pad' En Route?

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Name withheld

ChrisC

10:15 AM on 29 April, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore ChrisC. Show Details Hide Details

Maybe they'll rebrand the iPod Touch the 'media pad lite' at the same time?!

Score:

Name withheld

Cub

10:47 AM on 29 April, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Cub. Show Details Hide Details

AARRGHHH!

Trusted Reviews. You were my one oasis of peace and tranquillity away from this damn story. This wild speculation has garnered dozens of stories on every other site I visit; I truly believed that you wouldn't go here.

Please stop treading into this territory, Apple rumours have their place on the interweb and it isn't on a great, respectable, site like this.

Needless to say, I believe this hyperbole to have absolutely *no* basis in reality. I'm a big Apple fanboy, and I would love to see an iTablet; that is, a larger iTablet than what the iPod Touch already is, but it is not happening... Not yet at least...

As for the iPhone nano? Just... No. Answer me "Why?" Apple would do this. I'm still to read a good, valid reason.

Score:

Name withheld

Gordon394

12:31 PM on 29 April, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Gordon394. Show Details Hide Details

@Cub - sorry Cub, they have to be done once in a while if only to make sure readers get some sensible assessment of the talk going on out there.

PS - iPhone nano? Easy: budget iPhone (I believe I said this in the article)

PPS - Bear in mind Apple rumours tend to get pretty accurate these days as the announcement dates get closer

Score:

Name withheld

xbrumster

1:11 PM on 29 April, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore xbrumster. Show Details Hide Details

ipod touch can make voip calls over wifi once you have the jailbroken apps, it seems if the rumour even became true, apple was just making it official - I would see the network big 4 not very happy...

cheap iphone means more people can afford it thus increase user base & increase apple market share.. perfect economy solution. Bring it on! we like it cheap..

at the same time, I wouldn't mind a premium itablet, bringing touch netbook to the dying market, a new era... just like how iphone has changed the mobile market.

Score:

Name withheld

Cub

1:13 PM on 29 April, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Cub. Show Details Hide Details

@Gordon - I can appreciate that, at least you're staying sceptical on the matter :)

Budget iPhone? That's a reason why customers want it, I asked for a reason why Apple would do this; it’s not like they’re having trouble shifting the current model! A budget iPhone makes no sense to them, what would be cut back for this "nano"? A smaller device? That would ruin compatibility with all of the apps available. Cutting back on GPS/wi-fi/3g/camera? Again, would ruin compatibility with a lot of apps. One of the huge selling points of the app store is that no extra work is required from a developer to make an app work on any device running the iPhone OS. I understand that this may not always be the case as the hardware/OS evolves, but we're still early on in the iPhone's life.

The iPod was split into separate models because iTunes was the key sell – access to the largest library of digital music, TV shows, and movies, the easy syncing with any computer - the hardware that accessed it was, to a degree, irrelevant. With the iPhone, it’s the OS and the App Store that sell the device, any changes to the iPhone, outside of the aesthetical, would create multiple formats; screen sizes, resolutions, etc.

Had an argument in another, site that an iPhone nano could just cut off access to the App store! Apple may as well give the phone away for the potential profit they would lose"

Score:

Name withheld

lifethroughalens

1:46 PM on 29 April, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore lifethroughalens. Show Details Hide Details

How's work at the Cupertino Campus these days, Cub? ;)

Score:

Name withheld

Cub

2:59 PM on 29 April, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Cub. Show Details Hide Details

I wish I could tell you, my poor little UK city hasn't even got an Apple store yet :(

All I'm saying is exactly the kind of thing that the people who call themselves Analysts should be saying, instead of spouting out every excitable rumor that they dream of.

I'm not an analyst, I just have a logical head for business and keep my eyes on the market.

Score:

Name withheld

rav

6:22 PM on 29 April, 2009

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore rav. Show Details Hide Details

I would say that in the long term they need to lower the entry price to gain more customers but then the price of the cheapest (unibody) macbooks indicates that they really don't. i'm sure apple would be happy to keep selling a (relatively) small number of iphones to the well heeled at their current margins.

Score:

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.