Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Wikipedia may be building a search engine after all

Wikipedia has revealed details surrounding a $250,000 grant to explore the possibility of building a search engine.

The Register has obtained information from the Wikipedia Foundation, disclosing how the money from the Knight Foundation will be used.

The cash go towards completing stage one of the “Knowledge Engine,” which internal documents describe as “a system for discovering reliable and trustworthy information on the internet.”

Conceptual designs for the discovery platform leaked onto the internet this week (pictured).

According to the report, the initial stage will be to prototype future versions of the Wikipedia.org website to incorporate the engine, while also embedding it within devices.

According to Wikipedia’s own risk assessment, the biggest threat to such a service would be Google or Yahoo deciding to do likewise.

The news comes just a day after Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales describing the possibility of the foundation doing a Google as “a total lie.”

See also: George W. Bush has the most edited page on Wikipedia

He said: “To make this very clear: no-one in top positions has proposed or is is proposing that WMF should get into the area of general “searching” or to try to “be Google.””

(apester:56c1aab917a1f6c05099c625)

Would a Wikipedia search engine represent and trustworthy source of knowledge? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

Trusted Reviews Logo

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the best of Trusted Reviews delivered right to your inbox.

This is a test error message with some extra words