Apple has taken Swedish firm Ericsson to court over LTE wireless network patents.
According to Apple, Ericsson is demanding over-the-odds royalties for patents that aren’t essential to industry cellular standards, as reported by Reuters.
This has led Apple to claim it isn’t infringing Ericsson’s patents, claiming that it doesn’t actually owe any royalty payments.
Apparently, Apple says Ericsson wants a payout for the LTE tech valued as a percentage of an entire smartphone or tablet device.
Apple instead wants the company to base the royalties on the value of the processor that uses the technology.
The fruity firm is hoping one of two things happens. The best case scenario for Apple is that the courts deem Ericsson’s patents as non-essential, and waive any royalty demands targeted at Apple.
The next best thing would be that if the courts to decide Ericsson’s patents are essential, then they at least force the Swedish company to adopt a more appropriate royalty rate.
Related: Apple’s Beats faces Monster lawsuit over ‘sham’ sale
Apple spokesperson Kristin Huguet said: “
She continued: “Unfortunately, we have not been able to agree with Ericsson on a fair rate for their patents so, as a last resort, we are asking the courts for help.
Apple’s current patent-licensing agreement with Ericsson dates back to 2008, shortly after the first iPhone launch.
In other news regarding Apple’s legal team, the company has announced a new settlement agreement to resolve a class action lawsuit alongside Google, Intel, and Adobe over employee poaching.
Editorial independence
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
Professional conduct
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
Editorial independence
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
Professional conduct
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
