Home » News » Surround Sound System News » Philips Launches First Freeview HD Receiver & PVR

Philips Launches First Freeview HD Receiver & PVR

Gordon Kelly by

Philips Launches First Freeview HD Receiver & PVR

I'm sure you know the type: they own one, possibly two HDTVs and have possibly even upgraded sets all the while having never used them to watch anything in High Definition! Well, this is for them...

Philips has used its long running partnership with Pace to roll out its first Freview HD digiboxes today so viewers can ogle HD content on their televisions without any form of monthly contract.

Arriving in mid April will be the 'DTR5520' - a simple yet rather stylish receiver, which allows owners to receive all Freeview standard and High Def content. At present broadcasts are limited to 720p and 1080i (and bandwidth restrictions should mean that is the case for some time to come), but the box will happily upscale to 1080p, automatically setup all channels, provide parental control options and output to Dolby Digital 5.1. Energy efficiency is also excellent consuming less than 6w in use, under 1w in standby and just 0.3w when off - all well under industry guidelines. At just 290 x 37 x 160mm and 2.3Kg it is also no bulkier than your average laptop.

As for the 'HDT8520', this takes all the functionality of the DTR5520 and adds in PVR functionality to play, pause or rewind live TV. Its 500GB HDD will hold up to 250 hours of SD or 125 hours of HD content and dual tuners mean you can record one channel while watching another. Happily from my brief hands-on with the product, I can also report that is it virtually silent in operation - great news given noise is a common problem which affects many PVRs including Sky+HD. At 240 x 65 x 210mm it is understandably chunkier than the DTR5520, but it still looks the part and also matches its little brother's 1w standby power consumption while using 15w in operation which is again well under industry guidelines for a PVR.

Problems? I'd say two. The first is right now HD content on Freeview is extremely limited with just BBC HD and ITV1 HD, but Channel 4 HD will arrive over the next few months and - crucial to the sales pitch - having the first two will mean getting the World Cup in High Definition when it kicks off in June.

The second is price. With Freeview digiboxes available for under £50 the sweet spot for the DTR5520 would obviously be £99, but it comes in at much more hefty £149.99 while the DTR5520 is a frightening £299.99. Yes, both still work out considerably cheaper than signing a Sky HD contract over the course of a year, but then you are also comparing three mainstream High Definition channels in one service to over 40 in the other.

The DTR5520 will launch in April with the DTR5520 to follow in May and with numerous other Freeview HD boxes due on the market before June I'd expect a brutal price war over the coming months. So how is your resolve?



Go to comments


March 24, 2010, 6:23 pm

<p>&amp;pound;300 quid - Jes-... that's me waiting another while for Freeview HD then. (And I do want those PVR capabilities but that's too steep for me at least.)</p>


March 24, 2010, 6:26 pm

<p>@TR I'm looking forward to the review for this and the forthcoming boxes. Roll on the World Cup that's what I say.</p>


March 24, 2010, 6:27 pm

<p>All my kit is Panasonic so once they release a similar PVR product I shall be reaching for my credit card. Some HD content without a subscription/dish would suit me just fine.</p>

Mike B

March 24, 2010, 6:55 pm

<p>Until there is a HDD model under &amp;pound;200 I will keep credit card in my pocket! <br><br><br><br><br><br>Also needs to be able to record two channels at once, not record one and watch another.</p>


March 24, 2010, 8:01 pm

<p>As stated in the article, current bandwidth restrictions limit the HD content to 720p or 1080i whichever service you choose. As this will be inevitably overcome in future, will these current generation of decoders be compitable? Needing only a firmware update to provide new decoding algorithms or will we be at square one again? I'm not against such devices, as I'm eyeing the PVR solutions. It's just that we always need one more box to get the proper HD experience. I'll stick with my Blu-ray player otherwise..</p>


March 24, 2010, 8:06 pm

<p>Hi Gordon, you're right for the price of the settop box (a looker!) but the PVR seems not that bad a deal when compared to for example a Panasonic 500GB-HDD/DVD recorder with ONE FV SD tuner! But then we are talking 'First-Gen' boxes.<br><br><br><br><br><br>If anyone from the manufacturers is listening add two Freesat Tuners also and you have a WINNER.<br><br><br><br><br><br>gain, on my favourite topic, 40HD Channels on Sky: here's a sample of reader quotes from the TimesOnline - &amp;quot;Lots of old movies and mediocre ones in HD? No thanks.&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Sky HD is sadly utterly dire in quality. 720p is only technically HD, when the TV's and other equipment are doing 1080p though its utter tat. The compression that's used is awful, and very noticeable in the background where you get colour combining and bad compression corruption. Switch to the BBC HD channel and utterly perfect at a much lower compression level. Someone say Sky cost cutting on bandwidth?!&amp;quot;<br><br><br><br><br><br>Like I said - Please see <a href="http://www.trustedreviews.com/home-cinema/news/2010/03/19/Sky-3D-Launch-Date-Unveiled/comments" rel="nofollow">http://www.trustedreviews.com/...</a></p>

comments powered by Disqus