Vodafone & O2 Ink Mast Sharing Deal

@Gordon - I think your comment was @Crash Biker, not me.

Where there's duplication it's hard to imagine one set of equipment would simply win out over the other. The networks need the capacity, especially with the limited success of mobile broadband, and they'll understand that they can't simply remove antennae without plunging users into black spots who previously enjoyed good coverage.

It'll take several years but I think the result will be good. It's somewhat sad that this is happening now, though, rather than when 3G came about. Yet all that remains of the 3G rollout is the most expensive part, so perhaps the timing is perfect after all.

I do agree that there is not 100% mast duplication, but my suspicion if you look at the country as a whole is that there is 99% duplication (or pehaps overlay of coverage is a better way of looking at it.) I'd be foolish to think there was no possibility of improvement for anyone at the edge of the network, but equally I would be astonished to see a sudden expansion of base station equipment deployment. (I'm assuming just the masts are being shared - presumably the antenna and transmitters will remain provider specific? Network backhaul could be shared I suppose, any info?)

After a decade+ of rapid expansion the local market is now close to saturation and capacity is not a problem (in general), in fact all those 3G cells have been somewhat under-used. Coverage is no longer a key differentiator for the networks, price and handset offerings dominate and the networks are trying to increase (or maintain) average revenue per customer through extra services. This requires some expenditure on infrastructure centrally but not in the network. Investments will only be made in areas that will drive revenue and capacity and coverage is not an issue for this, everywhere else is subject to cost saving exercises which is where these agreements come in.

Again, not saying no-one will benefit, but on a national coverage/capacity plan this will be a reduction, not an expansion.

Incidentally, clicking through to the 13/3 story I note "It is fairly common consensus that the O2 and Vodafone networks have the best signal around the UK". I don't dispute the absolute truth of this at all, but my understanding of 3 is that it is a native 3G network + 2G roaming on O2, the best of both worlds, which I had always assumed gave the best coverage overall (I think it used to be 3 + Orange).

Ah well - I do hope I'm wrong and being unduly cynical and I'll be delighted if things turn out as Gordon/Ben describe. Cheers.

This is one huge piece of FUD.

"This is purposely not about radio equipment," Derek McManus of O2 told us, "As well as power supplies we'll be sharing air conditioning and making space in each other's cabinets - we've never done that before."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/24/vodafone_o2_fud/