Home / Computing / PC Component / nVidia GeForce GTX 285 / Power, Final Thoughts, and Verdict

nVidia GeForce GTX 285 - Power, Final Thoughts, and Verdict

By Edward Chester



Our Score:


Power Consumption

One of the key advantages of shrinking your product's manufacturing process is theoretically getting the same performance while using less power, and this is a fact that's been borne out with the GTX 285. The difference between this card and its predecessor isn't perhaps quite as dramatic as one might first hope but remember the GTX 285 is also clocked higher, which increases power consumption.

As compared with the competition from ATI, it's six of one and half a dozen of the other. The GTX 285 draws significantly less power than the HD 4870 when idling but then considerably more when under load. We'd be inclined to hand the victory to nVidia's latest, though, as that high load figure also accompanies a reasonably significant performance advantage as well.

Final Thoughts

As well as impressing us with its performance and power consumption, the GTX 285 has one final trick up its sleeve. It's cooler is surprisingly quiet, particularly when idling, and is markedly less intrusive all round than those employed by ATI's top cards.

However, things are less rosy when we come to look at value. There's simply no denying £300 odd (or closer to £350 for the overclocked card we've tested) is a lot to spend on a graphics card, especially given that you can get overclocked ATI HD 4870s for under £200. That said, the GTX 285 does at least occupy a unique territory. The ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 and nVidia GeForce GTX 295 are both way ahead in terms of performance but their dual-chip design can still be temperamental and they cost £400-£500, so by being the fastest single-chip graphics card and 'only' costing £300, the GTX 285 will appeal to many. Overall, though, we still feel it's a little overpriced, regardless of its unique position.


The nVidia GeForce GTX 285 is the fastest single-GPU graphics card on the market, which is impressive enough in itself. However, factor in its surprisingly quiet HSF and lower power consumption than its predecessor and we start to get very excited indeed. Unfortunately, its high price prevents the GTX 285 from getting an outright recommended award but it's definitely one to consider.

Overall Score


Scores In Detail

  • Performance 9
  • Value 6
  • Features 7


March 9, 2009, 9:45 pm

Thanks for the review. I'm thinking of changing my ancient old 7950GT. Do you have a baseline idle power consumption figure for your new system without the graphics card in it (ie using integrated graphics)? That would give us an idea how much power the card itself consumes on idle.

And for those of us that strive for a silent PC how quiet is quiet?

I'll happily pay more for something that doesn't guzzle power when I'm not playing a game and is very quiet (or preferably silent).

John 9

March 10, 2009, 12:48 pm

Can you tell me what psu is needed to use this gfx?


March 10, 2009, 1:05 pm

Well, you've got plenty of options. Anything rated at over about 500W should be fine. It'll need at least two six-pin PCI-Express connectors (most brands have them nowadays) but aside from that it just comes down to price and other features like modularity and flashing lights. OCZ, Enermax, FSP, Cooler Master, Thermaltake, Silver Power, Seasonic, etc. There's loads of good brands out there that will all do the business.

As it so happens, I'm doing a 500-700W power supply group test this week so keep an eye out for that in the next week or two if you want a definitive answer.


March 10, 2009, 6:21 pm


Unfortunately I don't have the card anymore so can't take it home and try it in a truly silent environment. It's certainly as quiet a fan cooler as I've heard when idling, though.

I'll pop a low power graphics card in our test bed later today and see what sort of figure I get. I'll then include that in future reviews.


July 29, 2009, 1:31 am

The price shown here is a bit high, i found it on overclockers for 230 Pounds, sorry to bother, i do know that this review was written on 9th March, but as i was searching for reviews about this graphics card, i could not go by, and let other people see the prices here which might cause them not to buy this link without further searching.

comments powered by Disqus