Roberts Stream WM-202 Comments

This is a very disappointing review. I have had this radio for about 2 months and ,while it's not perfect, I find it excellent. When people buy a radio they are probably most interested in sound qualities. The reviewer devotes a meagre few lines to this vital aspect where the WM-202 is truly excellent. On the other hand he writes at length on design which is in many respects a matter of personal taste and preference. I read Trusted Reviews regularly - and value it - but this review is not up to its usual high standards.

Much of this review is undoubtedly correct - indeed I can add further criticisms like the back light that is so bright ( and non adjustable) that you can read by it or the truly terrible battery useage. It retains a unique selling point however - it is truly portable -and that became my crucial buying factor. The software/ internal chip is evidently shared by several vendors and could be significantly improved but the sound and flexibility overall is,I would contend, the best of an indifferent crop.

"Also, I must once again mention the odd control layout...illogically laid out...criss-cross of buttons rather than a simple row?"
I sometimes wonder what is the logic reviewers think ought to inform the control layout. My bedside radio is a design mess visually, with all mismatched buttons and switches scattered about. But very easy for my fingers to read the controls when my eyes are asleep. Contrast with the more usual Sonyesque designs, a military grid of identical buttons, flush mounted (or worse still, touch sensitive). Looks great in a minimalist sort of way but much harder to operate, alseep or awake.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think the radio looks stunning.Most people wnat to know what an audio device sounds like and thankfully there are plenty of other review sites that devote their articles to how it performs rather than now their particular reviewer likes the look of it.

And lo and behold - its actually rather good.

On this occasion Trustworthy review not trustworthy. I had this radio with so many others. It is my hobby to buy play and collect radios. I love radios. I mainly concern with - quality of sound, reliability and ease of use and this seems to fit all of them. There is only one criticism and that is the light is too bright otherwise it is a perfect radio. You got everything in it. Worth having it and the helpline is brilliant.

I bought this radio for a number of reasons:
First: Bands namely first WiFi, then DAB (I live in a country with some reasonably good DAB services available, but not DAB sets, just half a dozen overpriced mainly Pure sets) and only subsidiarily FM (enough sets for that).
Second: Possibility of battery operation.
My opinion after using the set (bought in the UK) for a few days.
Very pleased with WiFi, DAB and sound quality.
Not impressed by setting up process and ease for the selection of internet stations. Regret the lack of a remote mainly for selecting bands and presets, and volume control. Battery use seems very limited using the set mainly on mains and only occasionally on batteries, probably also due to the large display remaining lit all the time even when operated from batteries.
I found the price very reasonable given the characteristics (WiFi radio, DAB, streaming) in the absence of an alternative with the same characteristics I would buy it again

I've had this radio for a couple of weeks. I've had some other DAB radios but nothing quite like this. I was keen on internet streaming radio and media server but 60% of the time I will be using the DAB radio.

Overall I'm reasonably impressed.

Good points:
* Easy navigation also sometime confusing
* DAB tuner good (with aerial extended)
* Quick DAB tuning (compared with TEAC mini hi-fi
* Big batteries - although I only use it for a portion of the time on these - at least I won't be changing them every 5 minutes.

Bad points:
* Power management - plugging in power cord can crash the radio requiring removal of battery (1 in 20 times perhaps)
* Backlit display is on all the time when on mains power, requiring covering up during the night - if you like the dark that is!
* Display is slow so that reading scrolling text is difficult to read
* Poor use is made display real estate - especially for the media server where artist/track/duration info could be displayed at the same time.
* Why two speakers? No chance of any stereo imaging with the speakers so close together, a single, bigger speaker would provide a better, more bass rich sound. The sound is not as good as my 10 year old, smaller, Panasonic radio.
* Not enough presets - although the button layout isn't a problem for me.

Given the price of a decent DAB radio, the premium on the additional features doesn't seem that much so overall 8/10.

This radio looks much nicer than the majority of DAB radios available out there, many of which look as though their designers were lost in the woods when trying to visualize what the punters expect a modern radio to look like.
Let us remember this isn't just another DAB radio. I will not be using it in DAB mode. I bought this radio in order to enjoy the massive range of music available on the internet, rather than the homogenous stream of mediocre dross available on DAB (the wonderful bbc excepted). I did not expect such an intuitive user interface or such good sound quality and find it hard to associate the above review with this excellent radio. I think the above reviewer should stick to writing reviews of Gillette razers with multi blades and formula 1 shaped handles, because he obviously doesn't get what radios are for.
My rating 9/10

Thanks for the review Ed.

I'm English and live in Denmark. I bought this radio albeit with a different brand name of Lumatron, marketed

as such for the Scandinavina market I can only assume. Other than that it is exactly the same piece of kit.

It cost me the princely sum of 800 Danish Kroner which equates to around £80, a bargain in my humble opinion.

I am chuffed to bits with the unit. The build quality good, it feels solid and robust. It is asthetically

pleasing in black, in fact it looks great compared to the silver Roberts unit. Here is a Danish link:

http://www.nordjyske.dk/digitalt/mobil-og-gadgets.aspx?ctrl=10&data=170%2C3053659%2C5%2C3 Use google translate

to translate the web page.

The radio fulfills all my needs as the only reasons for me buying the unit was the internet radio capability

and portability i.e. battery power. The music player, DAB and FM capability are an added bonus for me.

Out of the box set up was a doddle. It found my wifi connection no problem. I have been using the favourites

function by registering online and adding my stations that way, and it works like a dream.

Pros:
Portability
Configuration a piece of cake
Good build quality
Sound quality good
Easy navigation
Looks (yes looks!)
Music player/streamer easy to use

This is the first wifi radio I have owned and so cannot compare to other models. The only gripe I have is maybe that the backlight is lit constant when plugged into the mains, but I will only be using batteries so it is not an issue for me as the light switches off after about 20 seconds whilst running on DC batteries.

A bargain at £80 if it can be found in blighty for that price. I thoroughly recommend this product.

9/10.

I was given a Roberts Stream 202 radio as a birthday present and was very excited being an avid radio listener. However, I was quickly disappointed when I found out the radio doesn't have a pause or rewind function for listening to Wifi and DAB radio and for podcasts. This is one of the main advantages of digital radios, particularly if you have a baby who decides to cry while I'm listening to a podcast or WiFi or DAB radio. I asked Roberts if a software update would be available to remedy this but was told it would be considered for future radio designers, ie no. Very strange as most Roberts DAB radios have a pause function already. Also what is the point of the software update function?

I agree with previous reviews that the controls are overly complicated and the layout is fairly naff. Most of the buttons could be done away with as there is a digital screen so all that is needed is a menu up and down button and an 'enter' button.

Good points - The sound quality is very good. The preset 'My Favourites' function is very good and easy to use, stations are preloaded on a website along with favourite podcasts.

Bad points - No pause or rewind function on Wifi, DAB or podcasts. Poor layout of complicated controls. It takes a long time to start up on Wifi though this is probably true of most Wifi radios. It's expensive compared to some other brands.

My rating is 6/10 due to the controls and no pause / rewind function. I wouldn't recommend the radio considering these bad points. The radio is good if you want a good quality realtime radio or want to listen to music on your computer through the radio.

If Roberts had thought abit more about the design and functions it would simply be the best radio ever. Shame!

I think the initial review and subsequent debate regarding the WM 202 got a bit overheated. I already owned a Sangean and have just acquired a WM 202 because I needed a portable and, despite the fact that DAB reception is not available in Florida, I am very, very happy with it (BTW the power supply can handle US voltages - you just need a plug adaptor). It took me all of 2 mins to connect to my WPA WiFi network without reading anything (not recommended!). I am not an audiophile, but the sound quality is way good enough for me and I like having two speakers - so there!

Let’s admit that Internet Radio is a relatively new technology, with limited options for the chip set, and face up to the fact that ALL the user interfaces are fairly primitive. Across the whole product range there are glaringly obvious HUGE improvements in general design and user interfaces. In addition the limited number of presets (as small as 5 per mode for the WM 202) is ridiculous considering the minimal extra programming etc. involved - just plain lazy! Shame on them! Most of the Internet radios I looked at seemed like they had been designed by an alien with tentacles who had never seen an Earth radio, or cobbled together out of old lawnmowers.

True the layout of the WM 202 push buttons is weird. Personally, I prefer lines of military style push buttons - going back to my trusty Sony ICF-2001 short wave receiver (standard issue for KGB agents in the Cold War and probably the best portable ever made) but hey, everything on the WM 202 works fine and styling is a very individual matter of taste - I quite like the spacey layout (sorry!). Volume and frequency tuning should always be a rotary as far as I am concerned, so a small minus for the +/- buttons volume control.

I haven’t got a Pure Evoke Flow, but I have read the reviews and specs. On balance I agree with the reviewer, I think it is a slightly better buy than the WM 202. But the style for PEF is clunky, not spacey like the WM 202. The PEF is black and simple - well that’s perfectly fine if it’s what makes you happy.

What I do NOT like about the WM 202 is: [1] If I push the presets in quick succession (so I can remind myself what I set them to) the system crashes and goes through a reboot (stack overflow?); [2] The backlight should have a separate ON/OFF dimmer control - it always stays on unless you are turned off and running on battery (a bummer at night); [3] You can pull OUT the power supply and it will keep running on battery, but if you plug it back IN again the system will do a complete restart - not cool Roberts; [4] (This applies to virtually all of them.) Why, oh why, do they always put the earphone socket at the back? Just a few seconds thought suggests this is bad idea. When I put the light out at night I have to put my earphone in (I won’t go into details :) ) - so I do it EVERY night, and pull it out the next morning when the coast is clear! Fiddling around at the back, when you are about to phase out into null space and are often not cognitively fully functional is extremely aggravating.

Still, all that being said, I really like my WM 202 and have no regrets. At present the cognoscenti choice in WiFi portable radios seems to be between these two, and in my personal opinion the decision is relatively marginal - except maybe if you have super-strong feelings about the relative look and feel - as the original reviewer obviously had. As far as I can see, either way you won’t go too far wrong.

Hint to manufacturers: One huge improvement would be to add a “Record (and Playback)” function onto a high capacity removable SD card. Now THAT would be an incredibly useful feature for either of the WM 202 or PEF! As far as I know only the Morphy Richards Internet Radio purports to have that function (at least one review suggests it plain doesn’t work) although it generally got really rotten reviews - which perhaps is not surprising - after all it is way down market! However, it seems a bit illogical that top of the range portables don’t have it, but the bottom of the range has at least made an effort?

I love my WM-202, although not as stylish as the 50's looking radios it's functions outweigh the looks.
When looking to buy this I had certain objectives in mind:
DAB
Stereo Speakers
Some way of playing mp3's

In the store I went to this was the only one that matched all three of these simple specifications.
When I got it home and tried the Wifi features I soon forgot about the way it looked, some people have complained it's not easy to use but as a self confessed technophile I think the controls are perfectly fine. I even got my technophobe girlfriend using the streaming features to blast out the likes of Kylie Mynogue and she is over the moon with this feature.
The only thing I think lacking from this device is a pause/rewind radio feature.
The only fault I've seen from it was when the Wifi signal was low and I was listening to internet radio it seemed to reset itself, a slight repositioning of my wireless hub resolved this.

All in all when compared to the 50's styled units this has much better sound and added features.