Western Digital WD TV Mini Launches
| Author | Hugo Jobling |
| Published | 19th Aug 2009 |
There's a new WD TV on the scene, but not the rumoured/leaked successor you might have been hoping for. Rather, the WD TV Mini is a downsized, slightly less feature-rich but cheaper alternative to its predecessor.
The main sacrifice is the lack of 1080p video output, with the mini limited to 1080i. Format support is lessened versus the WD TV. The Mini bests the WD TV by playing RealVideo, but it won't work with MKV files and h.264 and AVC are a no-go, too. Subtitle display is featured, at least. Audio is better taken care of, with all the common offenders catered for, namely MP3, WAV, WMA, AAC, FLAC and OGG. JPEG, GIF, TIFF, BMP and PNG images can be displayed.
Some criticism is probably deserved for the lack of an HDMI output, but if you really need that, the fully fledged WD TV is probably more up your street and if you don't, composite and Component should be perfectly fine. A digital optical output is featured, enabling multi-channel sound to be passed to an AV receiver - the unit itself will only cope with stereo.
The US MSRP is $99, so UK pricing should hopefully hit £60. We're still waiting for confirmation the WD TV Mini will launch here, though.
Link:
Western Digital.
Related Articles
Latest 4 of 11 Comments
Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.
HDRE said on 19th August 2009
drdark said on 19th August 2009
Original model is now £64.35 at Amazon. Quick, before they sell out!
jopey said on 19th August 2009
@drdark There are offbrand DVD players for around that price which do 1080p, have a usb port and do divx. A friend of mine got a Sumvision something which did all that. Does anyone... more
Luan Bach said on 19th August 2009
@jopey The MPAA is about to sue RealNetworks out of existence too.
See all 11 comments on this article.
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


11 comments
Email
TrustedReviews Newsletters
@WD Are you mad or just misguided? I can't decide.
I doubt it would have cost any more to leave the compatability with MKV files and h.264 alone (if the same chipset... more