High-End Headphone Round-up Comments
| Author | Stuart Andrews |
| Published | 10th May 2009 |
Comments for High-End Headphone Round-up
Nikola Runev said on 10th May 2009
Ahlan said on 10th May 2009
Can anybody please tell me what is the best surround Headphone for the PS3?
stranded said on 10th May 2009
I can't believe it, an AKG product review in this site!!
ilovethemonkeyhead said on 10th May 2009
will there be an even higher end review?
mike said on 10th May 2009
There's 2 Sennheiser HD595 versions, the newer ones are 50 Ohms (which I have). From amazon Ive heard the new ones sound as good as the older 120 Ohm units.
StuAndrews said on 11th May 2009
It's a mea culpa from me on this one. I got the 150Ohms figure from an old spec-sheet, and - looking at the box - I did actually have the 50 Ohm version to review. This would explain why they were much easier to drive than I expected. As I said, they'll benefit from amplification but they don't necessarily require it, which I understand is a step up from the 150 Ohm version. All the other comments made in the review still stand. While not the number one best set of cans I tested on any one genre of music, they're great all-rounders, and I think the lower impedance only makes them that bit more versatile. They're just about small enough and light enough for portable use, though sound leakage (in both directions) will be a problem.
@ilovethemonkeyhead: If you guys want one and the in-house team is happy for me to do one, I'd be happy to do an even higher end review. The problem is that I actually find the process quite addictive; all those headphones, all that music, it's difficult to know when to stop ;)
@Ahlan: I've been using a set of Sharkoon 5.1 'phones for a year or so now, but I don't find them 100% convincing. We've covered a few pairs of surround headphones for PC use, but not so many that you can use with a stereo or 5.1 output from a console. There are a few new sets coming through at the moment, though, so I'll see if we can take a look.
Stu.
comedian said on 11th May 2009
It would be great if you could do a proper high end round up as I have a pair of SR125s that I would like to upgrade, primarily because the sound stage is nonexistent and was looking at some of the Senn HD600/HD650s etc.
That was a really interesting read, keep up the good work.
Ahlan said on 11th May 2009
@StuAndrews: ok stu, ill wait for the new set, thanks :D
Lord Comben III said on 11th May 2009
I've got a pair of the Senn HD650's and they are fantastic. Only paid £180 on play.com as well so great investment.
comedian said on 11th May 2009
Yeah the HD650's seem to have come down quite a lot since the HD800 was released, £180 is a fantastic price though.
Lord Comben III said on 11th May 2009
Yeah now I want the HD800 :) This was about 2 years ago though so i think i was just really lucky
Vij said on 12th May 2009
Nice overview, although I wish more models were included. Headphones are like jewellery pieces - you won't find "the best one" only one that suits you best... So unlike with graphics or CPUs you actually need wide choice.
I am glad beyerdynamics were (finally) noticed and appreciated even if only for closed 770s (while open 990s would fit so much better in the comparison).
Shaun @ HiFi Headphones) said on 12th May 2009
I agree, it's great to see Beyerdynamic headphones given some recognition.
Compared with some other more consumer focused brands Beyerdynamic headphone are VERY well built and are obviously designed for everyday use.
I also agree that the Beyerdynamic DT880 and DT990 are both excellent headphones. I regularly recommend them to customers. The semi open designs are a good compromise between sound isolation and open character of sound. It's a shame these models exceeded the £150 limit for this feature.
Keith said on 14th May 2009
@comedian It would be great if you could do a proper high end round up as I have a pair of SR125s that I would like to upgrade, primarily because the sound stage is nonexistent.
Comedian, what are you powering your 125's with?, the soundstage on the 125 can be opened up much more depending on what your driving them with, eg. Most MP3 players will have pretty poor DAC's, but stick a set of 125's into a Denon or a PC with a high end Audio card and you will be amazed at what these will do :), because the fidelity on these things are very high the nuances that high end DAC's produce get passed on in there full glory creating a very good soundstage. The only thing that would worry me about getting headphones with some sort of built in soundstage is that it's kind of done some pre-processing for you, and I prefare to control that. But if your main use is for MP3 players then these might not be the best. I noticed in the review the editor never used anything with a decent DAC, I'm not sure onboard DAC's are that great, so no wonder he noticed a closed soundstage, if Stuart had connected them to say an SB X-Fi he would have noticed a massive difference.
StuAndrews said on 8th June 2009
@Keith
I'm probably a bit late to be replying on this one, but I did actually test using the outboard DAC on the iBasso D2 and the X-Fi I have sitting in my PC here. I certainly wouldn't suggest that the soundstage on the SR125s was nonexistent, but it's not as wide or open as you'd get from the Sennheiser or AKG 'phones. I love the sound of the SR125s, but all these cans have their individual strengths and weaknesses. That's partly what I love about them.
simon jackson said on 5th August 2009
I think i might be alone in liking "clinical" rock and pop :D I enjoy my music to be as faithfully rendered as possible, with as much detail as possible, and a wide soundstage with clear seperation between instruments. This applies to rock and pop as much to jazz/classical as far as i'm concerned. I just bought a pair of akg k701s and am extremely impressed. I highly recommend them. Incredibly detailed across the frequency range. Powerful, thuddy, but tight bass. Some would call them neutral, but as far as i'm concerned that's a good thing. If i want to a colour the sound, i can do that through eq. I'd rather nothing in my audio chain was hard wired to do it a particular way. High z/low sens does mean they wont go loud enough through your average dap though. I use a home built cmoy and that does the job nicely however.
One final comment i would make: such neutral, faithful cans seem to expose (at least to my ears) how much modern records are mastered to push the trebble. I imagine that's because many cheaper, integrated "mini" systems and car stereos have massively over driven bass, both in the amp and speaker stage, and so they need to crank the trebble in mixing to compete. I sometimes turn the trebble down on my desktop amp through the akgs as it can get uncomfortably bright at high volume.
Add Your Comment
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


the Sennheiser HD595's seem to be rated at 50Ωs http://www.sennheiser.co.uk/uk/home_en.nsf/root/private_headphones_audiophile-headphones_005343?Open&row=3