Refine search for MP3

SanDisk Sansa Fuze

Author Jonathan Bray
Published 22nd Jun 2008
Manufacturer SanDisk
Supplier Play
Price £55 to £90 (2GB to 8GB)
Latest Price
Features Score 9 for Features
Sound Quality Score 6 for Sound Quality
Value Score 7 for Value
Video Quality Score 5 for Video Quality
Overall Score 7 for Overall
SanDisk Sansa Fuze
Discuss this article  6 comments    Email this to a friend  Email this to a friend TrustedReviews NewslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

SanDisk's MP3 players have long been the popular alternative to Apple's all-conquering iPod players. Over the years they've managed to couple great value with decent usability and pretty slick design too. And Sansa players such as the venerable e-series and the more recent View have always crammed the features in.

Surprisingly, though, it has taken SanDisk nearly a year to respond to Apple's 'new' squat nano. We had the View months ago and the brilliant Clip, but neither took on the anodised iPod head on. The View was simply too big to rival its pocketability and the Clip too cheap and chirpy. Now that the Fuze is finally here, however, SanDisk at last has a direct competitor to Apple's most popular player.


If imitation really is the sincerest form of flattery, then the nano can feel itself well and truly idolised. The Fuze is almost identical in proportion to the nano, complete with short/fat profile. A landscape 1.9in screen sits above a circular control cluster, with even the sync and headphone connections in the same place, ranged along the bottom edge. The Fuze is slightly narrower, width-wise than the nano and a little taller too. It isn't as slim as the Nano, though, at 7.3mm compared to 6.5mm and it still can't quite match the Apple player's sense of style.


The Fuze is still a very nicely designed player, though, with a soft-touch rubberised rear and glossy front (available in more colours than just black, for the style conscious). Arguably the rubbery finish and slightly thicker profile makes it more comfortable to operate one handed, too. It isn't quite as soap-bar slippery as the nano.


Capacities go up to 8GB - the same as the nano - and even battery life is the same, quoted at 24 hours for music and five hours for video, but from here on the two players begin to diverge. The 1.9in screen, for instance, has a much lower resolution (220 x 176 pixels) than the QVGA (320 x 240 pixels) one found on the nano. And, apart from the fact that the quality isn't as good - colours aren't quite as natural and it's much more prone to reflections than the nano's screen - it doesn't support smooth 30fps video, forcing you to convert clips to a lowly, and much less watchable, 15fps.

Format support is limited to MPEG-4 files at native screen resolution too - a far cry from the excellent video support of the View, which supports WMV and MPEG-4 files at more than the native resolution of the screen (640 x 320). However, SanDisk does provide a free video converter tool for download from its website, which works very well and is easy to use.

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 4 of 6 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

Comment olee said on 22nd June 2008

Can you copy files to the Sansa Fuze just with Windows Explorer copy or with Total Commander, without any third party app or synchronization? Like those cheap no-name mp3 players.

Comment DaHarder said on 23rd June 2008

GoldenGuy...

It's not anything personal, It just appears that Mr Bray's reviews often make rather glaringly false statements in many of his reviews.
... more

Comment Jay said on 23rd June 2008

Hi DaHarder and thanks for your comments. We take pride in being accurate in our reviews but inevitably, as with every publication - online or in print - mistakes do creep in, espe... more

Comment parminder bhatti said on 23rd June 2008

I have noticed for some time now that some of trusted reviews are just poor and I have to say that this with its innacuracies is one of them. Another was one where you referred to ... more

See all 6 comments on this article.

Add Comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.