Home / Mobile / Mobile Phone / Moto G4 Plus

Moto G4 Plus review

evan kypreos




  • Editors choice

1 of 25

Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus hands-on
  • Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus hands-on
  • motog4plus 1
  • Moto G4 Plus 15
  • Moto G4 Plus 1
  • Moto G4 Plus 5
  • Moto G4 Plus 7
  • Moto G4 Plus 9
  • Moto G4 Plus 11
  • Moto G4 Plus 13
  • g4
  • pics2 5
  • pics2 7
  • pics2 9
  • pii
  • motog4plus 5
  • motog4plus 7
  • motog4plus 9
  • gaming
  • Moto G4 Plus Battery Life
  • Moto G4 vs G4 Plus camera comparison
  • Moto G4 vs G4 Plus camera comparison
  • Moto G4 vs G3
  • Moto G4 and Moto G4 Plus hands-on
  • Moto G4 Plus Camera
  • Moto G4 Plus battery life graph


Our Score:



  • Incredible value
  • Good camera
  • Speedy fingerprint scanner
  • Stock Android
  • Lovely screen for the price


  • A little unwieldy
  • Processor is getting on a bit

Key Features

  • 1080p, 5.5-inch display
  • Snapdragon 617 CPU
  • 2/3GB RAM
  • Android 6.0.1
  • 3,000mAh battery
  • 16MP camera
  • 5MP selfie camera
  • Manufacturer: Motorola
  • Review Price: £199.00

What is the Moto G4 Plus?

The Motorola Moto G is the standard by which every budget smartphone is measured. Since the first version was released back in 2013 the Moto G has dominated the TrustedReviews Awards Budget Phone of the Year category. You can’t get better bang for your buck anywhere.

Up until now we’ve only had one version of the G released every year, but Lenovo, who bought Motorola last year, has this time brought us two: the Moto G4 and the Moto G4 Plus.

You might expect the G4 Plus to be larger than the regular Moto G4 – it'd make sense with a name like that, wouldn't it? But you’d be wrong. The Moto G4 Plus is exactly the same size as the G4 and comes with the same whopper of a 5.5-inch screen.

Watch: Moto G4 and G4 Plus review

So what is the difference?

Well there's the price for starters. The Moto G4 Plus costs £199 for the basic 2GB RAM/16GB storage option. That’s £30 more than the equivalent Moto G4. The extra cash has been spent wisely, though – you get a fast, responsive fingerprint scanner and a better camera.

Is it worth it? Having used both phones for a while now I’d say yes, very much so. This is the best Moto G you can get right now.

Related: Moto G4 review

Moto G4 Plus – Design

The Moto G4 Plus is no style icon. It looks pretty similar to the myriad budget smartphones out there – glass slab front, plastic back.

At first glance I was underwhelmed, but I’ve come to appreciate the understated looks of the G4 Plus.

For starters the dark grey metal frame makes this feel like a phone that’s worth more and gives the G4 Plus a stability and robustness that’s rare in phones costing less than £300. I’ll attest to its durability, as I’ve dropped it twice – the second time on a hardwood floor – and it remains unscathed.

Moto G4 Plus 15

The soft-touch finish on the rear is reasonably grippy, but does get greasy quite easily. Pop the back off and there’s access to a microSD and Micro SIM tray – a Nano SIM adapter is included. The battery isn’t removable, however. Well, not without removing screws and voiding your warranty.

There are only two visible differences between the G4 Plus and G4. The first is a tiny extra sensor in the camera module for laser autofocus and the second is a small square at the bottom of the screen.

The latter is the fingerprint sensor and it’s rather good, if a little ugly. It’s nice and responsive and unlocks the phone as quickly as the Touch ID sensor does on the vastly more expensive iPhone 6S. Unfortunately, unlike with Apple’s phone, the fingerprint sensor on the Moto G4 Plus isn’t a button, so it doesn’t do anything other than unlock your phone. It feels like a wasted opportunity to add a nifty shortcut.

Moto G4 Plus 13

The biggest issue with the Moto G4 Plus is, well, how big it is. Even though it’s not as massive as the Nexus 6P, its 5.5-inch screen puts it distinctly into phablet territory and that means it'll be more than a handful for a lot of people.

If you’ve not bought into the benefits of large phones, and prefer to have a petite device in your pocket or handbag, you might need to look elsewhere – the Moto G4 Plus is almost the same size as the giant iPhone 6S Plus. It’s a real shame Lenovo hasn't given us the option of a smaller Moto G.

Still, if you can handle it there are a lot of benefits to having a larger phone, not least of which is the screen.

Moto G4 Plus – Screen

Every Moto G phone has had a good screen for its price, and the G4 Plus is no exception. In fact, its screen is fantastic and better than ones on some phones that cost a lot more.

For starters the resolution has been upped to Full HD, so it’s now pin-sharp. There are phones with higher resolutions out there, but I defy most people to notice the difference if the screen isn’t a few inches from your eyes. If you enjoy a bit of mobile VR, you might want a sharper panel, but for everyone else it’ll be absolutely fine.

The display technology used is still IPS. That means you don’t quite get the same black levels as with AMOLED phones like the Samsung Galaxy S7, but it’s very bright and colourful.

Colours are punchy, blacks decent and it has enough brightness to be viewed outdoors on even sunny days.

motog4plus 1

It really is a joy to use and makes the Moto G4 feel luxurious and like a much pricier phone than it is.

The only negative when it comes to image quality is that the colours aren’t perfectly accurate. The Simpsons' yellow skin has a faint greenish tinge to it and reds can be a bit too oversaturated, but this is still a far superior screen to any Moto G before it.

The screen is very fast and responsive to touch, although palm rejection isn’t perfect. I regularly find myself zooming in when trying to hit a link on a webpage because the bottom of my thumb interacts with the screen when I’m stretching.

One of the best features of the Moto G4 Plus is its Android software. I'll take a closer look at it on the next page.


May 17, 2016, 5:21 pm

There may be a place for bijou shiny metal phones, but it is wrong to assume that is the benchmark in all cases. A workaday mobile which lives crammed in a handbag along with pens, keys and random loose change needs a robust outer skin that shrugs off such daily wear without looking sorry and bedraggled. Why can't reviewers get that, that not everyone wants their phone to be a beautiful precious object? A phone that demands a case could be considered a failure of design to meet its purpose.

Muthaiga Institute of Awesome

July 3, 2016, 10:27 pm

Motorola makes superb phones

Hugo Weaving

July 6, 2016, 5:09 pm

Great Camera, great display, great battery, and cheap... amazing phone.


August 30, 2016, 9:19 am

Great phone, shame they omitted an NFC chip. Which in my opinion would not add much cost to the phone. Then it would have been perfect.

snake42591 .

September 1, 2016, 11:57 pm

So you're saying that metal phones arent very durable. You're wrong. They're just as if not more durable than plastic phones. Who ever said you have to have a case on a metal phone?

BTW what reviewers get is that for 600 dollars the phone better be designed beautifully or else people wont buy it. People buy more for the name and looks of a device than anything else. That is a fact.


September 2, 2016, 3:43 pm

Well I'm glad you've set the record straight there. One small thing - we are not talking about a 600 dollar phone here.


October 15, 2016, 2:47 pm

A metal case also compromises antenna design too much, that's why my wife often connects her iphone to the internet using the wi-fi hotspot in my MotoX - she's got no signal as soon as we're out of town.

Generating wi-fi, cellular, bluetooth and NFC signals inside a metal box is far from optimal.

Richard Lloyd

December 2, 2016, 12:30 pm

I'd like to see this phone compared to the Blu Vivo 6 (which is what the Vivo's sales guide on the Blu site does in fact!) - I just bought the latter for 184.99 on Black Friday and it has mostly better specs (only the Moto's rear camera beats it) at a lower price. If this Moto gets 10 out of 10, then the Vivo 6 should get 11 out of 10 :-)


December 6, 2016, 5:54 pm

You'd have to be nuts to use either Apple or Android pay. If you have it, deactivate it immediately it's not secure and in time you will see it broken.


December 17, 2016, 9:21 am

What's the word on reliability? A colleague has the regular version and suffers the screen jitter problem. Also the USB connector has pushed up inside its hole, making charging problematic. All this within 6 months. The phone is in a flip case with generous margins to protect all round.

Dean Waller

December 30, 2016, 10:50 pm

Well,my very expensive s7 kept freezing,and I mean freezing...Wouldn't even shut down,I had to run the battery out twice to reboot it...My g4 plus has never ever let me down,not even once...Guess which one I sold and which one I kept?

Lonesome Twin

January 5, 2017, 7:55 pm

Had mine for 3 months now. Got it right off Moto site c/w 2Gb/32Gb. Superb phone. Display is as clear as I could ever want and reliability is 100%. It connects happily to wifi that my pc can't even see, and both 3 & 4G are hang-free. Never frozen, nothing opens slowly, ton of apps work in perfect harmony although I don't do gaming so hardly an exhaustive usage.

Camera is great once you get the hang of it but stabilization would be appreciated. Moto's online site is worth less than a politicians promise, so RTFM-ing isn't even possible. The 'flash' is poor and a little yellow. I disagree with the reviewers comments about inaccurate colors. They look nigh-on perfect to me and flesh is especially naturalistic (Simpsons notwithstanding!), so perhaps some model variations then.

It goes pretty loud but line-out audio quality is frankly poor which is a pity. Bluetoothing speakers gets a little broken, not sure if that's par for the course as not used this feature before. I've never liked Bluetooth, this hasn't helped.

I've found the fingerprint sensor invaluable, apart from simply keeping the phone entirely to yourself it also goes straight into my bank account with no further logging. Lovely. I miss the NFC chip but I suppose something had to give.

As the review says though the main drawback is its physical size. It just about fits in my normal male paws but the back is smooth plastic and it really does get too slippery to use without a case, which of course adds dimensions.

Overall I'd recommend this phone to anyone most especially iPhone addicts who simply have too much money.

Farzad Zahedi

January 8, 2017, 3:21 am

No comparison, g4 plus is far better for the price, check every review from around the globe... Vivo is maybe 7/10.. edit, maybe 8/10.


January 25, 2017, 9:21 am

Thanks Lonesome Twin for your comment on audio quality of Moto 4G Plus. Except for its size this phone ticked all the boxes for me until I read this comment, but now it's a no-go. So what do I choose now instead of the 4G Plus?

I absolutely agree, it's a great pity that poor audio quality should negate the potential benefits of the FM radio and the option of a very large capacity SD card for music storage. I've not come across one published phone review, online or otherwise, that mentions audio quality, which is a serious omission for me.


January 28, 2017, 1:43 am

This is a great phone, BUT there is no notification light. periodically the screen turns on to alert you if you have a message.
This is really annoying!!!
In fact, i probably will switch phones because of this


March 6, 2017, 2:52 pm

If you get a good phone, you are saved or else you will have to go through the worst customer service. They took one and a half month to repair my Moto G4 Plus mobile which had some issues with it's screen.
1.Great camera.
2.Overall worthy.
3.Display is good.

1.Heats a lot.
2.The task bar hangs if upgraded to Nougat O.S.
3.MHL not supported (though we can use Chromecast).


March 13, 2017, 11:42 am

Sounds like some defect issues with the audio. I never had the audio issue Lonesome mentioned. Quality is as good as any phone I have used across the board. Bluetooth has worked flawlessly as well. The phone is big. But I don't find it "slippery" as others have. I mean it doesn't stay glued to your hand if you don't hold it or anything but, maybe that is just something that not bothers me.

caroline eadie

May 18, 2017, 11:16 pm

The Moto 4 plus has great audio it's an all-round fantastic phone I an really surprised it's so reasonably priced I used to buy Samsung phones but I honestly don't think they were any better than this phone I got it as soon as it came out due to pre ordering & still love the Moto G4plus plus


June 8, 2017, 7:44 am

On the subject of Moto 4G audio quality, two say it's great, two say
it's not. My advice is that if audio quality is important to you, as
it is to me, do some listening tests if you can. I recommend that if you are a classical music fan then beware, look elsewhere.

Audio quality is subjective and one's opinion will depend on the type of listening (music, speech, amplified natural acoustic) and very much on experience of listening critically, the quality of reproduction devices and one's ability to recognise audio distortion. I have listened to the Moto 4G Plus through high quality headphones and a decent separates audio system. My judgement, based on 40 years of critical listening of live and reproduced acoustic music and speech through audio systems costing many £1000's, is that the 4G Plus I bought and sold within 4 weeks had significant audio distortion that I judged to be characteristic, not a sample fault. I bought a Galaxy A5 which has a much smoother and inoffensive sound that I find much more acceptable, however it's not as good as the more open, dynamic & detailed sound from my iPod.

comments powered by Disqus