Home / TVs & Audio / Headphones / Monster Beats Solo HD

Monster Beats Solo HD review

Andrew Williams



1 of 17

Monster Beats Solo HD review 21
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 21
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 1
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 2
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 3
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 17
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 18
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 19
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 14
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 11
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 10
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 8
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 7
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 16
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 15
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 13
  • Monster Beats Solo HD review 6


Our Score:



  • Comfortable
  • Good design
  • Dual cables


  • Muddy sound

Key Features

  • Removable cable
  • Dual cables, one with ControlTalk housing
  • Glossy black finish
  • Right-angle jack
  • Leather pads
  • Manufacturer: Monster
  • Review Price: £126.70

The Beats by Dr. Dre range of headphones has only been around since 2008, but in the few years of its existence, it has become the most popular "trendy" range of cans in the western world. It has arguably brought headphones into the consciousness of normal gadgets buyers more than any other range in living memory. But are the Beats Solo HD, the higher-end version of the range's on-ear Solo set, any good?

A big part of the reason for the Beats range's success, other than that big, bad rap singer name, is design. All the headband sets maintain a consistent look that is undeniably stylish. They're simple enough to appear genuinely tasteful but distinct enough to become iconic - edgy enough to nudge its way into youth culture without causing an instant, despairing sigh in anyone over the age of 22. Of course, step back during the commuter rush and you realise they're really just the youth-oriented high street alternative to Bose's now fully-grown range of headphones - but don't tell Dr. Dre.

Monster Beats Solo HD review 8

Hardware-wise, the Beats Solo HD are fairly traditional, but do not put a foot wrong. Made largely of glossy black and soft-touch red plastic, they could easily appear cheap but the finish is in fact very good. There's also a thick band of metal that runs through the middle of the headband, giving it a good balance of strength and flexibility. All told they straddle the priorities of weight and build successfully.

Monster Beats Solo HD review 16

The on-ear cushioning pads are topped with real leather, and are soft and comfy. They are among the most comfortable on-ear headphones we've tested. On-ear headphones can cause discomfort for those with more sensitive ears, as they rest directly on them but less so than usual here. The ear cups swivel a few degrees both horizontally and vertically, making them adjust to your head's lumps and bumps automatically, and eliminating most fit problems occasionally associated with this type of headphone.

There's just one odd choice to the Solo HD - the headband padding is finished with a squidgy rubbery substance that anyone who played with a Stretch Armstrong back in the 90s will remember. We would have expected padded leather, but this almost-sticky material lets the headband stay very slim while sticking on your head reliably and providing good comfort - although we can't attest to how it feels against a shaved head.

Monster Beats Solo HD review

Noise isolation is fairly good too, the inch-thick pads creating a reasonable seal between your ears and the outside world. This makes the Beats Solo HD better-suited than many over-ear headphones for use on public transport - a good thing given how frequently we see them worn on trains and buses - though in-ear headphones or noise cancelling sets provide another level of noise reduction.

Another big win for the flexibility of these headphones is its removable cable. A standard 3.5mm stereo jack plugs into the bottom of the left ear cup, making it very simple to upgrade to a longer cable - you can snag a 5m upgrade from everyone's favourite auction site for a couple of quid. The bundled cables do offer some neat custom tweaks, though. The jacks bear the Monster and Beats branding, and the cable is finished in the trademark Beats red. Two cables are included in the box - both of just over 1m in length - one bearing a ControlTalk handsfree and remote housing, the other doing without.

Monster Beats Solo HD review 19

Much in the same way as the iPhone design has become too common to be assessed without looking through the prism of its success, the Monster Beats range is too popular to be abstracted entirely from its associations. They are good-looking headphones, but we find their brash links to "urban cool" a little ugly.

Monster Beats Solo HD review 18

Aside from the headphones and the pair of cables, the box also includes a neat neoprene carry case and a cleaning cloth (a red one, naturally). The case isn't there to provide absolute protection, but as the headphones fold up across a strong metal hinge in the headband, it makes more sense as an accessory than usual.


February 15, 2012, 7:52 pm

"They are good-looking headphones, but we find their brash links to "urban cool" a little ugly."

Depends on what you consider ugly. People who look like me, wearing similar cans (Studio) to me, like very similar music to me, I don't consider ugly.

Point me to a marketing campaign from Bose, where they have targeted the likes of me -- urban.

Got nothing against your review, but think people hate on beats because its has not required the 'mainstream' to become sucessfull.



February 15, 2012, 10:14 pm

I'm probably just embittered because they highlight quite how not-urban and not-cool I am. Although I'm not part of the Bose target audience either, thankfully.

Suggesting that Beats and its implied cultural associations are anything but mainstream might be stretching it a bit though...


March 20, 2012, 7:15 pm

So Dre isn't mainstream? If they had put Beats by Jim you think they'd be as successful?

I think a lot of people hate on Beats because much like Bose they are very much over-priced for the performance you get and you would see much better $ value from Sennheiser, AKG and several other headphone manufacturers.


January 18, 2013, 7:20 am

They are over priced, but a big percentage of the profit goes towards battered women and dogs, or so I have been old, hence the name Beats. Over all, I'd say, in order to prevent the battering of women and dogs more people should step outside the box and get their Beat on...just not beating on women and dogs but.

Richard Chien

February 19, 2013, 1:53 am

how bout the magnet type and the frequency response?


June 5, 2014, 4:46 am

WTF? Yet another brain addled individual hypnotised by the corporate beast called Beats; which IS mainstream. Reality check ... reality check in aisle 6!
Those people who hit on Beats actually appreciate headphones that reproduce music in a more neutral, much more uncoloured and much more accurate way - typically without the shite and briny hype and extra expense (yes, half this price and these headphones might actually be close to reasonable value) that Beats repesent - and of course, sheeples of the world fall for. Pfft. you say? They look way cooler than the others. Well sheeples, when you have wasted all your good listening years on the likes of Beats don't come running with your bleeding ears to me. Why do you think Apple and Dictator (oops my bad ... Dr.) Dre merged?. Because they are a match made in heaven. The old saying remains true; A fool and his money are soon parted.


October 4, 2014, 12:46 am

Hilarious but absolute bollocks!

comments powered by Disqus