Samsung Unveils Widest Ever 23in Monitor

Author Gordon Kelly
Published 11th Nov 2008
Samsung Unveils Widest Ever 23in Monitor
Bookmark and Share discuss this article  8 comments    Email  Email trustedreviews newslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

While the debate about 16:10 verses 16:9 monitors continues to rage Samsung has decided to spice things up ever further...

With the 16:9 23in (yes, another size to add to the list) '2342BWX' the giant-of-virtually-everything has produced a typical word first: the World's First QWXGA monitor.


Now for those struggling with their resolution acronyms (happens to me daily, even after all these years) QWXGA translates to 2048 x 1152 and for those with a typical 1680 x 1050 22in display I can sense you high fiving from here. Ideal for fitting two A4 pages side by side, giving Outlook some much needed breathing space or garnering that extra little bit of vertical height this is a resolution I could really get behind - apart from one thing: Samsung's reasoning behind it.

You see far from extolling these considerable virtues, the famous Korean family business is instead saying the 2342BWX was made with the inspiration that it would enable users to keep the Windows Vista sidebar in full view at all times. Yep, the same Windows Vista sidebar of which Microsoft has quickly backtracked and disabled by default from Windows 7. Oh dear.


That aside, we don't get any brightness, contrast ratio or response times for the 2342BWX and availability is initially only in Korea so the cautious among you may remain somewhat hesitant. For everyone else, the expected 399,000 won RRP (£192) shouldn't prove overly intimidating - though running Crysis Warhead might prove rather more of a challenge...

Link:
via Akihabara

discuss this article  8 comments
Email this article to a friend Email
Bookmark and Share
 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 4 of 8 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

comment cjb110 said on 11th November 2008

I thought the actual reasoning behind the res was to have two a4 vertical pages and still have space (for sidebar, or desktop icons or whatever)

comment Horace Coker said on 11th November 2008

Why say 16:10 and not 8:5?

comment Joe said on 11th November 2008

@Horace: because it is easier to visualise 16:10 to 16:9 than 8:5 to 16:9.

comment Horace Coker said on 12th November 2008

Joe: something in that!

See all 8 comments on this article.

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.