Refine search for Mobile Phones
HP iPAQ Voice Messenger Smartphone Review
| Author | Niall Magennis |
| Published | 22nd Dec 2008 |
| Manufacturer | HP |
| Supplier | Vodafone |
| Price | From Free on Contract |
| Latest Price | Click here |
| Design | ![]() |
| Features | ![]() |
| Performance | ![]() |
| Value | ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() |
Although it's not touch-sensitive, the Voice Messenger's screen is actually pretty good. It takes up just over half of the front real-estate on the phone and thanks to its 320 x 240 resolution text and icons look very crisp and sharp. It also does a good job of displaying pictures and videos as colours look bright and vibrant.
The handset is built around Windows Mobile 6.1. By default this is set to use a slightly tweaked version of the Sliding Panels home screen, which looks good and is easy to use. However, the traditional Window Mobile mess of menus behind this home screen still remain in place. On the plus side you do get the mobile Office suite of applications including Word and Excel so you can edit work documents while you're on the go. HP has also loaded some extras including the welcome addition of the Opera Mobile Browser (v8.65) and the Westek Jetcet viewer for displaying PDF files.

The phone's Qualcomm 7201A processor is clocked at 528MHz and keeps everything ticking over at sprightly pace, plus there's 128MB of RAM and 256MB of flash memory for storing files. You can supplement this using microSD cards of up to 8GB in size, but the card slot is rather awkwardly placed. It's mounted on the side of the phone, but you have to take the battery cover off to get at it. It would have been much more sensible to provide access via a simple flap like on most other handsets.
Browsing the web with Opera is suitable speedy as the handset supports both Wi-Fi and HSDPA. The latter can't be used for video calls, however, as HP has only included a single rear-facing camera. This has a 3.1-megapixel resolution and features both autofocus and an LED flash for taking pictures in low light. The quality isn't too bad - it's certainly good enough for taking the odd picture for your blog or something similar - but snaps don't really stand up that well to really close scrutiny.
Latest 4 of 4 Comments
Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.
Yas said on 22nd December 2008
Jay Werfalli said on 22nd December 2008
On average around 50 per cent of our total review output uses stock imagery. The rest uses photos taken by ourselves. Most (not all) reviews undertaken by our freelance writers use... more
Martin Daler said on 23rd December 2008
Jay, you are looking down the wrong end of the telescope! Turn it the other way about. Start from the point of view that the pictures are part of the review (self-evident really), ... more
Ed said on 23rd December 2008
To run with your analogy...
You're using the wrong instrument. You're looking at TR from afar and drawing conclusions from the weird murky patterns you see... more
See all 4 comments on this article.
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.




4 comments
Email
TrustedReviews Newsletters
Ok.. i have to ask;
Why dont TR ever take their own photos of the reviewed item? Granted on some reviews they do take their own, but mostly (esp phones) the manufact... more