Refine search for Mobile Phones

HP iPAQ 914c Business Messenger Review

Author Jonathan Bray
Published 19th Aug 2008
Manufacturer HP
Price £304.35 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £350.00 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price Click here
Design Score 6 for Design
Features Score 9 for Features
Performance Score 8 for Performance
Value Score 7 for Value
Overall Score 7 for Overall
HP iPAQ 914c Business Messenger
Video Review click here
Bookmark and Share Watch video review  Watch Video Review    discuss this article  7 comments    Email  Email trustedreviews newslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

The main reason for the 914c's size and heft, it would seem, is its enormous battery. Crack open the rear panel of the 914c and you'll find a lithium-polymer battery whose 1,940mAh capacity is bigger than anything else I've come across on any Windows Mobile smartphone. This leads to good longevity: around two to three days with push email switched on and even longer (three to four days) if you choose to switch that off. But even here, it's still no better than the Nokia. In fact, I'd say that the E71 is actually a little better, and its Exchange client also gives you more flexibility and control over what times of the day and week push email is used. This allows you to eke the maximum possible battery life out of the phone without having to keep switching it on and off all the time.


And the longer you use the 914c, the more you realise just how good its main rival, the Nokia E71, actually is. Its specification, for instance, isn't anything to be sniffed at. There's tri-band HSDPA for speeds of up to 7.2Mbit/sec in addition to GPRS, EDGE and quad-band GSM. You get Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and a GPS receiver that works pretty well, plus a 3.0-megapixel camera complete with LED flash. The 914c has a 416MHz processor and 128MB of RAM, which push Windows Mobile along at a fair old lick, and a reasonable 256MB of ROM for application and file storage (plus a microSD card slot for expanding that further). But the E71 manages to match that (almost) stride for stride. It lacks the faster 7.2Mbit/sec HSDPA compatibility, but has everything else that matters, adds a front-facing camera for video calls where the HP has none, and is at least as quick and responsive.


There are a few areas where the iPAQ does have the edge, especially with document editing and creation. Though the Nokia is equipped with QuickOffice 4.1, this can't compete with the iPAQ's Microsoft Office Mobile, which can edit and create Office 2007-compatible documents. Synchronisation via ActiveSync with Outlook is more effective and elegant than it is with Nokia's bloatsome PC Suite, and the iPAQ can be charged via USB where the E71 must be plugged into the mains.

Verdict

When considered on its own, HP's iPAQ 914c isn't a bad phone at all. In fact it's among the better Windows Mobile BlackBerry copies around. The keyboard is good, the screen not bad, it's stuffed with features and the battery life is impressive.

But it's hard to recommend a phone when in almost every area that matters it is outstripped by the best the competition can muster. Nokia's E71 is just as well-stocked with features and just as usable as the 914c but it manages to squeeze everything into a slimmer, sleeker, far sexier device, and one that's even a little cheaper.

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 4 of 7 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

comment Oliver Levett said on 21st August 2008

I have to disagree with one of your points...

The WM Exchange client is (once you know where M$ put things!) very configurable. Peak times can be set for any day(s) ... more

comment purephase said on 24th August 2008

I think handsets like this really hit home just how good the E71 is. Better in every respect (unless as Garf pointed out you absolutely must have Windows Mobile).

W... more

comment nick4511 said on 18th September 2008

Hi I bought my HP IPAQ914C Last week & so far i am pretty happy with its performance . being a long time windows mobile user i have had/owned my fair share of WM Phones ...i mu... more

comment Jim Simpson said on 10th October 2008

I've had it for a month now and I'm very pleased. It replaces an MDA Compact III whose biggest problem was a very slow processor. The 914c is much faster: I'm using ... more

See all 7 comments on this article.

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.