TrustedReviews

Home
TVs & Entertainment
Cameras
Laptops & Computing
Mobile & GPS
Video Reviews

Home » TVs & Entertainment » Blu-ray Player » Marantz UD7006 » Compare prices

Compare Prices for Marantz UD7006

More Photos

The UD7006 is a formidable Blu-ray player, boasting build quality and performance to die for, and for serious cinephiles that’ll be the bottom line. But anyone who’s after sexy smart features and easy-to-use DLNA streaming might be better off checking out cheaper competition. Read full review

Overall

8/10

Write your own review

By Danny Phillips
Reviewed 16 January 2012
Updated 18 January 2012

Price as reviewed

£499.95

$999 Buy now

	$999	Buy now

compare more prices

Review
User Reviews
Comments
9 Photos
Compare Prices

Price comparison powered by

Prices, delivery and availability at 1 retailer
	$999	Go

Awards

Marantz UD7006 details

Design: 9/10
Features: 7/10
Performance: 9/10
Value: 7/10
Overall: 8/10

Pros & Cons

Pros

Sublime Blu-ray pictures
Stunning sound quality
High-quality construction
No Wi-Fi

Cons

Limited internet content
Couldn’t get streaming to work

Price as reviewed

£499.95

Manufacturer

Marantz

Blu-ray Player round-ups

3D Blu-Ray Movies

We look at the popular 3D blu-ray movies available today, from Avatar to Thor and everything in between.

More Blu-ray Player Round-ups

TrustedReviews newsletter

Get TrustedReviews' award-winning reviews, opinions and advice delivered to your inbox for free!

Three of the best High end Blu-ray Players

Panasonic DMP-BDT500

Our rating:

9/10

User rating:

5/10

Panasonic goes all high-end with this luxury Blu-ray deck.
Samsung BD-D8900M

Our rating:

9/10

User rating:

2/10

Convergence is king with Samsung’s 3D Blu-ray deck with built-in 1TB hard disk and Freeview HD
Onkyo BD-SP809

Our rating:

8/10

Onkyo’s flagship Blu-ray deck delivers knockout performance but lacks a couple of key features

User reviews & comments

Comments

To leave a comment log in or sign up

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

We encountered a problem recommending this user.

pluck_user_recommend_permission

You have recommended this user.

Type Comment
(optional)

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

Send Cancel

Please wait while we perform your request.

Name withheld

John McLean

6:13 AM on 17 January, 2012

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore John McLean. Show Details Hide Details

I still think perceived picture benefits on expensive Blu-Ray decks are the emperor's new clothes - you've spent big bucks so the picture must be better, right? Digital source, digital output, and any processing should be done in the TV not the deck, so shouldn't a budget deck produce an identical bitstream? I'd like to see a true blind test between an £800 deck and an £80 one.

Abuse reported Report abuse

Score:

0 replies1 reply

Please wait while we perform your request.

What Do You Think?

To leave a comment, you need to sign up.

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

Report Abuse

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.