Our Score


User Score


  • Unbelievably cheap
  • Well built
  • Enjoys some plasma picture benefits


  • No Freeview HD tuner
  • Not full HD resolution
  • Limited multimedia facilities

Review Price £499.99

Key Features: 50in plasma screen; It costs under £520; JPEG and MP3 playback via USB; Picture Wizard; ISF endorsement

Manufacturer: LG

With all the shiny new 2011 TV models waiting in the wings, there are some remarkable bargains to be had on 2010's ranges if you’re willing to sniff them out. But no other potential bargain we’ve seen quite compares with LG’s 50PJ350.

For this 50in plasma TV can currently be yours for just £516.34. Yes, that’s £516.34. Good grief. If things carry on like this, you’ll soon be able to get a 15in LG TV for tuppence.

With a price as low as this, it probably doesn’t matter if the 50PJ350 is actually any good or not. There will surely be plenty of people out there unable to resist the simple screen size/cost equation, no matter how iffy the TV’s performance standards might turn out to be.

If you’re taking the time to read this review, however, chances are you’re a bit more discerning than your average impulse bargain buyer. So while we must always have the 50PJ350’s truly remarkable price in the forefront of our mind throughout this review, we will certainly be keeping a sharp eye out for the inevitable compromises LG must have made in order to put together the set so cheaply.

Probably the single most glaring ‘compromise’ of the 50PJ350 is its use of an HD Ready 1,366 x 768 resolution rather than the full HD 1,920 x 1,080 pixel count we now expect of almost every TV we see.

It's also no surprise that the 50PJ350 doesn’t sport a Freeview HD tuner - just a standard definition Freeview one. Furthermore, the set only boasts two HDMIs, and doesn’t go nearly as big a bundle on multimedia features as most LG sets; there are no online services, and the only files a single provided USB port can handle are JPEGs and MP3s. Video playback from USB is not on the menu.

There is one area where the 50PJ350 is impressively well specified, though: picture setup tools. In fact, the set carries a couple of ISF picture preset slots - where ISF stands for, of course, the independent Imaging Science Foundation, which only lends its name to TVs it deems flexible enough to be professionally calibrated by one of its trained engineers.

Next page


March 4, 2011, 12:41 pm

you can get the LG 50PK350 50" Full HD version for under £500 so I'm thinking there would be little or no reason to buy this?

Michael G

March 4, 2011, 1:56 pm

chrism the cheapest I found that set for is 595 - still a fair point though because that's only an £80 difference. STILL - it's amazing that they've come down so much in price. I was thinking of getting a 32" Bravia LCD for £460, now I'm not so sure...


March 4, 2011, 3:01 pm

Your right Michael it seems to have gone up in price last few days, last week several large retails had it for under £500, always pays to be on the look out for a deal!


March 4, 2011, 4:48 pm

£535 is the cheapest I can find the full HD version at Price comp sites still list it as under £500 but those prices have indeed gone.... Still at £535 its a bargain for that screen size and you only need it for a display as opposed to tuning etc...


November 1, 2013, 1:48 pm

Had this TV for a year, the power board went out. LG denies any knowledge of problem, however three TV tech's that I spoke with stated that this is an ongoing problem with this model. LG wants big $$ for new board.


January 22, 2014, 4:24 am

Came across a guy at work that wants to sell me the 50PJ350 for $400. Am I getting a good deal or should I go for $350? Or should i just stay away?

Kyle Dobson

September 19, 2014, 4:40 am

I have had mine since 2011, it has never missed a beat any picture that burns in is easily reset and cleared using the picture reset tool, only one downside is that the glass is a glossy glass finish so you will get glare from surrounding light sources. I bought mine or $670 brand new, I'd ask $300 and see what he says after that $350 sounds fair.

comments powered by Disqus