TrustedReviews Awards 2008 Comments
| Author | TrustedReviews |
| Published | 25th Nov 2008 |
Comments for TrustedReviews Awards 2008
nelee123 said on 25th November 2008
ruthless said on 25th November 2008
Apple Mac Book - best design?? You been drinking?
Cub said on 25th November 2008
Don't forget that design isn't *just* about how sexy something looks (although, even if it was the MacBook could well still win it), but also about the internal design. In this instance, Apple's new laptops are revolutionary and well deserve the #1 spot.
Rsaeire said on 25th November 2008
Best design given to the MacBook? Pah! Revolutionary? More like evolutionary! Honestly, this is why I roll my eyes at Trusted Reviews staffers sometimes.
Yes, everyone is entitled to their opinion, but what exactly makes the MacBook the best designed laptop and the best designed product… period, of 2008? I would have given it to the Samsung printer over the MacBook easily. Even the Sony Ericcson XPERIA X1, Linksys WRT160N, Samsung LE-A656, Pioneer KRP-600M, I could keep going, were better designed.
Vij said on 25th November 2008
"but also about the internal design. In this instance, Apple's new laptops are revolutionary and well deserve the #1 spot."
Hahahaha, revolutionary indeed - with 4 GB RAM they are slowly catching up with late early 2000s Windows laptops.
Not a Mac basher here - check out the benchmarks at http://www.macworld.com/article/136881/boot_camp_gaming.html
13 FPS in Crysis in Vista, this is just painfully embarassing.
As for sexy looks there are none.
Andy said on 25th November 2008
Not sure anyone said it was revolutionary as a design. As noted above, it's as much about how it is made as how it looks, plus there's the usability, the touchpad, multi-touch and so forth, that also contributes. Besides, excluding the Pioneer (it didn't arrive in time for the awards unfortunately), none of those you list really jump out at you. Touch of colour on the Samsung is nice, but there's nothing about the rest of TV that strikes the eye.
PS:
Andy said on 25th November 2008
Okay, *we* didn't use the word revolutionary, though there might be an argument to say it is...
*runs away*
Vij said on 25th November 2008
Macbook - for being the most average, unexciting and overhyped hardware of 2008?
*runs away even quicker*
haim said on 25th November 2008
It's *design* you clowns.
Highlighting the amount of RAM just shows what you get when nerds make comments on design.
Would the design have been better with a 16 GB stick?
A single piece of alu, thats lush, as I would imagine is a big glass touchpad. This stuff looks awesome and is different from anything else.
There is a reason that EVERY person that works in the design world uses a mac (and an iphone now I have noticed). They live for good design, and they can spot it when Job's billions shoves it in their face. You could put my old Atari 800XL in this shell and they would buy it (ok its UI is slick too so I've gone a bit far there, though I might buy it to play Blue Max again).
Anyway if nerd talk is what you want: OSX is sweet on 2GB ram and ok on 1, maybe other laptops would settle for this if they didn't have to support Vista. Take that Gates!! yeah you heard me!
Xiphias said on 25th November 2008
I suppose at least the high-contrast design of the new macbook helps those with poor eyesight.
If you're not just considering appearance then what about all the design mistakes in the macbook? No firewire, no eSATA, a stupid proprietry video-out port, no blu-ray option and a glossy screen.
I'm surprised the X300 wasn't the top designed product, it sounds like a much more impressive piece of kit.
Ed said on 25th November 2008
1. Who gives a damn about the performance of playing games through bootcamp on a Macbook? It's not a gaming laptop.
2. It may not be revolutionary but multi-touch is unique and useful.
3. The aluminium chassis is again unique and actually quite practical.
4. The flush screen is a nice touch.
5. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and all that so I won't argue the aesthetic side too much but personally I think it looks great.
Of the products others have cited above as being better, few can claim any other 'good design' features other than looking nice and that's not enough to warrant an award.
Rsaeire said on 25th November 2008
The word "revolutionary" was taken from the 2nd poster’s comment. In addition, I don't understand how the items mentioned in my previous post could be easily dismissed without even a moment’s mention i.e. the X1 and the Linksys router; they look exceptional and deserve some recognition. I mean, if the iPhone can be glorified beyond believe, then at least another company's offering, that assist in quelling the fires of disgust regarding the lack of decent features on the iPhone, should be publically recognised.
Regarding the Pioneer, I think an update should be made to the awards, as it is not only built beautifully, it also has, as reviewed by Trusted Reviews, a separate connector module. Due to the ergonomic nature of this design, it allows a utilisation of functionality unparalleled by other manufacturers, and enables an expressionistic tour de force of modern design to excel where others could not.
I for one will look forward, and look closely, to Trusted Reviews’ awards 2009, and will no doubt see a blatant and apparent misuse of award handling there too.
Ed said on 25th November 2008
Of course, the irony here is that everyone's tripping over themselves to argue the merits of the least objective award of the lot. Frankly, we like the design of the Macbook. You can argue to the cows come home about what you think is better but when all is said and done it's very much a subjective choice.
The fact that so far no-one has complained about any of the other awards would suggest either we're not quite so corrupt/wrong as some people have suggested, many of you aren't quite so informed as you think you are so you're picking on the easy subject, or, that you're actually just having a whinge cause you don't like Apple's styling or just Apple products in general. Take your pick.
As for the Pioneer, as the review says, the seperate box is not a new idea. And aesthetically it's just another black slab.
The reasons I dismissed the other products, I have already given - they only look good. That alone is not enough.
haim said on 25th November 2008
Whats pioneering (ho ho see what I've done there?) about going back to a seperate connector box. The only thing it enables is plugging in your dvd player more easily....hold on I've just read the bit about the 'tour de force..' so I guess you are taking the mickey.......or copying out of a Pioneer brochure.
You take your seperate connector box and I'll take a laptop crafted from a single block of aluminium......hmmm...hold on I could do with a new tele.....
Wackywavinginflateablearmflailingtubeman said on 25th November 2008
I wonder how the Best Portable Notebook list would've looked if the Vaio TT had made it in time to be considered for the list. Guess we'll see next year...
If I had the money I'd buy a Thinkpad X301 no question. So I agree wholeheartedly with the X300 getting the top honour. I guess I'll have to settle for a M1330. :(
Gordon said on 25th November 2008
@Rsaeire - Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 is one really UGLY piece of kit, have you ever seen one in real life? (Please don't tell me you own one - naaasty handset).
Rsaeire said on 25th November 2008
Actually, the tour de force comment was my moment of clarity when I was channelling Pioneer. Not bad eh? ;)
@Gordon - Yes, I have seen the X1 and used one for a while too. In my opinion it looks great, feels great, except for maybe the keyboard, and the silver, which I didn't like in the press shots, is much more appealing in real life. I for one will be getting the black X1 shortly, and can honestly say that it will suit my needs much better than any other handset I have seen online or heard about this year, and looks better than most of the other handsets currently available.
A single piece of aluminium, in theory, is a great idea, but when it’s used to manufacture an average styled product, I have to look at those concerned with bringing the item to market and raise an eyebrow. I don’t agree with the comment referring to my “whinging” as I …”don’t like Apple's styling or just Apple products in general. I don’t not like Apple’s products in general, I just think a lot of them are purely over-priced for what you get. If you wish me to mention other manufacturers and their products that fall into the same category, such as Sony’s recent X series LCDs, the overpriced Pioneer LX71, the G1 or practically all Phillips’ “attempts” of TVs to date, then believe me, I will regale you with a story that will leave you firmly entranced.
azza21 said on 25th November 2008
@Gordon I own a Sony Xperia X1 and think its nice, each to their own eh.
Anyhow change of subject i thought trustedreviews get all the tech early, why was there no review of the Sony Vaio TT afteral you gave the TZ tops marks last year. So it would have been ideal to have done a review of it before this before this article. The TT has been out for nearly a month also. Nevermind, just wondering :)
Ed said on 25th November 2008
Sampling from manufacturers can vary. PR will often only get 3 or 4 samples of a product to pass round all the UK publications and each publication may hold onto a sample for up a month, say. So if you're not on the list first then you can be left waiting for quite a while.
As to us seeming to get stuff first, well we often do but sometimes manufacturers consciously rotate which publication gets an exclusive to keep us all happy. Other times it's simply that someone else got first dibs. The TT was seemingly an example of the former so we've only just got our sample in the office last week - and, no, that isn't long enough to turn around a review.
bara03 said on 25th November 2008
It's a shame there wasn't an award for best media player which hooks up to your TV.
Rsaeire said on 25th November 2008
A point I forgot to mention was that I mainly picked up on the best design award as it was the 2nd last award in the list and, therefore, was fresh on my mind. I thought I'd better mention it as I don't want to be accused again of whinging about not liking Apple's products in general. <rolls eyes>
Singularity said on 25th November 2008
The Macbook just had to get an award, but could only realistically get a subjective one: TR says it's pretty. IMHO design should be about more than just looking pretty (which is hard to argue with), in which case the Macbook with the malfunctioning touchpad, the overheating aluminium case, glossy, low resolution screen, etc. is really a joke.
On a more personal note: I don't even think that the looks are something to write home about...
PS.: Isn’t it funny that you always get these types of comments in conjunction with the same brand?
Singularity said on 25th November 2008
PS2: I also found it interesting that your main advertiser Panasonic won so many awards this year, from televisions to cameras...
Deemow26 said on 25th November 2008
And the award for best technology website for news and reviews goes to - 'Trusted Reviews' !!!
Dark of Day said on 25th November 2008
^^^ ...and that's why TR was better without the comments section.
Just to mention something other than a laptop
..Glad to see the Nikon D300 up top in the DSLR section
(Cliff; any chance of a D90 review?)
Dark of Day said on 25th November 2008
..I'll second what Deemow26 says
best tech site going :)
Ed said on 25th November 2008
Just one very quick point. Two people (at least) have cited the Macbook as being bad because it has a glossy screen. I'm sorry but that argument simply doesn't hold up. Whether you want a glossy screen is a very personal thing dependent on how you use it as both screen types have there advantages and disadvantages.
Ok, two points. The low resolution screen is also moot as nowadays it's rather difficult to get a higher resolution panel on that size of notebook. Sure you can get them but it's hardly a universal choice.
@Dark of the Day
You don't like that someone praised us?
D90 is coming very soon.
Pbryanw said on 25th November 2008
Most friendly Tech site going...
...and these awards would surely have benefited from a drop-down menu style navigation.
As it is I had to jump through 29 pages of awards, with no idea what was coming next.
Of course, reading about all the products more then made up for the navigation problems.
Ed said on 25th November 2008
Ah, sorry Dark of the Day. Your second comment hadn't been approved yet and i missed it.
Also just noticed your second comment, Singularity. Quite simply, only 6 out of the 75 products mentioned in this article are made by Panasonic and only 3 out of the 25 winners are Panasonic. Make of that what you will.
Andy said on 25th November 2008
@Pbryanw:
There is normally a drop down but there was a bug. It should be back very soon!
basicasic said on 25th November 2008
A pleasurable read about top notch kit. However shouldn't you be holding your 2008 awards ceremony after the year has ended? Its still only November.
Or is it your way of telling us there's nothing much to come between now and New Year ;)
purephase said on 25th November 2008
Can wholly endorse the Nokia E71 as best smartphone. Am typing this on mine right now and have given my blackberry back to my company because I can just use mail for exchange on this.
Other than that, it's hard to argue with too many choices here. Looks like 2008 has been more a year of consolidation, with top awards going to an improved iphone, better speakerdock and more iterations of Kuro etc. Here's hoping for some revolutionary changes in '09 (perhaps wishful thinking with research budgets probably slashed).
Oliver Levett said on 25th November 2008
You realised the iPhone isn't a smartphone! Finally, some sense!
I personally dislike the design of the new Macbook - why not have a nice aluminium effect keyboard? Black just looks wrong there (although, the same applies to the newer iMacs).
Wackywavinginflateablearmflailingtubeman said on 25th November 2008
One category I think you guys could have/should have added was "Best Company".
A list of companies that have stood out for its products and services. Companies that really are trying hard (like Apple) to be less harmful to the environment. Companies that have been pushing the boundaries of technology.
Michael said on 25th November 2008
What about the Vaio TT....
Could that beat X300? Its still 2008?
Riyad said on 25th November 2008
OK, I’ll get the MacBook out of the way first. As already pointed out, the best design award is just that, an award for the product that - in our opinion at least - looks great and functions well. Last year’s winner was the Ferguson Hill speakers, which are completely inappropriate for many consumers, but nonetheless looked fantastic and sounded pretty good too.
Again, it’s the general opinion in the office that the new MacBooks look and feel fantastic, and importantly, are a huge step forward from the outgoing model that suffered from worryingly fragile build quality. There is no evaluative testing or benchmarking for the design award - it’s there to commend companies for creating technology products with form as well as function.
@basicasic - As for the timing of the 2008 Awards - yes it’s not the end of the year yet, but it makes sense to do it now to give you all enough time to get your wish lists in to Santa! In fact, the vast majority of tech publications held their awards back in October - we know, because we gate crashed most of the parties - so we left ours relatively late.
@Ohmz - At the risk of spoiling the forthcoming review for you, the Best Portable Notebook category wouldn’t have looked any different if the Sony TT had arrived in time. However, if the retail sample of the Samsung X360 had arrived in time, it could well have ousted its sibling from the list. We do have a retail X360 now, and the full review will be published soon.
Riyad said on 25th November 2008
@Ohmz - Best company is a really tricky one, because it’s almost impossible to quantify or assess. I get what you’re saying about companies that are trying to be environmentally conscious though - Kyocera has been doing that for years, by creating printers with fewer consumables, while Panasonic removed all the lead from its plasma screen production a few years back.
The problem is that it’s difficult to assess who is making the most effort in this area, and whether it’s just for show. I have had an idea for a “Green Technology” section on TR for some time though. Maybe I’ll see if I can make that happen next year.
@Michael - No :)
Singularity said on 25th November 2008
@Ed - I have made two other comments on malfunctioning touch pads and overheating (both clearly a result of bad product design) besides the screen problems to support my point. Also, my Toshiba laptop (that I bought for £700 at a general retailer) in 2005 has a higher screen resolution than the winner of the design category today. I rest my case.
As to Panasonic: at least nominated in every category the have a product in (not counting the £15 headphones).
Riyad said on 25th November 2008
@Singularity - Is your £700 Toshiba notebook a 13in model? Because that's the point that Ed was making I think. Most 12.1in or 13in notebooks have a 1,280 x 800 resolution - it's not something I like, but that's the way it tends to be. There are exceptions, like the ThinkPad X300 and the Sony SZ, but until recently it wasn't uncommon to find even 15.4in notebooks with 1,280 x 800 screen resolution.
As for Panasonic being the "main advertiser" I'm afraid you're completely wrong there. Yes a Panasonic skin went live yesterday, but I can assure you that there are many advertisers who have spent far more money with TR in 2008.
However, even if the above wasn't true, I take personal umbrage with insinuations such as yours. I thought long and hard about the name of this publication before I launched it, and ever since I have done everything possible to keep true to that name and the ethos behind it. Of course I can’t make you believe one thing or another, and if you want to cast aspersions that’s your prerogative, it’s a democracy after all. Thankfully there are two million or so other readers who don’t agree with you.
Just to clarify your comment though “at least nominated in every category the have a product in (not counting the £15 headphones)” - Panasonic makes notebooks, yet it wasn’t nominated in any of the notebook categories. Panasonic makes home audio products, yet it wasn’t nominated in the Home Audio category. Panasonic makes Sat-Navs, yet it wasn’t nominated in the In Car category. Panasonic makes projectors, yet it wasn’t nominated in the projector category.
Any manufacturer that covers a great many sectors, and produces good products will find itself nominated in many categories, and potentially win some of them. In fact Samsung made it into 8 categories - so what’s your theory for that result?
Pbryanw said on 25th November 2008
@Singularity - Panasonic seem to be predominately nominated in the Home Cinema and Camera awards. Maybe, just maybe, this is because they make such good Home Cinema equipment and cameras - rather then some conspiracy theory on TR's behalf(??)
In fact, I probably wouldn't have noticed anything if this theory hadn't been brought up in the comments, as I didn't notice any bias on first read through.
Francesco Mastellone said on 25th November 2008
I liked this article a lot. Of course the most debatable choices were in the design category(personally I'd split it in a beauty and a usability category, but that's too late to opinate upon I guess!) but I find myself in agreement in most other regards. I'll only point out that if the 8800M > 9800M is anything like the 8800GT > 9800GT Nvidia naming scheme then it would be correct to say that the former has been "renamed into", not "replaced by" the latter, in the desktop replacement category.
Michael said on 25th November 2008
grrrr.... well i want to buy a laptop on Saturday, and this has been no help. well ok.. maybe some help.
I was going to get the Vaio TT..!!!!
i'll have to get the big fat 13inch Z11 now or you'll make me feel bad when you publish your review.
:-(
Gnormie said on 25th November 2008
@ Ohmz
I'm afraid Apple would not make the top of such a list, environmentally their new unibody enclosure is a waste of materials and just look at the new green peace charts if you want to see them ranked against others.
On the pushing boundaries, multitouch and kicking phone developers up the backside deserves a mention but I'd say the micro 4/3 camera system developed by Panasoic is much more 'pushing boundaries' as it gets rid of the mirror altogether!
And on standing out for products and services... again ouch, Apples support is hopeless (even Dell who are widely criticized, are better in my experience and I've dealt with the CS from both companies more then a few times). And their products look good and are a joy to use, but in this economic downturn I'd say 'standing out' would be delivering that beyond their niche market.
Singularity said on 25th November 2008
@ Riyad - if you read the comments above you will see that many had problems with the winner of the design category. As you mention as well, products in the same price class bring much better designs to the table, which pretty much the point I am making. I agree with you that these are the exceptions, which is exactly why these products deserve the awards!!! Besides, as mentioned before, there are other problems with the design of the Macbook as well, which you seem to glide over in all your replies.
Considering the above, the regular comments on your 'the iPhone is the best phone ever' approach, I would think that it is quite clear, which other company has spent lots of money with TR in 2008 than Panasonic...
Geoff Richards said on 25th November 2008
@Singularity - I take it you now believe Apple is our #2 advertiser then? Not that it has any impact whatsoever on Riyad & the team's reviews, but Apple in fact spent nothing with us in 2008.
You can retire your conspiracy theories. We are TRUSTED Reviews because everything we publish is 100% independent and unbiased. Over 2 million readers a month rely on our impartial advice. If we took cash for awards as you suggest we would've been finished years ago when, in fact, we are bigger than ever as we enter our 6th year.
Our advertising sales team isn't just on another floor of the building. They're 37 miles away and have no influence over our review scores or awards. End of story.
Any future comments to the contrary will be moderated appropriately as off-topic spam.
Singularity said on 25th November 2008
@ Pbryanw - how about the camcorders, both television categories? All this is most notable because both awarded Panasonic televisions are from the Viera family, which is advertised on the home page of this website. But why don't you just do this test: click on the TV tab and make a search for Panasonic; seems to be the only company that only produces products with an average of 9-10 points.
Riyad said on 25th November 2008
@Singularity - You failed to answer the question, is your £700 high resolution notebook a 13in model, and if so which one?
Yes there are 13.3in machines with resolutions higher than 1,280 x 800 as I pointed out, but the design award isn't about screen resolution, hence the fact that there's a printer and an iPod dock in there too. And both the exceptions I mentioned are in the Best Portable Notebook category, so they have been rewarded for their better than average screens.
As Geoff has already pointed out, having no come back with regard to Panasonic, you're now insinuating that we're biased towards Apple due to advertising support, when in fact Apple hasn't spent a single penny with TR this year.
I really don’t know what you’re trying to prove or achieve here, but as I said, we live in a democracy so go right ahead. I may not agree with your opinion, but I’ll fight for you right to have it - no matter how misguided.
Of course the other great thing about a democracy is freedom of choice, and if you don’t like the way we do things here, you can choose not to read the content.
Riyad said on 25th November 2008
@Singularity - “All this is most notable because both awarded Panasonic televisions are from the Viera family, which is advertised on the home page of this website.” - This just gets better and better…
That’s the basis for your theory, that the awards are for TVs from the “Viera family” which is being advertised, therefore making it sinister?
The Viera brand covers EVERY television that Panasonic manufactures, so yeah, it’s a strange coincidence that the chosen Panasonic TVs would be from the “Viera family”. First rate detective work!
Now let’s look at some other winners…
Bowers and Wilkins walked away with a category award and the Product Of The Year award and has never advertised on TR.
Road Angel won the Best In Car award and has never advertised on TR.
InFocus won the Best Projector award and has never advertised on TR.
Alienware won the Best Desktop Replacement Notebook award and has never advertised on TR.
Onkyo won the Best Home Cinema award and has never advertised on TR.
Pure won the Best DAB award and has never advertised on TR.
Sennheiser won the best PC accessory award and has never advertised on TR.
And of course Apple we’ve already covered. So if we were, as you suggest, handing out awards to advertisers, we’re not doing a very good job.
OldTimer said on 25th November 2008
@Singularity
As an industry veteran of too many years and someone who knows Riyad not personally but by his professional reputation and that of his team.
You are so far off the mark you are laughable.
No further comment required.
Singularity said on 25th November 2008
@ Riyad - and I compliment you on your approach to the comments, as opposed to the rather dictatorial direction Geoff is taking.
As to trying to prove of achieve sthing: there is nothing to it, just trying to bring a different and less biased point of view in case of some brands (mentioned above).
You are of course right with the freedom of choice, however you got to love the objectivity of some of your reviewers: Sandra’s very strict and impartial phone reviews jump to mind immediately. Would have loved to read her take on the iPhone but unfortunately that was done by someone else. She and others keep some of us here reading, but when the Macbook gets a reward you just have to comment.
Singularity said on 26th November 2008
@ OldTimer - what I find laughable is that you don't see a problem with the advertised TV of a sponsor winning in one of the two categories for televisions and another being third in the other. Besides, not sure what the reason is for your personal attack is; I have merely commented on the bias in favour of cerain brands.
Pbryanw said on 26th November 2008
@Singularity - I did a search as suggested and Philips, Samsung and Pioneer seemed to come up just as regularly as Panasonic. In fact, in the 33-42 and 43-52 inch TV categories, none of the top five hits received back were from Panasonic.
I think if TR's reviews were indeed influenced by advertising, as I think you are insinuating, then they would be on a dangerous, slippery slope downwards; while all the evidence suggests otherwise.
Geoff Richards said on 26th November 2008
I see the debate has continued through the night... if I must continue to fuel the fire, let me just say this. The timelines for picking the winning TV under £1000 and reskinning our homepage were completely separate. These decisions took place in separate offices and in line with our continuing maintenance of the utmost editorial independence and integrity, the left hand did not know what the right hand was doing, so to speak.
Please don’t confuse the Q4 marketing strategy of one of the world’s largest consumer electronics brands with the independent recognition of the best products of 2008.
Indeed, if you look closely, you will see that Panasonic’s campaign is about promoting their Freesat HD-enabled TVs, and the winning model, the Viera TH-42PX80, is not one of these. If we were as bent as you suggest you’d think we would have at least given it to the TX-32LZD81 or TH-46PZ81.
How much more evidence is required?
OldTimer said on 26th November 2008
@Singularity. So by your logic advertising means you should not win any awards? WTF!
You are making a very personal attack on the credibility of people and in particular an editor who is well known for being of the highest integrity and who I know works unbelieveable hours to deliver for readers of this site (well he always did under HC ;)) . I only have experience of journalists in the IT sector and I can tell you that the very hint of playing the advertising card to garner good reviews or awards would, from what I have seen from the actions of others, result in just the opposite.
As other posters highlight you are guilty of not letting the facts get in the way of your rather flawed argument.
ravmania said on 26th November 2008
I think its been a disappointing year gear wise. As has been said it mostly been evolutionary. I can't say that I'm super excited about any one product. Last year I'd have bitten your hand off for a TZ or a Kuro. I still wouldn't say no this year but my enthusiasm isn't as big for their successors.
Still, as others have said, great site!! Please keep it up.
@Riyad
Will catch you again for some more Horde soon. Was a bit late on Friday.
davef said on 26th November 2008
This is getting absurd. Anyone who scans the web for reviews before purchases will see how highly regarded Panasonic TVs and cameras are at the moment. Check out AVForums for a start. I bet all those people praising their Panasonic sets have been paid off too.
As for best design, too me this is the least interesting category. If I'm going to make a decision on a purchase, many other factors are likely to inform my decision.
Trying to broaden the scope of this discussion a bit. It would have been nice to have had some cheaper components in the Best Home Cinema category. I understand by its nature that good AV/Home Cinema isn't cheap, but maybe next year you could sub-divide it into price points similar to what you did with TVs.
Other than that, a very good round up, and will be a good source of information for making purchasing decisions in, hopefully, a cheaper 2009. Hi-end technology is one area where we could see some interesting price reductions IF the 2.5% VAT cut gets passed on.
Rsaeire said on 26th November 2008
After reading through the comments posted after my own yesterday afternoon, it seems the consensus of the general readership is that the MacBook should not have been awarded the best design award 2008. The fact that it is the opinion of Trusted Reviews, and likely will not be changed, doesn't dampen my enthusiasm or glee that I am not in the minority. As mentioned yesterday, I look forward to next year's awards which will no doubt be as eventful.
@ravmania - I agree with your comment regarding lacklustre advances in this year's technology. Most items that I am interested in, or have bought, this year are merely evolutionary in their respective fields, rather than revolutionary. The Wii is the last item I can recall that really revolutionised the market. The fact that a Sony console could be usurped from pole position in the gaming industry would have been deemed blasphemous if stated in 2004, but here we are, with Sony's latest console in last place. I always had faith in Nintendo, as they have been pioneers in the gaming industry since practically its inception, and will no doubt continue to do so for a long time yet.
In addition, how exactly could an iPod dock take best product of the year? I understand that this year has been revolutionarily redundant, with regard to products, but it is a sad day when all that is left at the top of the heap, by Trusted Reviews’ viewpoint, is an iPod dock. Honestly, these have been out for years in many shapes and forms. There is a plethora of options, all doing, basically, the same thing, yet this one item somehow sits atop of not only the aforementioned lot, but every single product released this year. When an accessory for an overhyped product receives the most prestigious award in a collection of awards, it is a sad day for us all.
And before I am accused of not liking Apple, yet again, I find 3rd place in the “Best Smartphone” category should have went to either the Nokia E51, as it drove smartphones into the hands of the general consumer due to its diminutive size, chrome accented design and excellent feature set, or the Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 due to its unique panel interface, high-resolution touchscreen display, a slide-out keyboard, so thankfully users won’t be dependent on sub-par virtual keyboards, and an excellent range of wireless connectivity. I also find that Sony’s KDL-32W4000 LCD should have got a look-in in the “Best TV under £1,000”.
Riyad said on 26th November 2008
@Rsaeire - I’m assuming that you’ve never listened to the B&W Zeppelin. Saying that there are loads of other iPod docks doesn’t change the fact that the Zeppelin has moved the game into another league. What you’ve got is one of the world’s finest speaker manufacturers creating a mainstream product, but without compromising quality - a rare feat indeed.
By your rationale though, why should we be impressed with the Pioneer Kuro? After all, just like iPod docks, TVs - “have been out for years in many shapes and forms. There is a plethora of options, all doing, basically, the same thing”.
Your argument suggests that any product that is an evolution of existing technology does not deserve recognition. Well, that would leave us with a very short list of contenders.
Ultimately though, as I have always said in situations like this - Have you actually used each and every product we reviewed this year? Because surely for you to say that X should have been given an award over Y, you need to have evaluated X and Y, as well as all their competitors. Which, funnily enough, is what we do each and every day.
Darfuria said on 26th November 2008
I completely agree with the Macbook design award; it's a beautiful notebook. In fact, you tend to find that the majority of people that slate Macbooks are those who compare the specifications to those required for a notebook to run Vista well, or the people who are conforming and hating for no particular reason.
With regards to the MP3 players though - iPod Classic all the way.
Rsaeire said on 26th November 2008
For the record, I have used almost every item I listed in the last two paragraphs of my comment; the only exclusion being the B&W Zeppelin.
My comment regarding the iPod dock was in reference to the fact that it is just an iPod dock; nothing more, nothing less. And honestly, how can a comparison be made between an iPod dock and a TV. You cannot use a portion of my comment in an attempt to twist it to suit your needs; next you will be comparing a smartphone and a desktop PC.
You should be impressed by the Kuro, even if it is not evolutionary, nether is the Zeppelin, due to the comment I made yesterday in regards to why it should have claimed the best design award; I have included it below for your perusal:
“Regarding the Pioneer, I think an update should be made to the awards, as it is not only built beautifully, it also has, as reviewed by Trusted Reviews, a separate connector module. Due to the ergonomic nature of this design, it allows a utilisation of functionality unparalleled by other manufacturers, and enables an expressionistic tour de force of modern design to excel where others could not.”
Granted, the separate connector module is not unique, as it was present on a past Pioneer model, but blessed with the sleek lines of the display, and the astounding functionality the display offers, it should surely have been given the top-spot over the Zeppelin.
Riyad said on 26th November 2008
@Rsaeire - that's my point, the Zeppelin is not "just an iPod dock" as you seem intent on saying. Saying that the Zepplin is "just an iPod dock" is to all intents and purposes like saying the Kuro is "just a TV". Unfortunately, since you freely admit that you have never listened to a Zeppelin, you can't appreciate that.
I on the other hand own both a Zeppelin and a 2nd Gen Kuro and use them every day in my home. So when it came down to deciding which one received the top spot, it was a tough decision, but one that I was well qualified to make.
And you having experience of the products you mentioned in your comment isn't the point. The issue is that you haven't evaluated all the products that we tested this year, and therefore are not in a position to say that one thing is more deserving than another.
Yes, your experience lets you say that you like a product, but you can’t say that it’s better than something else if you haven’t used that other product. You’re saying that the Sony KDL-32W4000 TV should have been in the Best TV Under £1,000 category, so does that mean you have tested the three TVs that are on the list? If not, how can you say that the Sony is better than any of them?
Darfuria said on 26th November 2008
@Riyad - Because he's on the Internets, and therefore his opinion is right, duh... ;)
I haven't heard anything from you in a long long time, by the way.
Rsaeire said on 26th November 2008
Any reader commenting on this or other threads in relation to technology products will of course not have tested every single product in a particular field, but that does not mean their opinion is any less relevant. Trusted Reviews does not review every single technology product, within every single technology category available in the UK, so by the same rationale, can you say that Trusted Reviews' opinion is all encompassing and all knowing? Of course not. I would think that a user's opinion, based upon their use of certain items and their perusal of other review sources, is clear evidence of the good and bad items that are currently available in the market. Since other review sites, with regard to disc players and TVs, show factual evidence of tests carried out on items, it would be quite evident from that fact that certain items would be technically superior or inferior, as the case may be, to each other as factual evidence, and not anecdotal, can be used as a barometer of quality and technical prowess.
Gordon said on 26th November 2008
@Rsaeire - that reads as if it was written by lawyers ;) But fair enough.
Darfuria said on 26th November 2008
Mmmm, grammar fap. Though, not really an answer to the question.
Riyad said on 26th November 2008
@Rsaeire - Hmmmm what an interesting point you make "Trusted Reviews does not review every single technology product, within every single technology category available in the UK, so by the same rationale, can you say that Trusted Reviews' opinion is all encompassing and all knowing?"
You're right, we don't review every product in the world, but since the annual awards are only given to products we HAVE reviewed, your point bears no relevance to the issue at hand.
Actually I welcome opinion and feedback from my readers, which is why we have a comments section. What I was trying to say though, is that for any individual, myself included, to state that one thing is better than another, they need to have experience of both things.
Riyad said on 26th November 2008
@Darfuria - you're right mate. Been extremely hectic lately, but that's always my excuse isn't it? Will drop you a line next week - promise.
Darfuria said on 26th November 2008
@Riyad
Using OS X is better than being stabbed in the face. Oh, here we go.
Yeah, it's always your excuse, but I'll let you off as I have been too busy to hassle you about it constantly as well. Regardless, I look forward to hearing from you.
Rsaeire said on 26th November 2008
What you're basically saying then is that nobody can comment on the awards if they haven't used all the items contained within. If that is the case, then the comments section for this article shouldn’t exist because, apart from other review websites and people with an inordinate amount of money and a lot of spare time, nobody else could have used all the items reviewed by Trusted Reviews to fall into your criteria for having a valid opinion.
I am also glad that opinions and feedback is welcomed by the staff of Trusted Reviews, as us mere mortals would be then oblivious to how the staff thinks.
Darfuria said on 26th November 2008
@Rsaeire - Honestly, how many paragraphs of drivel do you have to type before you accept a point without grabbing it by the hand and skipping through the park of delusion and misunderstanding?
It's pretty obvious that if you've only used one of three products, then your rights to say that the product you have used is better than the other two products are unjust because you haven't compared them all.
Rsaeire said on 26th November 2008
Well, if I want to reach the sheer amount of pointless posts you've reached across this site, I'd say there still has to be at least, say... 500 posts left in me. ;)
lifethroughalens said on 26th November 2008
Wohoo, Glad i'm not involved in that one!
Just to say that, on the whole, I think that the team of TR reviewers are an honest bunch and I value their opinion...which is why I bother to chip in now and again. Ok, so occasionally their editorial slant on a product may rub people up the wrong way, but it's all just an (educated & informed) opinion and it's not written in blood.
The controversy really starts when a specific reporting media opinion becomes so coveted by the manufacturer that it directly effects their product line-up & even livelihood. I think TR's got a way to go yet!
At the end of the day we'll all vote with our wallets.
lifethroughalens said on 26th November 2008
@Darfuria "Honestly, how many paragraphs of drivel do you have to type before you accept a point without grabbing it by the hand and skipping through the park of delusion and misunderstanding?"
Nice line. Can I use that one?! :)
Darfuria said on 26th November 2008
@lifethroughalens - Only if you buy me lunch.
Keith said on 26th November 2008
@Rsaeire - If that is the case, then the comments section for this article shouldn’t exist because
Nothing wrong with comments Rsaeire, but you seem to be on a mission to make everyone agree with you. The people at TR have made a list of what they believe are the best in each category, TR are not forcing you to agree, so wouldn't it seem fair that you do the same.
Darfuria said on 26th November 2008
Awh, and here I was thinking that this had come to a swift end.
Ed said on 26th November 2008
Well even if it had come to an end, it certainly hadn't been swift. ;-)
Darfuria said on 26th November 2008
Well, swift when I joined in :P
Stelph said on 27th November 2008
Can we not push on to a 100 posts for the record?
:-)
I like these comparison articles where products are compared against each other and the winner is selected, sometimes it can be hard to decide which is the best when you are looking to buy something, and personally its a nice feeling when you see something that you have spent your hard earned cash on appear in the awards section! :-)
Sivart said on 1st December 2008
Just read the awards article & then looked forward to the comments.
Big disapointment to find it dominated by a fruitcake with a grudge and an old pals reunion discussing lunch dates.
Is there no moderator on this site. Lots of people would have opinions but, like me, not in this childish atmosphere.
As I said a big disapointment!
Sivart
Ardjuna said on 5th December 2008
@Sivart: yes, it would have been nice to see some more comments about the actual products, and about awards other than the arguably least important 'style' one. Still, it's not too late to turn things around (and breach that 100 comments mark Stelph ;).
AlexMck said on 11th December 2008
Great job Riyad. Have been following the site for a long time but only just decided to register.
Rsaeire and Singularity -- have ye any lives to lead? I should think that, for your own livelihood and happiness, you ought to follow the advice given in Shawshank Redemption: "Get busy living, or get busy dying." obviously, it would be better to do the former rather than the latter.
One small point though -- i wonder, what with Google Chrome, Firefox 3, Internet explorer 8 etc, whether this article could have done with a "best browser" section.
otherwise, great.
PaulW said on 11th January 2009
@Sivart .. I agree with you to a degree. I dont have the funds to be fortunate to be able to buy a B&W Zeppelin, and therefore look forward to reviews of such products here @ TR. No matter what Riyad (other TR staff say)says, there will also be some contention. I bought a Samsung G600 phone for Xmas .. mainly because of the brilliant review here. As it happens, i dont like it & have gone back to my Nokia 6300. I also have a Nokia E71 (which another user was raving about) & I aint too keen on that either.
So what am I trying to say? Well this .. I find the TR site just about the most "accurate" place to go to read products reviews, and generally I find the conclusions produced "weigh in" with my own needs. I bought a Canon Pixma MP610 on the strength of its review & its brilliant! I also bought a Fuji S9600 camera purely on the review here & what a blinder! Brilliant choice & a brilliant review - altho very controversial at the time! 10 / 10 for a camera that I bought for £199!!
The arguments put forward about B&W Zeppelin as an iPod docking station do produce a smile on my face. I can many years ago, someone in Hi-Fi News stating "the wider you open the windows, the more the muck flies in", and having an iPod myself, I cannot but agree with this statement .. as the audio quality of the Apple iPod is well documented to be "questionable". Poor audio in - poor audio out!
BUT .. at least TR do actually carry out reviews of products tested. Some years back (in an earlier life) I was involved heavily in the PC MIDI market & ran a well know UK PC MIDI company distributing such products as Music Quest MIDI cards, CardD DAW card & Cadenza sequencing software (Gordon .. are you reading this? You & I have had several chats in the past about some of these products.)
On one occasion I was approached by a well known MIDI Music mag (no names mentioned, but their offices were in Bath!) asking for a sample Music Quest card for "head to head" review. I had always had my suspicions about the "authenticity" of reviews carried out by this Mag, & so I sent off a card that I knew to be faulty! It simply didnt work!
We came 2nd in a head to head shoot out with other popular MIDI card! We werent asked to replace the faulty card, yet we came in 2nd place! Amazing eh?
Thanks goodness we have moved on & we have sites like TR.
Well done guys .. whilst I dont agree with all that you say, I am darned glad that you have presence on the web! Sorry for going off topic a tad!
Happy New Year!
Add Your Comment
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


yawwwwwzzaaa!!!
Nice-Em's!!
very detailed reviews
Best site in the planet!
Keep up that good work