Intel Slackens Netbook Definition
| Author | Hugo Jobling |
| Published | 13th Jul 2009 |
If we're going to conform to one, Intel's definition of a netbook is probably the closest to sensible going and if HKEPC is right it's been extended to make even more sense. Fear not folks, I won't be changing my Intel's definition of a netbook classification any time soon as a result.

Supposedly Intel is relaxing the limits on what screens can be uses in conjunction with Atom. The previously 10.xin or smaller size ceiling will remain but resolutions above 1,024 x 600 are now allowed. In other words: an N-series netbook-orientated Atom CPU can now be paired with a 1,366 x 768 pixel display.
Such claims seem backed up by the likes of the Sony W Series and HP Mini 110, which both offer the pairing of a 1,366 x 768 pixel screen with an Atom CPU. Given sales of netbooks seem to be slowing, it's hardly surprising that the remit of what can be classed as one is expanding - by differing degrees depending on which classification you prefer - to fit higher-specced systems. Whether that suggests netbook customers now are more discerning or just pickier is a matter of debate, however.
How long now until a 10.xin, 1,366 x 768 pixel screen, a dual-core Atom CPU and 20 hours of battery life become standard netbook specs? I might even be able to give up my not a netbook rant, soon!
HKEPC (Google translated).
Related Articles
Latest 2 of 2 Comments
Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.
Gavin Hamer said on 13th July 2009
Prem said on 27th July 2009
Why is Intel controlling the netbook specicification anyway?
Why can't manufacturers produce what they want to - and be creative!!!
See all 2 comments on this article.
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.


2 comments
Email
TrustedReviews Newsletters
Surely the classification should be defined by the actual physical size of the device. The other specifications are not relevant. If my fridge had an Atom CPU and a 10" scre... more