1 of 46 pictures
spelling mistake last paragraph second line "al" to "all"Great review :)
It is fortunate that these top-end phones are likely so expensive - you need to empty your pockets of cash in order to fit the damn things in!
what a shame only made out of plastic should be the aluminium with mao finish for real premium feel and the extra strength to protect the high investment we would be making tech specs are impressive so lets hope the service providers don't mess up with their overlays as usually happens
The review says the screen is "Stunning", however the Image Quality has been awarded 7/10... ?? I can't think of 3 greater adjectives above Stunning hehe...
Have the Design score and Image Quality score been confused?
Also, if you were to review the White version, is it likely this would have received a Trusted Award?? To wait for the S3 or not :s
Our Image Quality score refers to the camera, not the screen.
Possibly, though there are a number of other issues.
Dang! I got the grey verion on order :( I hope its not too much of disapointment your suggesting the finish is! Cheers for the review. Fingers crossed my hands wont find the new clown-phone format too large!
you wouldnt think having to press the top button to get out of stand by woud be much of a deal breaker but ive honestly nearly smashed my old htc phone about a 100 times because of it,weird.
also you said it has the best camera on ANY smartphone then gave it a 7
Do I? Where? I certainly didn't mean to. It's an okay camera.
you waxed lyrical about the camera in the video review,among the best has to be taken as it is said.
to clarify...among the best i would expect a 9,then add in the HOST of extra features translates as hard to find better.although not THE best certainly more than a 7.
then again maybe your paid to wax lyrical.
Ah yes, I see. In fairness, I say it's among the best out there, which it is. However, it's good because of its features, not image quality. I appreciate it's not entirely clear.
Maybe review samples get more abuse (?), but even so that sticky-out camera seems vulnerable. Picture #3 seems to show quite a few abrasions around the edge of the 'spout', which seems to be soft aluminium, and the marks carry on to the lens cover, which I guess isn't Gorilla Glass? Since those marks will scatter parasitic light into the lens it will be more than just a cosmetic issue, although I suspect that on a £450 phone the cosmetic damage will be the greater issue to most owners.
Looking forward to seeing how this squares up to the Samsung Galaxy S3.
Just received my htc one x. First impressions seem positive, the only software issue I've come across is that there seems to be some graphics banding on the left edge of the screen when scrolling to the right in google maps. It would be interesting to see if any other user or trusted reviews have this problem. I can't seem to recreate it anywhere else, though I haven't played any games on it as yet.
Today, all phones on the market are the garbage. Where is that future? Around the corner or what? Until when?We need flexi screens, lighter phones with long lasting batteries, more sofisticaded phones...The future is now! Not tomorrow, not for decade. NOW! To all manufacture companies: Go back to the drawing boards. Now.Simple question: What I get better from the ex-generation? Simply put, NOTHING.@TrustedReviews9/10, compare to what? Nokia 3210?Evaluate again your criteria, from scratch.
nokia lumia 800 is a "better looking phone"...WTH?lumia 710 looks far better than 800...800 looks like a rectangular box!man, u must be joking...and what do you mean by "A few silly ergonomics slip ups???"i read your reviews for one reason,to have a good laugh!you guys complain over every thing...remember,no phone is perfect!image quality 7/10? and just underneath it you have mentioned "Excellent 8MP camera" and "Stunning HD screen"...based on what criteria have you given the rating? think before publishing a review about a product...this is not the first time i have seem trusted reviews post such silly reviews
although,the biggest joke is £459 dosn't surprise anyone.
guess we will never learn when it comes to smartphones.
I had a play with this handset in the local O2 shop and came away underwhelmed. Poor build quality and an average screen. I'll keep my HTC Desire thanks until the Galaxy S3 comes out.
I happened across a thread saying that A2DP quality on the One X is pretty dire: http://forum.xda-developers.co...
This would matter quite a bit to me for music, and no doubt it would also matter to many people for hands-free calls in the car.
OK I have been using the One-x for a month now, and I can say on the whole its great. I will however say this, the screen coating scratches VERY easily, I now have many scratches on it with just normal in pocket use, no keys or other sharp objects. Very disapointed about this as the Desire it has replaced has lasted over 2 years with only a couple of very minor scratches. Not a fan of screen protectors as these things should be build to take this sort of thing! or whats the point in making it so thin to only bulk it back up with some naff looking protector.Any how rant over, the rest of it is great.
Got mine today and absolutely love it! Huge, huge upgrade over my 2,5 year old Nokia 5800.
Pros? Everything :) Screen is fantastic, sharp and more lifelike than AMOLED screens found in other top-end mobiles. Camera takes very good pictures. Android 4/Sense 4 combo much better than previous versions.
Cons? Speaker is not loud enough and it lacks oomph (compared to Nokia 5800's stereo speakers). Metal ring around camera lens sticks out and is prone to scratches. And I'll miss couple of games that are availible for Nokia at Ovi Store but are unavailible at Google Play (Bejeweled Twist, Gears).
"only made out of plastic"?
Your perceptions of "quality" of metal over plastic are of course subjective (and shared by many). However, when you look at fitness for purpose, polycarbonate has many advantages over metal:
1) polycarbonate will absorb impacts without damage where metal metal will absorb the impact by denting2) polycarbonate is thru-coloured so scratches are not so visible, metal usually has a surface finish which scratces through to reveal shiny metal underneath.3) polycarbonate allows RF signals to pass, metal does not4) polycarbonate is lighter than metal
Overall, polycarbonate would be my choice of material for a premium phone. Metal might have the shop-window benefit of 'perceived' quality, especially on day one when it is all shiny new, but polycarbonate is the better performer and will hold its looks better over time. I think the whole 'metal = quality' (and "heavy = quality") thing is a hangover from the days of literally 'cheap' poor quality plastic devices, but as high-end engineering polycarbonates start making their presence felt in premium products those associations hopefully will change.
If you want a dramatic example of polycarbonate's superior toughness and strength compared to metal, just go to the local vehicle scrapyard and see some crash damaged cars - the front end metal work will be all bent and twisted, but chances are the (polycarbonate) headlamps are still intact, even if they are hanging out by their wires.
Mobile Phone round-ups
The best large-screen smartphones out there
Should you buy now or wait?
Mobile Phone Buying Guide: The best now and the phones coming up this year
More Mobile Phone Round-ups
Sign up for the
TrustedReviews email newsletter
Get TrustedReviews' award-winning reviews, opinions and advice delivered to your inbox for free!
Plus get great deals and exclusive offers from Time Inc. (UK) Ltd and its partners.
Trusted Reviews is part of the Time Inc. (UK) Ltd Technology Network